Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Muse Spark Open

Muse Spark Open leads Claude Sonnet 4.5 on coding, 47.4 to 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Muse Spark Open costs 3.5x less per output token ($4.25 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
Coding
39.5
Overall
49.5
Output $/M
$15.00
0
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
44.9
Output $/M
$4.25
7
vs boards won of 7 shared

Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Muse Spark Open: which to pick

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.5 for Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
7
Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
88
Muse Spark Open only
21
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 4.5 39.5 from 3 benchmarks, Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 28.2 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Claude Sonnet 4.5 22.6% against Muse Spark Open 76.2%, 53.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 4.5 $15.00 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 4.5 takes 1M tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.5BarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Web design02
All shared boards07
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
SWE-bench Verified74.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev13941528Muse Spark Open
AA Coding Index52.1Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)73.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)70.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)22.6%76.2%Muse Spark Open
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
SciCodeNot measured58.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Terminal-Bench46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GSO-Bench14.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
WeirdML47.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Cybench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1590.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena Text: coding1488Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1473Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React13861529Muse Spark Open
LMArena WebDev: HTML13991495Muse Spark Open
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.7Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index146.7155.1Muse Spark Open
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
AA Agentic Index15.8Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1060Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1050Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1137Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured25.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
METR time horizons67.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Remote Labor Index2.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GDPval42.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench52.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
OSWorld62.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,839Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)73.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
GPQA Diamond81.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured43.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)82.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-213.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SimpleBench54.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles17.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
EBR-bench2.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
VPCT39.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1462Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1483Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1471Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
AIME88.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)94.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIME77.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 323.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ProofBench19.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MATH level 597.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1449Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1462Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
MMLU Pro87.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)62.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)94.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified30.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1448Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1444Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1451Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1440Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite40.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websites11891310Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: UI components1170Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev11661282Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: data viz1167Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1157Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1182Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1115Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1205Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
Vals IndexNot measured48.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
SAGE (Vals AI)36.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured78.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
DTBench83.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMCA38.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text1438Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1459Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1442Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1450Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1425Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1460Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1427Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1390Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1402Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1459Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1458Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1437Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1423Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1465Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1475Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1442Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1428Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Document1450Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.011Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.195Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.750Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5Meta Muse Spark Open
MakerAnthropicMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025October 15, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$3.00$1.25
Output $/Mtok$15.00$4.25
Coding index39.547.4
Independent measurements behind it34
Cost per solved task$1.16Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.5 for Claude Sonnet 4.5. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Muse Spark Open?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark Open's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-sonnet-4-5-vs-meta-muse-spark-open" title="Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Muse Spark Open, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-sonnet-4-5-vs-meta-muse-spark-open">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Muse Spark Open</a></p>