LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Updated October 21, 2026. 59 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Replace Claude Opus 4.6 Replace MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
Coding
66.9
Overall
31.9
Output $/M
$25.00
56
MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi
Coding
40.0
Overall
26.0
Output $/M
$0.609
3
vs boards won of 59 shared

Decision reading

Pick Claude Opus 4.6 for coding: it scores 66.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 40.0 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro when output tokens cost 41.1x less, or when a solved task costs $0.03 against $1.56.

Model AClaude Opus 4.6Anthropic66.9/1002 independent benchmarks$1.56 per solved taskModel BMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi40.0/1001 independent benchmark$0.03 per solved task
Shared results
59
Claude Opus 4.6 only
49
MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
11
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.6 66.9 from 2 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 40.0 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Math, 13.3 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: Claude Opus 4.6 50.0% against MiMo-V2.5-Pro 22.0%, 28.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.6 $25.00 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.609 per million output tokens, 41.1x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.6 takes 1M tokens, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.6BarsMiMo-V2.5-ProTies
Coding90
Intelligence10
Agentic work01
Reasoning60
Math30
Knowledge90
Web design80
General202
All shared boards563
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index90
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
SWE-bench Verified75.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual72.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev15471480Claude Opus 4.6
AA Coding IndexNot measured60.2Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.7%81.3%Claude Opus 4.6
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.2%74.0%Claude Opus 4.6
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)57.6%34.1%Claude Opus 4.6
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured21.6%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured57.3%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
SciCodeNot measured50.6%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)48.5%43.2%Claude Opus 4.6
Terminal-Bench79.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FrontierCode26.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
GSO-Bench41.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
WeirdML78.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Cybench93.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured899.8Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
LMArena Text: coding15341501Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: software and IT15271495Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena WebDev: React15391469Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena WebDev: HTML15591473Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena WebDev: from an image1543Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
AA Intelligence Index31.926.0Claude Opus 4.6
Epoch Capabilities Index155.7Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured21.3Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1206Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1220Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1207Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1204Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1214Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured41.5%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured11.5%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.9%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured55.2%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
τ²-Bench Telecom92.1%94.2%MiMo-V2.5-Pro
APEX-Agents46.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
METR time horizons78.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Remote Labor Index4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
DeepResearch Bench55.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2$8,018Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
GPQA Diamond89.7%82.6%Claude Opus 4.6
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.6%86.6%Claude Opus 4.6
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.9%35.7%Claude Opus 4.6
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI94.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-269.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SimpleBench67.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Chess puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzles25.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
EBR-bench12.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15251486Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: expert15441501Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15301494Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Vision: diagrams1340Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1337Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
OTIS Mock AIME94.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 366.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ProofBench50.0%22.0%Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: math15181481Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: mathematical work15251491Claude Opus 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index90
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
MMLU Pro89.1%84.6%Claude Opus 4.6
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.3%77.1%Claude Opus 4.6
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)67.0%61.4%Claude Opus 4.6
TaxEval (Vals AI)76.0%73.8%Claude Opus 4.6
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)95.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)49.1%32.5%Claude Opus 4.6
SimpleQA Verified47.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: science15191482Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare15041473Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: legal and government15121474Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: business and finance14971466Claude Opus 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
Design Arena: websites12911267Claude Opus 4.6
Design Arena: UI components12841248Claude Opus 4.6
Design Arena: game dev12781261Claude Opus 4.6
Design Arena: data viz12791257Claude Opus 4.6
Design Arena: 3D12741244Claude Opus 4.6
Design Arena: all code categories12891266Claude Opus 4.6
Design Arena: SVG12271181Claude Opus 4.6
Design Arena: ASCII art12541157Claude Opus 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index202
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)51.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.7%83.7%Claude Opus 4.6
IFBench53.1%79.9%MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.0%79.7%MiMo-V2.5-Pro
DTBench91.2%84.5%Claude Opus 4.6
LMCA55.8%29.5%Claude Opus 4.6
CL-bench20.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Furniture assembly28.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CL-bench Life17.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text15011464Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: instruction following15211475Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: creative writing15051438Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Vision1316Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: English15111477Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: non-English14881448Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: Chinese15511507Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: German15001459Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: Japanese14881410Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: Korean14641435Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: French15121487Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: Spanish15101469Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: Russian14971449Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: Polish14991464Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: multi-turn15111476Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: longer queries15181481Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: writing and language15021451Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14921438Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Vision: English1324Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1370Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1326Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1314Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1274Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1331Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Document1507Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$0.018Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5-Pro$0.0006Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$0.325Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5-Pro$0.017Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$1.25Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5-Pro$0.067Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.6Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MakerAnthropicXiaomi
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 4, 2026April 22, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.3045
Output $/Mtok$25.00$0.609
Coding index66.940.0
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved task$1.56$0.03
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.6 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro for coding?

Pick Claude Opus 4.6 for coding: it scores 66.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 40.0 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro when output tokens cost 41.1x less, or when a solved task costs $0.03 against $1.56.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.3045 and $0.609. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Opus 4.6 costs $1.56 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.03.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.6 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro comparison based on?

59 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Opus 4.6's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.5-Pro's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next