Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Grok 4.6

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads Grok 4.6 on coding, 70.3 to 65.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 10.0x less per output token ($0.60 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
25
Grok 4.6xAI
Coding
65.7
Overall
67.4
Output $/M
$6.00
11
vs boards won of 36 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Grok 4.6: which to pick

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 65.7 for Grok 4.6, though on 4 benchmarks against 6.

Pick Grok 4.6 for work measured by Code migration (Vals AI) or SciCode, where it leads.

Shared results
36
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
3
Grok 4.6 only
87
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, Grok 4.6 65.7 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Knowledge, 6.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 31.8% against Grok 4.6 17.2%, 19.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against Grok 4.6 $6.00 per million output tokens, 10.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens, Grok 4.6 500K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsGrok 4.6Ties
Coding72
Intelligence01
Agentic work43
Reasoning23
Math30
Knowledge01
Web design71
General20
All shared boards2511
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index72
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.6Leader
LiveBench coding96.0%89.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev16641617DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
AA Coding IndexNot measured76.8Only Grok 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured88.2%Only Grok 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured95.6%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%17.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%76.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%44.6%Grok 4.6
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured1.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured78.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured14.8%Only Grok 4.6 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured55.8%Only Grok 4.6 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.7%Only Grok 4.6 measured
SciCode55.9%56.5%Grok 4.6
FrontierCodeNot measured48.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierSWENot measured25.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
WeirdMLNot measured67.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
ALE-Bench1622.01508.1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1466Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1457Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16671631DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: HTML16871597DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1603Only Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.6Leader
AA Intelligence Index39.544.3Grok 4.6
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured156.6Only Grok 4.6 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index43
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.6Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured53.0Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1248Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1264Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1234Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1291Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1276Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1210Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1200Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1216Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1260Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%84.5%Grok 4.6
LiveBench browser76.0%64.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench long agentic50.9%40.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%53.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%33.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%48.1%Grok 4.6
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%62.7%Grok 4.6
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured11.4%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured38.1%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured5.8%Only Grok 4.6 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured65.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$9,047Only Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.6Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured94.7%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench reasoning89.1%91.2%Grok 4.6
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured30.6%Only Grok 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured94.9%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%44.1%Grok 4.6
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%94.0%Grok 4.6
ARC-AGINot measured87.5%Only Grok 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured67.1%Only Grok 4.6 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured75.9%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%33.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Mystery game puzzles49.0%34.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
EBR-benchNot measured30.5%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1448Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1469Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1445Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1285Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1283Only Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.6Leader
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%99.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%66.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%31.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProofBenchNot measured51.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1417Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1464Only Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.6Leader
MMLU ProNot measured89.4%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured66.2%Only Grok 4.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.1%Only Grok 4.6 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.2%Only Grok 4.6 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured44.7%Only Grok 4.6 measured
SimpleQA Verified42.5%49.3%Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1437Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1420Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1429Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1416Only Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index71
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.6Leader
Design Arena: websites13111289DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: UI components13061293DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: game dev13531295DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: data viz13121282DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: 3D13581275DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: all code categories13311292DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1238Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art12351279Grok 4.6
LiveBench design83.4%79.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.6Leader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%75.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured66.8%Only Grok 4.6 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured28.9%Only Grok 4.6 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured86.5%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%81.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DTBenchNot measured97.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMCANot measured48.5%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured40.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1429Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1431Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1426Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1263Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1433Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1420Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1476Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1426Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1378Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1391Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1455Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1414Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1421Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1430Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1425Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1456Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1429Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1421Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1270Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1289Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1272Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1270Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1262Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1452Only Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.6Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
Grok 4.6$0.0050Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
Grok 4.6$0.118Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
Grok 4.6$0.460Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Grok 4.6
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017SpaceXAI Grok 4.6
MakerDeepSeekxAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026August 12, 2026
Context window1.05M500K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.60$6.00
Coding index70.365.7
Independent measurements behind it46
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.82
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Grok 4.6 for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 65.7 for Grok 4.6, though on 4 benchmarks against 6. Pick Grok 4.6 for work measured by Code migration (Vals AI) or SciCode, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Grok 4.6?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Grok 4.6?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Grok 4.6 comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.6's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-grok-4-6" title="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Grok 4.6, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-grok-4-6">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Grok 4.6</a></p>