LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

R1 0528 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Updated October 21, 2026. 40 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

R1 0528DeepSeek
Coding
71.4
Overall
13.1
Output $/M
$2.15
0
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
63.5
Overall
45.4
Output $/M
$6.00
40
vs boards won of 40 shared

Decision reading

Pick R1 0528 for coding: it scores 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 63.5 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902), though on 1 benchmark against 2.

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) when the context window is larger, 1M against 164K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
40
R1 0528 only
19
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
73
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
R1 0528 71.4 from 1 benchmark, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 63.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 32.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: R1 0528 66.4% against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 100.0%, 33.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
R1 0528 $2.15 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 2.8x apart.
Context window
R1 0528 takes 164K tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryR1 0528BarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning06
Math03
Knowledge04
Web design06
General018
All shared boards040
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Aider polyglot71.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1674Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured76.2Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured85.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured34.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured24.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured12.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)77.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SciCodeNot measured53.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
WeirdML41.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ALE-Bench804.1Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: coding14271502Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: software and IT14351498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1692Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1649Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence Index13.145.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.4Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured56.0Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1301Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1305Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1223Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1207Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1257Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured868Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench researchNot measured69.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured42.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured60.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
τ²-Bench Telecom36.5%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured63.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
METR time horizons53.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured93.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.3%92.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%43.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)76.3%92.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
ARC-AGI21.2%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ARC-AGI-21.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SimpleBench40.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured46.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured38.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14151496Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: expert13941507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14221503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Math Index76.0Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)76.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.4%100.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MATH level 596.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: math14001501Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: mathematical work14151491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured47.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: science14301512Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14451503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: legal and government14191492Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: business and finance14021480Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websites11491275Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: UI components11021340Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: game dev10981313Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: data viz11821281Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: 3D11111337Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: all code categories11391293Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: SVG1038Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1201Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured51.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IFBench39.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%80.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
DTBenchNot measured92.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMCANot measured46.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Fiction.LiveBench75.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text14281483Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: instruction following13821481Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: creative writing14051477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena VisionNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: English14371491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: non-English14121473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Chinese14421539Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: German14041478Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Japanese13911473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Korean13601460Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: French14171498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Spanish14111489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Russian14231482Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Polish14281471Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: multi-turn14051489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: longer queries13911488Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: writing and language14021477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14001464Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1311Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1358Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1304Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for R1 0528 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkR1 0528Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

R1 0528$0.0016Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

R1 0528 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

R1 0528$0.031Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

R1 0528 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

R1 0528$0.121Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

R1 0528 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of R1 0528 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationDeepSeek R1 0528Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 28, 2025September 3, 2026
Context window164K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.50$2.00
Output $/Mtok$2.15$6.00
Coding index71.463.5
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is R1 0528 better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Pick R1 0528 for coding: it scores 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 63.5 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902), though on 1 benchmark against 2. Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) when the context window is larger, 1M against 164K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

R1 0528 costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.15 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only.

Which has the bigger context window, R1 0528 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902), with 1M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the R1 0528 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

40 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. R1 0528's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next