Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads Claude Opus 4.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 48.1 to 22.8, and Muse Spark 1.3 costs 17.6x less per output token ($4.25 vs $75.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 46 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic
Coding
No data
Overall
50.2
Output $/M
$75.00
0
Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
57.4
Overall
68.6
Output $/M
$4.25
46
vs boards won of 46 shared

Claude Opus 4.1 or Muse Spark 1.3: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Claude Opus 4.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
46
Claude Opus 4.1 only
27
Muse Spark 1.3 only
46
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.1 not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.3 57.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 31.3 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3: Claude Opus 4.1 12.6% against Muse Spark 1.3 74.4%, 61.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.1 $75.00 against Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 per million output tokens, 17.6x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.1 takes 200K tokens, Muse Spark 1.3 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.1BarsMuse Spark 1.3Ties
Coding04
Intelligence02
Reasoning04
Math05
Knowledge04
Web design08
General019
All shared boards046
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured90.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev13901659Muse Spark 1.3
AA Coding IndexNot measured75.8Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)66.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured10.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured82.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured27.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured43.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured72.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
SciCodeNot measured59.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench38.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
FrontierSWENot measured25.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
WeirdML45.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Cybench42.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1688.3Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: coding14791510Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: software and IT14561511Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1672Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML13991653Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1640Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
SciCode4.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Intelligence Index22.848.1Muse Spark 1.3
Epoch Capabilities Index144.1157.2Muse Spark 1.3
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured55.5Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1297Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1295Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1218Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1241Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1219Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1062Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured68.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured80.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured40.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured58.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured62.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured58.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
METR time horizons66.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
GDPval43.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
DeepResearch Bench48.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
GPQA Diamond76.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured89.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)77.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured94.1%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured48.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)77.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
SimpleBench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Mystery game puzzles21.0%25.0%Muse Spark 1.3
EBR-bench7.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
VPCT35.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14421503Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: expert14381519Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14511500Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1330Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
AIME78.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)95.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)94.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIME68.9%99.2%Muse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 312.6%74.4%Muse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%46.3%Muse Spark 1.3
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: math14311497Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: mathematical work14341491Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
MMLU Pro87.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)93.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: science14221507Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14161493Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: legal and government14211499Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: business and finance14061490Muse Spark 1.3
FACTS Benchmark Suite40.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
Design Arena: websites11761356Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: UI components11621349Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: game dev11711328Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: data viz11661343Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: 3D11521358Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: all code categories11701352Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: SVG11521301Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: ASCII art11671278Muse Spark 1.3
LiveBench designNot measured74.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index019
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)31.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)73.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured83.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
DTBench80.0%96.5%Muse Spark 1.3
LMCA37.1%53.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)84.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text14191490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: instruction following14351479Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: creative writing14121462Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena VisionNot measured1308Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: English14331495Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: non-English14051481Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Chinese14271532Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: German14131513Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Japanese13771470Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Korean13811490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: French14331511Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Spanish14481496Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Russian14221491Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Polish14131490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: multi-turn14441487Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: longer queries14551488Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: writing and language14181470Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13981457Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1298Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1384Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1319Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Muse Spark 1.3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.052Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.975Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$3.75Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.1 and Muse Spark 1.3
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.1Meta Muse Spark 1.3
MakerAnthropicMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 5, 2025September 2, 2026
Context window200K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$15.00$1.25
Output $/Mtok$75.00$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked57.4
Independent measurements behind it14
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Muse Spark 1.3 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Claude Opus 4.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Muse Spark 1.3?

Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00 per million input tokens and $75.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.1 or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison based on?

46 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Muse Spark 1.3's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next