Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-5.4

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads GPT-5.4 on coding, 70.3 to 64.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 25.0x less per output token ($0.60 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 23 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
17
GPT-5.4OpenAI
Coding
64.4
Overall
69.6
Output $/M
$15.00
6
vs boards won of 23 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GPT-5.4: which to pick

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 64.4 for GPT-5.4.

Pick GPT-5.4 for a larger context window (1.05M against 1.05M tokens) and work measured by Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run), where it leads.

Shared results
23
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
16
GPT-5.4 only
87
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, GPT-5.4 64.4 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 17.9 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: 3D: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 1358 against GPT-5.4 1065, 36.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against GPT-5.4 $15.00 per million output tokens, 25.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-5.4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsGPT-5.4Ties
Coding60
Intelligence10
Reasoning13
Math12
Knowledge01
Web design70
General10
All shared boards176
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index60
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5.4Leader
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev16641464DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.1Only GPT-5.4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.1%Only GPT-5.4 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured78.2%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%67.4%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%35.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only GPT-5.4 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured51.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
SciCode55.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured57.6%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured81.8%Only GPT-5.4 measured
GSO-BenchNot measured31.4%Only GPT-5.4 measured
WeirdMLNot measured77.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MirrorCodeNot measured15.6%Only GPT-5.4 measured
ALE-Bench1622.01607.0DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1496Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1491Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16671454DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: HTML16871478DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1436Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5.4Leader
AA Intelligence Index39.539.0DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.3Only GPT-5.4 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5.4Leader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1059Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1017Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1087Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1031Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1135Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1245Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench browser76.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured87.1%Only GPT-5.4 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured52.4%Only GPT-5.4 measured
METR time horizonsNot measured74.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
DeepResearch BenchNot measured35.1%Only GPT-5.4 measured
PostTrainBenchNot measured19.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,144Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5.4Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured91.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LiveBench reasoning89.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured87.5%Only GPT-5.4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured92.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%43.7%GPT-5.4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%93.3%GPT-5.4
ARC-AGINot measured93.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured74.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%48.0%GPT-5.4
Mystery game puzzles49.0%37.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
EBR-benchNot measured25.4%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1485Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1507Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1479Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1327Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1336Only GPT-5.4 measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured63.8%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5.4Leader
AIMENot measured96.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%97.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%78.6%GPT-5.4
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%49.0%GPT-5.4
ProofBenchNot measured56.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1488Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1497Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5.4Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.5%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured63.8%Only GPT-5.4 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured96.1%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
SimpleQA Verified42.5%45.1%GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1479Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1458Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1486Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1474Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5.4Leader
Design Arena: websites13111198DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: UI components13031212DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: game dev13571194DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: data viz13301196DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: 3D13581065DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: all code categories13321179DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1141Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art12421188DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5.4Leader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured77.5%Only GPT-5.4 measured
IFBenchNot measured73.9%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%82.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DTBenchNot measured94.4%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMCANot measured52.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
CL-benchNot measured27.9%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured37.5%Only GPT-5.4 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured21.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1469Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1469Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1439Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1303Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1467Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1465Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1520Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1472Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1485Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1449Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1493Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1452Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1480Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1472Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1482Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1473Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1458Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1438Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1301Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1354Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1312Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1284Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1251Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1283Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1471Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5.4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
GPT-5.4$0.010Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
GPT-5.4$0.170Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
GPT-5.4$0.650Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-5.4
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017OpenAI GPT-5.4
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026March 5, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$2.50
Output $/Mtok$0.60$15.00
Coding index70.364.4
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.02
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than GPT-5.4 for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 64.4 for GPT-5.4. Pick GPT-5.4 for a larger context window (1.05M against 1.05M tokens) and work measured by Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GPT-5.4?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 costs $2.50 and $15.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GPT-5.4?

GPT-5.4, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-5.4 comparison based on?

23 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.4's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-gpt-5-4" title="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-5.4, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-gpt-5-4">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-5.4</a></p>