Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Hy4 preview

Claude Opus 4.8 leads Hy4 preview on coding, 65.0 to 44.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Hy4 preview costs 10.0x less per output token ($2.501 vs $25.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 18 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic
Coding
65.0
Overall
69.8
Output $/M
$25.00
8
Hy4 previewTencent
Coding
44.3
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.501
10
vs boards won of 18 shared

Claude Opus 4.8 or Hy4 preview: which to pick

Pick Claude Opus 4.8 for coding: it scores 65.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.3 for Hy4 preview.

Pick Hy4 preview for output tokens 10.0x cheaper ($2.501 vs $25.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Shared results
18
Claude Opus 4.8 only
112
Hy4 preview only
6
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.8 65.0 from 6 benchmarks, Hy4 preview 44.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 8.9 points apart on average over 8 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): Claude Opus 4.8 23.2% against Hy4 preview 8.1%, 20.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.8 $25.00 against Hy4 preview $2.501 per million output tokens, 10.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.8 takes 1M tokens, Hy4 preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.8BarsHy4 previewTies
Coding44
Agentic work23
Math01
Knowledge11
General11
All shared boards810
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index44
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4 previewLeader
LiveBench coding77.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena WebDev15561631Hy4 preview
AA Coding Index74.3Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)88.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)23.2%8.1%Claude Opus 4.8
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.7%77.5%Claude Opus 4.8
Code migration (Vals AI)47.3%47.4%Hy4 preview
ProgramBench (Vals AI)1.0%0.0%Claude Opus 4.8
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured59.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)71.9%55.1%Claude Opus 4.8
SkillsBench (Vals AI)59.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
SciCode54.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)58.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
FrontierCode46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
GSO-Bench47.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
WeirdML82.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: coding1490Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1488Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena WebDev: React15571653Hy4 preview
LMArena WebDev: HTML15431620Hy4 preview
SciCode12.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index41.8Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index159.0Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4 previewLeader
AA Agentic Index41.9Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1233Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1249Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1222Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1233Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1231Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1239Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1171Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1202Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1303Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LiveBench research81.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LiveBench browser96.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LiveBench long agentic48.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured2.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.9%55.1%Hy4 preview
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)30.0%32.6%Hy4 preview
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.8%45.2%Hy4 preview
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured8.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)69.4%58.1%Claude Opus 4.8
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%1.4%Claude Opus 4.8
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)11.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom94.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
APEX-Agents48.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Remote Labor Index8.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
OSWorld 2.020.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
DeepResearch Bench50.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
PostTrainBench33.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,787Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Search1204Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond92.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LiveBench reasoning89.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)86.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)48.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
ARC-AGI92.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
ARC-AGI-272.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SimpleBench64.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Chess puzzles52.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Mystery game puzzles36.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
EBR-bench28.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1482Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: expert1503Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1487Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1315Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1337Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark88.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4 previewLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 380.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
FrontierMath, tier 456.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
ProofBench69.0%75.0%Hy4 preview
LMArena Text: math1486Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1497Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4 previewLeader
MMLU Pro89.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.6%83.8%Hy4 preview
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)69.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)53.2%43.3%Claude Opus 4.8
SimpleQA Verified53.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: science1477Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1464Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1477Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1458Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite53.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1258Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: UI components1255Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: game dev1264Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: data viz1240Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: 3D1222Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1255Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: SVG1195Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1277Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LiveBench design78.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4 previewLeader
Vals IndexNot measured53.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
LiveBench data analysis66.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)68.1%68.6%Hy4 preview
SAGE (Vals AI)54.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.8%83.6%Claude Opus 4.8
Vals Multimodal Index70.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
IFBench62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
DTBench94.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMCA57.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Surface Evolver Bench87.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Furniture assembly42.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text1461Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1476Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1454Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision1294Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: English1468Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1450Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1506Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: German1472Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1442Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1431Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: French1481Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1465Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1474Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1459Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1476Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1483Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1461Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1440Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: English1293Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1346Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1303Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1282Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1301Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Document1475Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.8$0.018Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.0021Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.8$0.325Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.049Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.8$1.25Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.192Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4 preview
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.8Tencent Hy4 preview
MakerAnthropicTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 27, 2026August 28, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.834
Output $/Mtok$25.00$2.501
Coding index65.044.3
Independent measurements behind it63
Cost per solved task$2.17Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.8 better than Hy4 preview for coding?

Pick Claude Opus 4.8 for coding: it scores 65.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.3 for Hy4 preview. Pick Hy4 preview for output tokens 10.0x cheaper ($2.501 vs $25.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Hy4 preview?

Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview costs $0.834 and $2.501. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Opus 4.8 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.8 or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.8 vs Hy4 preview comparison based on?

18 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.8's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Hy4 preview's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-opus-4-8-vs-tencent-hy4-preview" title="Claude Opus 4.8 vs Hy4 preview, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-8-vs-tencent-hy4-preview">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Opus 4.8 vs Hy4 preview</a></p>