Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Spark 1.2

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads Muse Spark 1.2 on coding, 70.3 to 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 7.1x less per output token ($0.60 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 30 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
21
Muse Spark 1.2Meta
Coding
55.7
Overall
60.4
Output $/M
$4.25
9
vs boards won of 30 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Muse Spark 1.2: which to pick

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 55.7 for Muse Spark 1.2, though on 4 benchmarks against 5.

Pick Muse Spark 1.2 for work measured by SciCode or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
30
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
9
Muse Spark 1.2 only
67
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.2 55.7 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Knowledge, 17.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LiveBench browser: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 76.0% against Muse Spark 1.2 36.0%, 40.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 per million output tokens, 7.1x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsMuse Spark 1.2Ties
Coding71
Intelligence01
Agentic work61
Reasoning12
Knowledge01
Web design53
General20
All shared boards219
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index71
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench coding96.0%78.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev16641534DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
AA Coding IndexNot measured72.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%6.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%79.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%29.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured21.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured53.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SciCode55.9%57.4%Muse Spark 1.2
FrontierSWENot measured12.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
WeirdMLNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ALE-Bench1622.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1505Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1505Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16671526DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: HTML16871543DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Intelligence Index39.539.6Muse Spark 1.2
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured155.1Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index61
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured43.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1221Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1210Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1181Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1222Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1179Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1085Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1172Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1245Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%67.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench browser76.0%36.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench long agentic50.9%21.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%60.6%Muse Spark 1.2
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%32.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%43.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%57.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured45.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench reasoning89.1%90.0%Muse Spark 1.2
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%45.5%Muse Spark 1.2
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured74.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%27.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Mystery game puzzles49.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1489Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1475Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1487Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1317Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.2Leader
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
ProofBenchNot measured43.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1480Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.2Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured70.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured49.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SimpleQA Verified42.5%60.3%Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1500Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1496Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1517Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index53
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.2Leader
Design Arena: websites13111312Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: UI components13031298DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: game dev13571301DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: data viz13301334Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: 3D13581301DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: all code categories13321312DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1284Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art12421284Muse Spark 1.2
LiveBench design83.4%67.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.2Leader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%76.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured90.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured69.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%79.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DTBenchNot measured94.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMCANot measured48.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1482Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1462Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1436Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1304Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1483Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1476Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1509Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1462Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1495Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1483Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1502Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1473Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1453Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1443Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1291Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1313Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Muse Spark 1.2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.0034Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.075Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.292Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Muse Spark 1.2
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Meta Muse Spark 1.2
MakerDeepSeekMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026August 5, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.60$4.25
Coding index70.355.7
Independent measurements behind it45
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 55.7 for Muse Spark 1.2, though on 4 benchmarks against 5. Pick Muse Spark 1.2 for work measured by SciCode or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Muse Spark 1.2?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Muse Spark 1.2?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Spark 1.2 comparison based on?

30 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.2's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-2" title="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Spark 1.2, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-2">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Spark 1.2</a></p>