Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs 2.3x less per output token than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ($1.10 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 25 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
49.0
Overall
49.8
Output $/M
$2.50
12
R Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
13
vs boards won of 25 shared

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Beam 1.0 501B A23B: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a coding score, 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Beam 1.0 501B A23B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($1.10 vs $2.50 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
25
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only
60
Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
3
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 49.0 from 3 benchmarks, Beam 1.0 501B A23B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 5.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 1438 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1376, 10.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $2.50 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.10 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBarsBeam 1.0 501B A23BTies
Coding04
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge22
General102
All shared boards1213
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena WebDev14351437Beam 1.0 501B A23B
AA Coding Index49.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)75.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)37.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Code migration (Vals AI)6.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)50.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)59.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SciCode41.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
WeirdML39.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ALE-Bench765.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: coding14531473Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: software and IT14511461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena WebDev: React14081443Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1436Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1448Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SciCode6.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.2Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Agentic Index14.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)47.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)7.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)13.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)43.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
APEX-Agents29.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
GPQA Diamond83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)18.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)83.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGI53.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGI-210.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Chess puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Mystery game puzzles19.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14411442Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: expert14341447Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14401451Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Vision: diagrams1284Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: homework1291Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME71.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 326.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tier 40.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProofBench13.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: math14341459Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14331475Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: science14511430Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14381376Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: legal and government14311433Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: business and finance14231430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
FACTS Benchmark Suite53.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1250Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1224Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index102
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SAGE (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)70.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)76.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
DTBench83.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMCA37.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text14351425Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: instruction following14191430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: creative writing14211390Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision1269Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: English14381436Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: non-English14271413Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Chinese14681424Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: German1454Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1426Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Korean1407Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: French14511461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Russian14431412Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Polish1437Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14451414Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: longer queries14351429Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: writing and language14281400Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14141399Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: English1269Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1311Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1280Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: humor1287Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1260Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.0015Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0009Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.022Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.021Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.085Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.081Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteReflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B
MakerGoogleReflection
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 21, 2026October 16, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.35
Output $/Mtok$2.50$1.10
Coding index49.0Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it31
Cost per solved task$0.41Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a coding score, 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Beam 1.0 501B A23B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($1.10 vs $2.50 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.35 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?

25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next