Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads Gemini 3.7 Flash on coding, 70.3 to 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 6.3x less per output token ($0.60 vs $3.75 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 37 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
26
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle
Coding
58.0
Overall
65.7
Output $/M
$3.75
11
vs boards won of 37 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Gemini 3.7 Flash: which to pick

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 58.0 for Gemini 3.7 Flash, though on 4 benchmarks against 6.

Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash for work measured by SciCode or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
37
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
2
Gemini 3.7 Flash only
77
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, Gemini 3.7 Flash 58.0 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Knowledge, 26.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
SimpleQA Verified: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 42.5% against Gemini 3.7 Flash 69.2%, 26.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against Gemini 3.7 Flash $3.75 per million output tokens, 6.3x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsGemini 3.7 FlashTies
Coding81
Intelligence01
Agentic work62
Reasoning23
Math21
Knowledge01
Web design71
General11
All shared boards2611
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index81
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
LiveBench coding96.0%80.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev16641591DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.5Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured88.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured80.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%12.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%70.4%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%34.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured67.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured77.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.9%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SciCode55.9%59.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash
FrontierCodeNot measured43.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierSWENot measured20.3%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ALE-Bench1622.0904.3DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1499Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1498Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: React16671587DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: HTML16871593DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1599Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SciCodeNot measured13.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.539.6Gemini 3.7 Flash
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured158.0Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index62
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1223Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1208Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1229Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1243Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1264Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1235Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets12451058DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench research79.5%76.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench browser76.0%56.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench long agentic50.9%28.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured4.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%59.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%22.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%34.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%71.3%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured7.1%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured67.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Remote Labor IndexNot measured5.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured93.9%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench reasoning89.1%87.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured89.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured94.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%47.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%94.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash
ARC-AGINot measured95.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured84.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Chess puzzles46.0%66.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Mystery game puzzles49.0%37.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1495Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1512Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1487Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1329Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1320Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%97.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%71.6%Gemini 3.7 Flash
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%36.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1511Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1502Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
MMLU ProNot measured90.1%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.3%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured53.4%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SimpleQA Verified42.5%69.2%Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1511Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1494Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1496Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1479Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured71.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index71
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites13111303DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: UI components13031296DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: game dev13571317DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: data viz13301315DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: 3D13581307DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: all code categories13321308DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1283Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art12421276Gemini 3.7 Flash
LiveBench design83.4%73.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%68.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured49.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.9%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%83.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash
DTBenchNot measured96.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMCANot measured50.4%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured26.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena TextNot measured1489Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1484Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1488Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1314Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1483Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1487Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1552Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1506Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1511Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1481Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1500Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1495Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1515Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1503Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1485Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1492Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1491Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1477Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1309Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1394Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1299Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.0026Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.049Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.188Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Google Gemini 3.7 Flash
MakerDeepSeekGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026August 13, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.75
Output $/Mtok$0.60$3.75
Coding index70.358.0
Independent measurements behind it46
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.78
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Gemini 3.7 Flash for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 58.0 for Gemini 3.7 Flash, though on 4 benchmarks against 6. Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash for work measured by SciCode or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75 and $3.75. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.7 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash comparison based on?

37 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Gemini 3.7 Flash's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-gemini-3-7-flash" title="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-gemini-3-7-flash">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash</a></p>