Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiniMax M3

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads MiniMax M3 on coding, 70.3 to 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 2.0x less per output token ($0.60 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 34 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
33
MiniMax M3MiniMax
Coding
39.2
Overall
51.7
Output $/M
$1.20
1
vs boards won of 34 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or MiniMax M3: which to pick

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.2 for MiniMax M3, though on 4 benchmarks against 6.

Pick MiniMax M3 for work measured by Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.

Shared results
34
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
5
MiniMax M3 only
83
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, MiniMax M3 39.2 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 28.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LiveBench browser: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 76.0% against MiniMax M3 8.0%, 68.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against MiniMax M3 $1.20 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsMiniMax M3Ties
Coding90
Intelligence10
Agentic work80
Reasoning50
Math10
Web design80
General11
All shared boards331
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index90
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017MiniMax M3Leader
LiveBench coding96.0%70.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev16641482DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
AA Coding IndexNot measured58.6Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured75.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%1.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%47.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%19.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured53.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured33.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured9.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured51.5%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SciCode55.9%47.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured42.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured14.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
ALE-Bench1622.0640.0DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1470Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1466Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16671478DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: HTML16871455DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1470Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017MiniMax M3Leader
AA Intelligence Index39.529.2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.9Only MiniMax M3 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017MiniMax M3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured29.5Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1200Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1197Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1169Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1158Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1159Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1120Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1178Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets12591042DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench research79.5%68.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench browser76.0%8.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench long agentic50.9%12.4%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%48.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%20.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%29.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%47.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured88.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured37.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured4.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$2,158Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017MiniMax M3Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured92.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench reasoning89.1%74.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured81.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured92.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%39.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%90.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
SimpleBenchNot measured45.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%13.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Mystery game puzzles49.0%8.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1447Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1461Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1455Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1266Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1268Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017MiniMax M3Leader
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%71.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
ProofBenchNot measured18.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1429Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1448Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017MiniMax M3Leader
MMLU ProNot measured84.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured68.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured72.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured46.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SimpleQA Verified42.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1452Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1441Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1437Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1434Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017MiniMax M3Leader
Design Arena: websites13101257DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: UI components13061243DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: game dev13521210DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: data viz13061236DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: 3D13631208DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: all code categories13301246DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1160Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art12331161DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench design83.4%66.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017MiniMax M3Leader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%76.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured50.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured87.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured60.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
IFBenchNot measured82.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%83.0%MiniMax M3
DTBenchNot measured78.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMCANot measured33.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured55.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1433Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1433Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1404Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1251Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1443Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1420Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1466Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1428Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1380Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1373Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1444Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1433Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1426Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1423Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1443Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1446Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1419Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1403Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1263Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1311Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1259Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1235Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1197Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1234Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1435Only MiniMax M3 measured
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1150Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017MiniMax M3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.0009Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.019Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.072Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and MiniMax M3
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017MiniMax M3
MakerDeepSeekMiniMax
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026May 31, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.60$1.20
Coding index70.339.2
Independent measurements behind it46
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.56
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than MiniMax M3 for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.2 for MiniMax M3, though on 4 benchmarks against 6. Pick MiniMax M3 for work measured by Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or MiniMax M3?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or MiniMax M3?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiniMax M3 comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M3's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-minimax-minimax-m3" title="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiniMax M3, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-minimax-minimax-m3">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiniMax M3</a></p>