LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Updated October 21, 2026. 56 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic
Coding
66.8
Overall
29.1
Output $/M
$25.00
0
Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
79.7
Overall
48.1
Output $/M
$4.25
56
vs boards won of 56 shared

Decision reading

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 79.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 66.8 for Claude Opus 4.5.

Claude Opus 4.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
56
Claude Opus 4.5 only
49
Muse Spark 1.3 only
36
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.5 66.8 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.3 79.7 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 21.1 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Claude Opus 4.5 20.6% against Muse Spark 1.3 82.9%, 62.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.5 $25.00 against Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 per million output tokens, 5.9x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.5 takes 200K tokens, Muse Spark 1.3 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.5BarsMuse Spark 1.3Ties
Coding06
Intelligence02
Agentic work03
Reasoning07
Math06
Knowledge04
Web design08
General020
All shared boards056
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
SWE-bench Verified79.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
SWE-bench (full test set)52.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual70.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured90.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev14941659Muse Spark 1.3
AA Coding IndexNot measured75.8Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)83.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)76.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured10.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)20.6%82.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured27.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured43.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured72.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)87.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
SciCodeNot measured59.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)47.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench63.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
FrontierSWENot measured25.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GSO-Bench26.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
WeirdML63.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Cybench82.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1688.3Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: coding15031510Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: software and IT14831511Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: React14781672Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: HTML15101653Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1640Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Intelligence Index29.148.1Muse Spark 1.3
Epoch Capabilities Index150.1157.2Muse Spark 1.3
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured55.5Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps11591297Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps11561295Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps11891217Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1181Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1241Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1244Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1048Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured68.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured80.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured40.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured58.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured62.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom89.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured58.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
METR time horizons75.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Remote Labor Index3.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
GDPval45.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
BALROG43.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench54.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
OSWorld66.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$4,967Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
GPQA Diamond85.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured89.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)86.6%94.1%Muse Spark 1.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)30.1%48.7%Muse Spark 1.3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-237.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
SimpleBench62.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles14.0%37.0%Muse Spark 1.3
Mystery game puzzles22.0%25.0%Muse Spark 1.3
EBR-bench14.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
VPCT40.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14761503Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: expert14871519Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14821500Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1330Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
AIME95.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)95.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
AA Math Index91.3Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)91.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIME86.1%99.2%Muse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 334.4%74.4%Muse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath, tier 44.9%46.3%Muse Spark 1.3
ProofBench36.0%58.0%Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: math14631497Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: mathematical work14681491Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
MMLU Pro87.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)95.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)49.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)89.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified45.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
GeoBench75.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science14541507Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14441493Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: legal and government14591499Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: business and finance14481490Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
Design Arena: websites12471356Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: UI components12381352Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: game dev12291329Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: data viz12431343Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: 3D12141359Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: all code categories12421353Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: SVG11801300Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: ASCII art11901280Muse Spark 1.3
LiveBench designNot measured74.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)52.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
IFBench58.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.3%83.0%Muse Spark 1.3
DTBench89.9%96.5%Muse Spark 1.3
LMCA44.5%53.9%Muse Spark 1.3
CL-bench21.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Furniture assembly28.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text14511490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: instruction following14781479Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: creative writing14451462Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena VisionNot measured1308Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: English14611495Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: non-English14381481Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Chinese14701532Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: German14491513Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Japanese14171470Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Korean14241490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: French14711511Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Spanish14571496Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Russian14471491Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Polish14391490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: multi-turn14661487Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: longer queries14791488Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: writing and language14521470Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14341457Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1298Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1384Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1319Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Document1462Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.5$0.018Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.5$0.325Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.5$1.25Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.5Meta Muse Spark 1.3
MakerAnthropicMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 24, 2025September 2, 2026
Context window200K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$5.00$1.25
Output $/Mtok$25.00$4.25
Coding index66.879.7
Independent measurements behind it22
Cost per solved task$1.37Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Muse Spark 1.3 for coding?

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 79.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 66.8 for Claude Opus 4.5. Claude Opus 4.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark 1.3?

Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Opus 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison based on?

56 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Opus 4.5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.3's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-opus-4-5-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-3" title="Claude Opus 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-5-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-3">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Opus 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3</a></p>