Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Spark 1.1

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.1 tie on coding at 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 7.1x less per output token ($0.60 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 22 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
17
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.0
Output $/M
$4.25
5
vs boards won of 22 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Muse Spark 1.1: which to pick

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.1 are level for coding, 70.3 against 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide.

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for work measured by SciCode or Finance Agent (Vals AI), where it leads. Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for output tokens 7.1x cheaper ($0.60 vs $4.25 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
22
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
17
Muse Spark 1.1 only
74
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 70.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Knowledge, 15.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: spreadsheets: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 1245 against Muse Spark 1.1 1042, 25.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 7.1x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsMuse Spark 1.1Ties
Coding51
Intelligence10
Agentic work31
Reasoning11
Knowledge01
Web design61
General10
All shared boards175
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index51
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.1Leader
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev16641542DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.3Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%72.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%31.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SciCode55.9%58.8%Muse Spark 1.1
ALE-Bench1622.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1498Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1498Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16671532DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: HTML16871540DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index39.533.7DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured154.1Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured25.8Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1207Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1199Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1175Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1178Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1103Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1183Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1195Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1155Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets12451042DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench research79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench browser76.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%57.2%Muse Spark 1.1
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%38.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%56.4%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured31.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,520Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.1Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured91.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveBench reasoning89.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%46.2%Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%34.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Mystery game puzzles49.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1485Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1478Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1480Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1305Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1287Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.1Leader
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
ProofBenchNot measured39.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1482Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1487Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured71.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured79.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SimpleQA Verified42.5%57.8%Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1479Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1481Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1470Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index61
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.1Leader
Design Arena: websites13111270DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: UI components13031289DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: game dev13571269DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: data viz13301268DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: 3D13581260DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: all code categories13321276DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1235Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art12421271Muse Spark 1.1
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.1Leader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured66.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%77.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DTBenchNot measured94.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMCANot measured49.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured52.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1478Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1457Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1435Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1478Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1471Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1515Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1469Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1450Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1459Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1492Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1464Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1482Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1499Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1462Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1448Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1438Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1292Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1348Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1288Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1253Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.1
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Meta Muse Spark 1.1
MakerDeepSeekMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026July 16, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.60$4.25
Coding index70.370.3
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.1 are level for coding, 70.3 against 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide. Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for work measured by SciCode or Finance Agent (Vals AI), where it leads. Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for output tokens 7.1x cheaper ($0.60 vs $4.25 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Muse Spark 1.1?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Muse Spark 1.1?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?

22 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.1's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-1" title="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Spark 1.1, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-1">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Spark 1.1</a></p>