Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Updated October 21, 2026. 57 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Replace Claude Opus 4.1 Replace Gemini 3.7 Flash

Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic

Coding: 27.2
Overall: 22.8
Output $/M: $75.00

Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle

Coding: 69.9
Overall: 39.6
Output $/M: $3.75

vs boards won of 57 shared

Decision reading

Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash for coding: it scores 69.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 27.2 for Claude Opus 4.1.

Claude Opus 4.1 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Model AClaude Opus 4.1Anthropic27.2/1001 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved task Model BGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle69.9/1002 independent benchmarks$1.78 per solved task

571455

Shared results: 57
Claude Opus 4.1 only: 14
Gemini 3.7 Flash only: 55
Like-for-like categories: 7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Gemini 3.7 Flash scores 69.9 against 27.2.
1 and 2 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Gemini 3.7 Flash leads, 39.6 against 22.8.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Gemini 3.7 Flash leads, 93.9% against 76.3%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.1 has a AIME result, 78.2%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Gemini 3.7 Flash leads, 90.1% against 87.9%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Gemini 3.7 Flash leads, 1304 against 1177.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Gemini 3.7 Flash takes 1.05M tokens against 200K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Claude Opus 4.1 $0.052, Gemini 3.7 Flash $0.0026 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Gemini 3.7 Flash has the number, $1.78.
Directional only

At a glance

Coding index: Claude Opus 4.1 27.2 from 1 benchmark, Gemini 3.7 Flash 69.9 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category: Math, 29.2 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap: FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3: Claude Opus 4.1 12.6% against Gemini 3.7 Flash 71.6%, 58.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price: Claude Opus 4.1 $75.00 against Gemini 3.7 Flash $3.75 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
Context window: Claude Opus 4.1 takes 200K tokens, Gemini 3.7 Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Category	Claude Opus 4.1	Bars	Gemini 3.7 Flash	Ties
Coding	0		5
Intelligence	0		2
Reasoning	0		7
Math	0		5
Knowledge	0		9
Web design	0		8
General	0		21
All shared boards	0		57

CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05

Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
Benchmark	Claude Opus 4.1	Gemini 3.7 Flash	Leader
LiveBench coding	Not measured	80.5%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev	1390	1591	Gemini 3.7 Flash
AA Coding Index	Not measured	71.5	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)	66.5%	88.7%	Gemini 3.7 Flash
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)	Not measured	80.8%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)	Not measured	12.1%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)	Not measured	70.4%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)	Not measured	34.8%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)	Not measured	0.0%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)	Not measured	67.8%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)	Not measured	77.5%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)	Not measured	65.9%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)	Not measured	43.8%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SciCode	Not measured	59.8%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench	38.0%	Not measured	Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured
FrontierCode	Not measured	43.6%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierSWE	Not measured	20.3%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
WeirdML	45.9%	Not measured	Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Cybench	42.0%	Not measured	Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured
ALE-Bench	Not measured	904.3	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding	1479	1499	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT	1456	1498	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena WebDev: React	Not measured	1587	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML	1399	1593	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena WebDev: from an image	Not measured	1599	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here

IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02

Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
Benchmark	Claude Opus 4.1	Gemini 3.7 Flash	Leader
AA Intelligence Index	22.8	39.6	Gemini 3.7 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index	144.1	158.0	Gemini 3.7 Flash

Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards, none shared

Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
Benchmark	Claude Opus 4.1	Gemini 3.7 Flash	Leader
Design Arena: agents building web apps	Not measured	1224	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps	Not measured	1208	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps	Not measured	1230	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps	Not measured	1247	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games	Not measured	1264	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building games	Not measured	1235	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets	Not measured	1028	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench research	Not measured	76.5%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench browser	Not measured	56.0%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench long agentic	Not measured	28.3%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)	Not measured	4.6%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)	Not measured	59.0%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)	Not measured	22.8%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)	Not measured	34.6%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)	Not measured	71.3%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)	Not measured	7.1%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
APEX-Agents	Not measured	67.8%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
METR time horizons	66.8%	Not measured	Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Remote Labor Index	Not measured	5.0%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
GDPval	43.6%	Not measured	Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured
DeepResearch Bench	48.3%	Not measured	Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here

ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07

Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
Benchmark	Claude Opus 4.1	Gemini 3.7 Flash	Leader
GPQA Diamond	76.3%	93.9%	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LiveBench reasoning	Not measured	87.8%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)	77.5%	89.0%	Gemini 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)	Not measured	94.5%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)	Not measured	47.9%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)	77.3%	94.8%	Gemini 3.7 Flash
ARC-AGI	Not measured	95.5%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-2	Not measured	84.6%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SimpleBench	60.0%	Not measured	Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Chess puzzles	Not measured	66.0%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles	21.0%	37.0%	Gemini 3.7 Flash
EBR-bench	7.9%	Not measured	Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured
VPCT	35.0%	Not measured	Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts	1442	1495	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: expert	1438	1512	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English	1451	1487	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams	Not measured	1329	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework	Not measured	1320	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here

MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05

Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
Benchmark	Claude Opus 4.1	Gemini 3.7 Flash	Leader
AIME	78.2%	Not measured	Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)	95.4%	Not measured	Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)	94.4%	Not measured	Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIME	68.9%	97.2%	Gemini 3.7 Flash
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3	12.6%	71.6%	Gemini 3.7 Flash
FrontierMath, tier 4	2.4%	36.6%	Gemini 3.7 Flash
ProofBench	Not measured	58.0%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math	1431	1511	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work	1434	1502	Gemini 3.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here

KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index09

Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
Benchmark	Claude Opus 4.1	Gemini 3.7 Flash	Leader
MMLU Pro	87.9%	90.1%	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LegalBench (Vals AI)	83.5%	87.3%	Gemini 3.7 Flash
TaxEval (Vals AI)	73.7%	74.7%	Gemini 3.7 Flash
MortgageTax (Vals AI)	61.1%	66.7%	Gemini 3.7 Flash
MedQA (Vals AI)	93.6%	Not measured	Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)	47.2%	53.4%	Gemini 3.7 Flash
SimpleQA Verified	Not measured	69.2%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science	1422	1511	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare	1416	1494	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government	1421	1496	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance	1406	1479	Gemini 3.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here

Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08

Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
Benchmark	Claude Opus 4.1	Gemini 3.7 Flash	Leader
Design Arena: websites	1177	1304	Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: UI components	1164	1299	Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: game dev	1172	1318	Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: data viz	1166	1315	Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: 3D	1153	1308	Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: all code categories	1171	1308	Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: SVG	1152	1283	Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: ASCII art	1167	1276	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LiveBench design	Not measured	73.2%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured

GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index021

General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
Benchmark	Claude Opus 4.1	Gemini 3.7 Flash	Leader
LiveBench data analysis	Not measured	68.0%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)	31.4%	49.2%	Gemini 3.7 Flash
MedScribe (Vals AI)	73.9%	83.9%	Gemini 3.7 Flash
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)	Not measured	83.0%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
DTBench	80.0%	96.8%	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMCA	37.1%	50.4%	Gemini 3.7 Flash
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)	84.7%	Not measured	Only Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Furniture assembly	Not measured	26.7%	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text	1419	1489	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following	1435	1484	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing	1412	1488	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision	Not measured	1314	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English	1433	1483	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English	1405	1487	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese	1427	1552	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: German	1413	1506	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese	1377	1511	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean	1381	1481	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: French	1433	1500	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish	1448	1495	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian	1422	1515	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish	1413	1503	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn	1444	1485	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries	1455	1492	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language	1418	1491	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media	1398	1477	Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: English	Not measured	1309	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese	Not measured	1394	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text	Not measured	1322	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor	Not measured	1299	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing	Not measured	1312	Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here

Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared

Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
Benchmark	Claude Opus 4.1	Gemini 3.7 Flash	Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.052Fits in one request

Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.0026Fits in one request

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.975Fits in one request

Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.049Fits in one request

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$3.75Exceeds the context window

Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.188Fits in one request

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
Specification	Anthropic Claude Opus 4.1	Google Gemini 3.7 Flash
Maker	Anthropic	Google
Weights	No public weights listed	No public weights listed
Released	August 5, 2025	August 13, 2026
Context window	200K	1.05M
Input $/Mtok	$15.00	$0.75
Output $/Mtok	$75.00	$3.75
Coding index	27.2	69.9
Independent measurements behind it	1	2
Cost per solved task	Not computable	$1.78
Source	OpenRouter listing	OpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Gemini 3.7 Flash for coding?

Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash for coding: it scores 69.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 27.2 for Claude Opus 4.1. Claude Opus 4.1 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00 per million input tokens and $75.00 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75 and $3.75. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.7 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.1 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash comparison based on?

57 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Opus 4.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Gemini 3.7 Flash's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Decision reading

Which one for your work

Coding

Intelligence

Reasoning

Math

Knowledge

Web design

Long documents

Everyday cost

Cost per solved task

At a glance

Benchmark by benchmark

What each workload costs

Chat turn

Repository review

Agent loop

Specification differences

Questions

Compare next