Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiniMax M3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads MiniMax M3 on coding, 39.5 to 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiniMax M3 costs 12.5x less per output token ($1.20 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 69 benchmarks have a result for both.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiniMax M3: which to pick
Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiniMax M3 are level for coding, 39.5 against 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide.
Pick MiniMax M3 for output tokens 12.5x cheaper ($1.20 vs $15.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.56 against $1.16). Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 69
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
- 26
- MiniMax M3 only
- 47
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Level: 39.5 against 39.2, inside 2 points.
3 and 6 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 leads, 29.2 against 20.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 leads, 29.5 against 15.8.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 leads, 92.7% against 81.6%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a AIME result, 88.2%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads, 87.4% against 84.2%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 leads, 1257 against 1189.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 takes 1.05M tokens against 1M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiniMax M3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 $0.011, MiniMax M3 $0.0009 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
MiniMax M3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 $1.16, MiniMax M3 $0.56.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 39.5 from 3 benchmarks, MiniMax M3 39.2 from 6 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 12.8 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Claude Sonnet 4.5 22.6% against MiniMax M3 47.6%, 24.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 $15.00 against MiniMax M3 $1.20 per million output tokens, 12.5x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 takes 1M tokens, MiniMax M3 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Bars | MiniMax M3 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 7 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 4 | ||
| Reasoning | 5 | 4 | ||
| Math | 4 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 5 | 5 | ||
| Web design | 1 | 7 | ||
| General | 17 | 5 | ||
| All shared boards | 35 | 34 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index27
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 74.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 67.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 70.9% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1394 | 1482 | MiniMax M3 |
| AA Coding Index | 52.1 | 58.6 | MiniMax M3 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 73.0% | 82.2% | MiniMax M3 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 70.0% | 75.0% | MiniMax M3 |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 1.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 22.6% | 47.6% | MiniMax M3 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 19.9% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 53.6% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 33.3% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 9.2% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.5% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 65.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 47.1% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 42.4% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | 46.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 14.7% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| GSO-Bench | 14.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| WeirdML | 47.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Cybench | 60.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 640.0 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1488 | 1470 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1473 | 1466 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1386 | 1478 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1399 | 1455 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1470 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 20.7 | 29.2 | MiniMax M3 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.7 | 146.9 | MiniMax M3 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 15.8 | 29.5 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1060 | 1200 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1050 | 1197 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1137 | 1169 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1159 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1158 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1130 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1181 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | Not measured | 1028 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 68.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 8.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 12.4% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 48.3% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 20.6% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 29.8% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.8% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 88.9% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 37.7% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| METR time horizons | 67.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Remote Labor Index | 2.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| GDPval | 42.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Not measured | 4.6% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | 52.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| OSWorld | 62.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $3,839 | $2,158 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 73.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index54
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 81.6% | 92.7% | MiniMax M3 |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 74.5% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 79.3% | 81.2% | MiniMax M3 |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 92.9% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 39.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 82.3% | 90.9% | MiniMax M3 |
| ARC-AGI | 63.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 13.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| SimpleBench | 54.3% | 45.8% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Chess puzzles | 10.0% | 13.0% | MiniMax M3 |
| Mystery game puzzles | 17.0% | 8.0% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| EBR-bench | 2.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| VPCT | 39.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1462 | 1447 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1483 | 1461 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1471 | 1455 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1266 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1268 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 88.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 94.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 77.8% | 71.1% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 23.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 2.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| ProofBench | 19.0% | 18.0% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| MATH level 5 | 97.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1449 | 1429 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1462 | 1448 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index55
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.4% | 84.2% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 84.1% | 85.4% | MiniMax M3 |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 62.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 62.0% | 68.1% | MiniMax M3 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 73.3% | 72.7% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 64.0% | 68.4% | MiniMax M3 |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 94.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 44.1% | 46.3% | MiniMax M3 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 30.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1448 | 1452 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1444 | 1441 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1451 | 1437 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1440 | 1434 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 40.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1189 | 1257 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1170 | 1242 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1166 | 1210 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1167 | 1236 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1157 | 1208 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1182 | 1247 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1115 | 1161 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1205 | 1161 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 66.2% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index175
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 76.2% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 64.1% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 36.1% | 50.6% | MiniMax M3 |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 84.5% | 87.3% | MiniMax M3 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 60.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 82.9% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 83.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| DTBench | 83.2% | 78.9% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMCA | 38.8% | 33.7% | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 55.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1438 | 1433 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1459 | 1433 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1442 | 1404 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1251 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1450 | 1443 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1425 | 1420 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1460 | 1466 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1427 | 1428 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1390 | 1380 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1402 | 1373 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1459 | 1444 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1458 | 1433 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1437 | 1426 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1423 | 1423 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1465 | 1443 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1475 | 1446 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1442 | 1419 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1428 | 1403 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1263 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1311 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1259 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1235 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1197 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1234 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Document | 1450 | 1435 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiniMax M3 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiniMax M3 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiniMax M3 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5 | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | MiniMax |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | September 29, 2025 | May 31, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $3.00 | $0.30 |
| Output $/Mtok | $15.00 | $1.20 |
| Coding index | 39.5 | 39.2 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 6 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.16 | $0.56 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than MiniMax M3 for coding?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiniMax M3 are level for coding, 39.5 against 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide. Pick MiniMax M3 for output tokens 12.5x cheaper ($1.20 vs $15.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.56 against $1.16). Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiniMax M3?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $1.16 and MiniMax M3 $0.56.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiniMax M3?
MiniMax M3, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiniMax M3 comparison based on?
69 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M3's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.