Claude Opus 5.5 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Updated October 21, 2026. 28 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
vs boards won of 28 shared
Decision reading
Pick Claude Opus 5.5 for coding: it scores 92.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.8 for Beam 1.0 501B A23B.
Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B when output tokens cost 20.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 1M tokens.
Model AClaude Opus 5.5Anthropic92.2/1002 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved taskModel BBeam 1.0 501B A23BReflection33.8/1001 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved task
- Shared results
- 28
- Claude Opus 5.5 only
- 79
- Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
- 0
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5 scores 92.2 against 33.8.
2 and 1 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Claude Opus 5.5 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 57.6.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5 leads, 1335 against 1253.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Claude Opus 5.5 has a Vals Index result, 70.2%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Beam 1.0 501B A23B takes 1.05M tokens against 1M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Claude Opus 5.5 $0.014, Beam 1.0 501B A23B $0.0008 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Opus 5.5 92.2 from 2 benchmarks, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 33.8 from 1 benchmark.
- Widest category
- Coding, 26.3 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LMArena WebDev: Claude Opus 5.5 1807 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1437, 52.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Opus 5.5 $20.00 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.00 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Opus 5.5 takes 1M tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Opus 5.5 | Bars | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 5 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 3 | 0 | ||
| Math | 2 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 2 | 0 | ||
| General | 12 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 28 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 96.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1807 | 1437 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 65.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 90.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 66.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 18.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 95.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 87.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 70.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 30.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 74.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| SciCode | 66.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| FrontierCode | 54.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| FrontierSWE | 62.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| MirrorCode | 77.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2147.4 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1545 | 1473 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1538 | 1461 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1855 | 1443 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1753 | 1436 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1753 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 57.6 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 168.8 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1316 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1311 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1359 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LiveBench research | 85.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LiveBench browser | 80.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 85.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 33.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 58.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 45.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 50.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 9.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 75.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 79.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 47.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Vals Science Index | 58.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | 91.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| CUA-bench (Vals AI) | 14.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Robo-bench (Vals AI) | 14.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 73.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Remote Labor Index | 21.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| SpireClimb | 3.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $9,235 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Search | 1213 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | 92.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 49.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 61.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 90.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI | 98.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 93.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 67.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 71.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| EBR-bench | 71.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1536 | 1442 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1549 | 1447 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1535 | 1451 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1345 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1362 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 91.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 95.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| ProofBench | 100.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1518 | 1459 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1516 | 1475 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 49.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 72.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1524 | 1430 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1509 | 1376 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1518 | 1433 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1494 | 1430 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1335 | 1253 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1390 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1457 | 1222 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1397 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1477 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1390 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1332 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LiveBench design | 86.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index120
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 70.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | 80.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 70.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 45.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 91.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 84.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| DTBench | 98.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMCA | 68.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Furniture assembly | 83.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1516 | 1425 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1537 | 1430 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1535 | 1390 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Vision | 1321 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1519 | 1436 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1507 | 1413 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1582 | 1424 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1534 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1493 | 1461 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1508 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1517 | 1412 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1501 | 1414 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1532 | 1429 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1532 | 1400 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1515 | 1399 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1317 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1326 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1320 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Claude Opus 5.5$0.014Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0008Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Claude Opus 5.5$0.260Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.018Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Claude Opus 5.5$1.00Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.070Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 | Reflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Reflection |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | September 22, 2026 | October 16, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $4.00 | $0.30 |
| Output $/Mtok | $20.00 | $1.00 |
| Coding index | 92.2 | 33.8 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?
Pick Claude Opus 5.5 for coding: it scores 92.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.8 for Beam 1.0 501B A23B. Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B when output tokens cost 20.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 1M tokens.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.30 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 5.5 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?
28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Opus 5.5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.