Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Hy4

Hy4 leads Claude Opus 4.8 on coding, 65.2 to 62.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Hy4 costs 20.0x less per output token ($1.2505 vs $25.00 per million). Updated November 5, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic
Coding
62.8
Overall
68.2
Output $/M
$25.00
2
Hy4Tencent
Coding
65.2
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.2505
2
vs boards won of 4 shared

Claude Opus 4.8 or Hy4: which to pick

Pick Hy4 for coding: it scores 65.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 62.8 for Claude Opus 4.8, though on 2 benchmarks against 5.

Pick Claude Opus 4.8 for work measured by Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
4
Claude Opus 4.8 only
130
Hy4 only
2
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.8 62.8 from 5 benchmarks, Hy4 65.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 11.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): Claude Opus 4.8 23.2% against Hy4 39.4%, 21.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.8 $25.00 against Hy4 $1.2505 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.8 takes 1M tokens, Hy4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.8BarsHy4Ties
Coding11
Agentic work11
All shared boards22
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4Leader
LMArena WebDev1556Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
AA Coding Index74.3Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)88.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)23.2%39.4%Hy4
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.7%81.0%Claude Opus 4.8
Code migration (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)1.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)71.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)59.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SciCode54.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)58.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
FrontierCode46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
GSO-Bench47.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
WeirdML82.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: coding1491Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1488Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1557Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1543Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SciCode12.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA57.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SWE Atlas: Refactoring46.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SWE Atlas: Test Writing49.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
GameBench 262.4Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.178.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench 3.021.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.023.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
ProgramBench0.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4Leader
Epoch Capabilities Index159.9Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4Leader
AA Agentic Index41.9Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1220Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1245Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1216Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1234Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1231Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1181Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1117Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1183Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1214Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)30.0%34.4%Hy4
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.8%41.4%Claude Opus 4.8
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured12.5%Only Hy4 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)11.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom94.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
APEX-Agents48.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Remote Labor Index8.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
OSWorld 2.020.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
DeepResearch Bench50.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
PostTrainBench33.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,787Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Search1204Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MCP Atlas82.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Toolathlon-Verified76.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
τ³-Banking39.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4Leader
GPQA Diamond92.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)86.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)48.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
ARC-AGI92.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
ARC-AGI-272.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SimpleBench64.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Chess puzzles52.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Mystery game puzzles36.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
EBR-bench28.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1482Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: expert1503Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1487Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1315Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1337Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark88.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4Leader
OTIS Mock AIME98.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 380.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
FrontierMath, tier 456.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
ProofBench69.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: math1485Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1497Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MathArena39.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4Leader
MMLU Pro89.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)69.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)53.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SimpleQA Verified53.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: science1477Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1464Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1477Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1458Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite59.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4Leader
Design Arena: websites1258Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: UI components1255Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: game dev1263Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: data viz1240Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: 3D1220Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1254Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: SVG1191Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1274Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index35 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4Leader
Vals IndexNot measured59.4%Only Hy4 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)68.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Vals Multimodal Index70.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
IFBench62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
DTBench94.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMCA57.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Surface Evolver Bench87.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Furniture assembly42.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text1461Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1477Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1455Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision1294Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: English1469Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1450Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1507Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: German1471Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1442Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1431Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: French1480Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1465Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1475Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1458Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1476Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1484Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1462Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1441Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: English1293Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1346Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1303Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1282Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1301Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Document1475Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
EQ-Bench 41268Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Hy4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.8$0.018Fits in one request
Hy4$0.0010Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.8$0.325Fits in one request
Hy4$0.025Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.8$1.25Fits in one request
Hy4$0.096Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.8 and Hy4
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.8Tencent Hy4
MakerAnthropicTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 27, 2026November 4, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.417
Output $/Mtok$25.00$1.2505
Coding index62.865.2
Independent measurements behind it52
Cost per solved task$2.17Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.8 better than Hy4 for coding?

Pick Hy4 for coding: it scores 65.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 62.8 for Claude Opus 4.8, though on 2 benchmarks against 5. Pick Claude Opus 4.8 for work measured by Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Hy4?

Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Hy4 costs $0.417 and $1.2505. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Opus 4.8 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.8 or Hy4?

Hy4, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.8 vs Hy4 comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 5, 2026. Claude Opus 4.8's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Hy4's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-opus-4-8-vs-tencent-hy4" title="Claude Opus 4.8 vs Hy4, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-8-vs-tencent-hy4">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Opus 4.8 vs Hy4</a></p>