Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Muse Spark Open

Claude Opus 4.6 leads Muse Spark Open on coding, 57.2 to 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Muse Spark Open costs 5.9x less per output token ($4.25 vs $25.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
Coding
57.2
Overall
66.0
Output $/M
$25.00
6
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
44.9
Output $/M
$4.25
5
vs boards won of 11 shared

Claude Opus 4.6 or Muse Spark Open: which to pick

Pick Claude Opus 4.6 for coding: it scores 57.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 47.4 for Muse Spark Open.

Pick Muse Spark Open for output tokens 5.9x cheaper ($4.25 vs $25.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Shared results
11
Claude Opus 4.6 only
99
Muse Spark Open only
17
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.6 57.2 from 4 benchmarks, Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 12.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Claude Opus 4.6 57.6% against Muse Spark Open 76.2%, 18.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.6 $25.00 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 5.9x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.6 takes 1M tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.6BarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Coding31
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning11
Web design02
General01
All shared boards65
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index31
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
SWE-bench Verified75.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual72.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev15471528Claude Opus 4.6
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)57.6%76.2%Muse Spark Open
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
SciCodeNot measured58.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)48.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench79.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FrontierCode26.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
GSO-Bench41.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
WeirdML78.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Cybench93.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1590.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena Text: coding1534Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1527Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: React15391529Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena WebDev: HTML15591495Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena WebDev: from an image1543Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index31.9Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index155.7155.1Claude Opus 4.6
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1206Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1220Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1207Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1197Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1212Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured25.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
τ²-Bench Telecom92.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
APEX-Agents46.3%33.4%Claude Opus 4.6
METR time horizons78.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Remote Labor Index4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
DeepResearch Bench55.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2$8,018Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
GPQA Diamond89.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.6%89.0%Claude Opus 4.6
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.9%43.9%Muse Spark Open
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI94.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-269.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SimpleBench67.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Chess puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzles25.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
EBR-bench12.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1525Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: expert1544Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1530Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1340Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1337Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
OTIS Mock AIME94.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 366.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ProofBench50.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: math1518Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1525Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
MMLU Pro89.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)76.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)95.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)49.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SimpleQA Verified47.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: science1519Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1504Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1512Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1497Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite41.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websites12911310Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: UI components1281Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: game dev12771282Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: data viz1279Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: 3D1273Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1288Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: SVG1227Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1255Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
Vals IndexNot measured48.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
SAGE (Vals AI)51.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
IFBench53.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.0%78.3%Muse Spark Open
DTBench91.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMCA55.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CL-bench20.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Furniture assembly28.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CL-bench Life17.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text1501Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1521Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1505Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision1316Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: English1511Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1488Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1551Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: German1500Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1488Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1464Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: French1512Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1510Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1497Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1499Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1511Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1518Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1502Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1492Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: English1324Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1370Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1326Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1314Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1274Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1331Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Document1507Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$0.018Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$0.325Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$1.25Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.6 and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.6Meta Muse Spark Open
MakerAnthropicMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 4, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$5.00$1.25
Output $/Mtok$25.00$4.25
Coding index57.247.4
Independent measurements behind it44
Cost per solved task$1.56Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.6 better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Pick Claude Opus 4.6 for coding: it scores 57.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 47.4 for Muse Spark Open. Pick Muse Spark Open for output tokens 5.9x cheaper ($4.25 vs $25.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Muse Spark Open?

Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Opus 4.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.6 or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.6 vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.6's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark Open's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-opus-4-6-vs-meta-muse-spark-open" title="Claude Opus 4.6 vs Muse Spark Open, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-6-vs-meta-muse-spark-open">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Opus 4.6 vs Muse Spark Open</a></p>