Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-5 Mini

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads GPT-5 Mini on coding, 70.3 to 34.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 3.3x less per output token ($0.60 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 19 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
19
GPT-5 MiniOpenAI
Coding
34.2
Overall
43.7
Output $/M
$2.00
0
vs boards won of 19 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GPT-5 Mini: which to pick

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 34.2 for GPT-5 Mini.

GPT-5 Mini is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
19
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
20
GPT-5 Mini only
82
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, GPT-5 Mini 34.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 45.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 87.7% against GPT-5 Mini 14.2%, 73.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against GPT-5 Mini $2.00 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-5 Mini 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsGPT-5 MiniTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning40
Math30
Knowledge10
Web design70
General10
All shared boards190
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5 MiniLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured59.8%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
SWE-bench MultilingualNot measured39.7%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev1664Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured60.8%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%14.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.8%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
SciCode55.9%39.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.3%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured34.8%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
WeirdMLNot measured52.7%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
ALE-Bench1622.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1406Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1394Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena WebDev: React1667Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1687Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5 MiniLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.520.6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured145.3Only GPT-5 Mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5 MiniLeader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1230Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench browser76.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured71.1%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured-$31Only GPT-5 Mini measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured55.5%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5 MiniLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured80.3%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LiveBench reasoning89.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured78.9%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.8%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%21.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%75.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ARC-AGINot measured54.3%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured4.4%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
Chess puzzles46.0%24.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Mystery game puzzles49.0%10.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
VPCTNot measured40.2%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1380Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1379Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1383Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1202Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1210Only GPT-5 Mini measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured70.3%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5 MiniLeader
AIMENot measured91.5%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured94.8%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured92.6%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
AA Math IndexNot measured90.7Only GPT-5 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.7%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%86.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%46.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%12.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProofBenchNot measured9.0%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
MATH level 5Not measured97.8%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1378Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1380Only GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5 MiniLeader
MMLU ProNot measured82.2%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured81.8%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured60.2%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.2%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.9%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured96.1%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured43.0%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.7%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified42.5%21.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1371Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1380Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1375Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1358Only GPT-5 Mini measured
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured38.6%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5 MiniLeader
Design Arena: websites13121125DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: UI components13001106DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: game dev13621130DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: data viz13351130DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: 3D13721037DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: all code categories13341115DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1091Only GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: ASCII art12431125DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5 MiniLeader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured43.0%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured80.6%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
IFBenchNot measured75.4%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%72.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DTBenchNot measured80.5%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMCANot measured34.2%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured69.4%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured83.1%Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena TextNot measured1373Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1357Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1325Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1202Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1379Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1363Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1386Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1366Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1341Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1308Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1386Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1354Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1362Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1378Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1363Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1355Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1344Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1340Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1216Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1214Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1199Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1205Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1217Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1226Only GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1181Only GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5 Mini
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5 MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
GPT-5 Mini$0.0013Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
GPT-5 Mini$0.018Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
GPT-5 Mini$0.070Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5 Mini
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017OpenAI GPT-5 Mini
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026August 7, 2025
Context window1.05M400K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.25
Output $/Mtok$0.60$2.00
Coding index70.334.2
Independent measurements behind it42
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.08
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than GPT-5 Mini for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 34.2 for GPT-5 Mini. GPT-5 Mini is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GPT-5 Mini?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Mini costs $0.25 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5 Mini only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GPT-5 Mini?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-5 Mini comparison based on?

19 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and GPT-5 Mini's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-gpt-5-mini" title="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-5 Mini, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-gpt-5-mini">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-5 Mini</a></p>