LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

R1 0528 vs Step 5 Preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 28 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

R1 0528DeepSeek
Coding
71.4
Overall
13.1
Output $/M
$2.15
2
Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
71.4
Overall
43.7
Output $/M
$2.70
26
vs boards won of 28 shared

Decision reading

R1 0528 and Step 5 Preview are level for coding, 71.4 against 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide.

Pick Step 5 Preview when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 164K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads. Pick R1 0528 when output tokens cost 1.3x less, or when what matters is LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare or LMArena Text: Japanese, where it leads.

Shared results
28
R1 0528 only
31
Step 5 Preview only
33
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
R1 0528 71.4 from 1 benchmark, Step 5 Preview 71.4 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 30.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): R1 0528 55.7% against Step 5 Preview 88.3%, 32.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
R1 0528 $2.15 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
R1 0528 takes 164K tokens, Step 5 Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryR1 0528BarsStep 5 PreviewTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning04
Math02
Knowledge13
General114
All shared boards226
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for R1 0528 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Step 5 PreviewLeader
Aider polyglot71.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured85.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1567Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured70.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)77.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SciCodeNot measured58.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
WeirdML41.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ALE-Bench804.1Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: coding14271485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT14351473Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1583Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1556Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1550Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for R1 0528 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Step 5 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.143.7Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for R1 0528 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured72.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browserNot measured24.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured27.3%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom36.5%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
METR time horizons53.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for R1 0528 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.3%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%46.5%Step 5 Preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)76.3%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ARC-AGI21.2%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ARC-AGI-21.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SimpleBench40.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14151461Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: expert13941485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14221454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1308Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1265Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for R1 0528 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Step 5 PreviewLeader
AA Math Index76.0Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)76.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ProofBenchNot measured42.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MATH level 596.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: math14001458Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work14151460Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Knowledge benchmarks for R1 0528 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Step 5 PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: science14301454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14451439R1 0528
LMArena Text: legal and government14191437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: business and finance14021435Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for R1 0528 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Step 5 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites1149Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: UI components1102Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: game dev1098Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: data viz1182Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: 3D1111Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1139Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: SVG1038Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LiveBench designNot measured76.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index114
General benchmarks for R1 0528 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured63.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IFBench39.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%88.3%Step 5 Preview
Fiction.LiveBench75.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text14281440Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following13821438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing14051409Step 5 Preview
LMArena VisionNot measured1265Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: English14371447Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: non-English14121428Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese14421500Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: German1404Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese13911383R1 0528
LMArena Text: Korean1360Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: French14171438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Spanish14111441Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Russian14231433Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Polish1428Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14051437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries13911449Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: writing and language14021425Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14001412Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1290Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1282Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for R1 0528 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkR1 0528Step 5 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

R1 0528$0.0016Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

R1 0528 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

R1 0528$0.031Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request

R1 0528 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

R1 0528$0.121Exceeds the context window
Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request

R1 0528 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of R1 0528 and Step 5 Preview
SpecificationDeepSeek R1 0528StepFun Step 5 Preview
MakerDeepSeekStepFun
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMay 28, 2025October 8, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.50$1.00
Output $/Mtok$2.15$2.70
Coding index71.471.4
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is R1 0528 better than Step 5 Preview for coding?

R1 0528 and Step 5 Preview are level for coding, 71.4 against 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide. Pick Step 5 Preview when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 164K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads. Pick R1 0528 when output tokens cost 1.3x less, or when what matters is LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare or LMArena Text: Japanese, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or Step 5 Preview?

R1 0528 costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.15 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, R1 0528 or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the R1 0528 vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?

28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. R1 0528's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Step 5 Preview's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next