Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs o3

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads o3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 43.4 to 20.2, and Claude Haiku 5.5 costs 16.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $8.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 23 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
Coding
70.7
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.50
21
o3OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
51.1
Output $/M
$8.00
1
vs boards won of 23 shared, 1 tied

Claude Haiku 5.5 or o3: which to pick

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 has a coding score, 70.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; o3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick o3 for work measured by SimpleQA Verified, where it leads.

Shared results
23
Claude Haiku 5.5 only
40
o3 only
79
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 5.5 70.7 from 5 benchmarks, o3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 28.3 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI-2: Claude Haiku 5.5 61.3% against o3 6.5%, 54.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.50 against o3 $8.00 per million output tokens, 16.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1M tokens, o3 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 5.5Barso3Ties
Coding001 tie
Intelligence20
Reasoning60
Math20
Knowledge11
Web design50
General50
All shared boards2111 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index00
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5o3Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured81.3%Only o3 measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured58.4%Only o3 measured
SWE-bench MultimodalNot measured36.0%Only o3 measured
LiveBench coding91.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1586Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.9%Only o3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)36.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)44.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)20.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)75.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.8%Only o3 measured
SciCode55.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured37.1%Only o3 measured
FrontierCode46.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierSWE43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
GSO-BenchNot measured8.8%Only o3 measured
WeirdMLNot measured52.4%Only o3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured933.5Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1407Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1415Only o3 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1605Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1569Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SciCode9.2%9.2%Tie
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5o3Leader
AA Intelligence Index43.420.2Claude Haiku 5.5
Epoch Capabilities Index159.3146.7Claude Haiku 5.5
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5o3Leader
LiveBench research81.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic57.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)54.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)59.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vals Science Index38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured80.7%Only o3 measured
APEX-Agents56.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
METR time horizonsNot measured65.4%Only o3 measured
GDPvalNot measured30.8%Only o3 measured
DeepResearch BenchNot measured45.2%Only o3 measured
OSWorldNot measured23.0%Only o3 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,602Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured63.0%Only o3 measured
BrowseComp-PlusNot measured65.9%Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5o3Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured84.1%Only o3 measured
LiveBench reasoning82.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only o3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.7%Only o3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.4%20.1%Claude Haiku 5.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.6%81.8%Claude Haiku 5.5
ARC-AGI89.0%60.8%Claude Haiku 5.5
ARC-AGI-261.3%6.5%Claude Haiku 5.5
SimpleBenchNot measured53.1%Only o3 measured
Chess puzzles55.0%37.0%Claude Haiku 5.5
Mystery game puzzles30.0%29.0%Claude Haiku 5.5
EBR-bench43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
VPCTNot measured52.0%Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1402Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1402Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1411Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1220Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1234Only o3 measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured67.6%Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5o3Leader
AIMENot measured85.3%Only o3 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured94.6%Only o3 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured91.8%Only o3 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured88.3Only o3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured88.3%Only o3 measured
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%84.4%Claude Haiku 5.5
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 375.1%33.3%Claude Haiku 5.5
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProofBench89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MATH level 5Not measured97.8%Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1426Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1423Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5o3Leader
MMLU ProNot measured85.6%Only o3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.8%Only o3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only o3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.6%Only o3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.7%Only o3 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured96.1%Only o3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)51.5%47.3%Claude Haiku 5.5
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.3%Only o3 measured
SimpleQA Verified23.8%49.4%o3
GeoBenchNot measured74.0%Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1429Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1448Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1428Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1393Only o3 measured
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured44.4%Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5o3Leader
Design Arena: websites12621036Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: UI components12911017Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: game dev13131034Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: data viz12941200Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: 3D1342Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories12781020Claude Haiku 5.5
LiveBench design83.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5o3Leader
Vals Index58.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench data analysis53.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)63.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)45.8%41.8%Claude Haiku 5.5
MedScribe (Vals AI)89.5%76.7%Claude Haiku 5.5
IFBenchNot measured71.4%Only o3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%74.7%Claude Haiku 5.5
DTBench95.0%84.8%Claude Haiku 5.5
LMCA51.1%39.7%Claude Haiku 5.5
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured88.9%Only o3 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured83.9%Only o3 measured
CL-benchNot measured17.8%Only o3 measured
Furniture assembly47.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1410Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1368Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1359Only o3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1214Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1417Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1401Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1437Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1420Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1403Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1370Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1430Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1395Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1406Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1438Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1405Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1372Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1372Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1373Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1221Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1237Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1218Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1222Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1210Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1234Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1201Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5o3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0003Fits in one request
o3$0.0060Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0065Fits in one request
o3$0.124Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.025Fits in one request
o3$0.480Exceeds the context window

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 5.5 and o3
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 5.5OpenAI o3
MakerAnthropicOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 7, 2026April 16, 2025
Context window1M200K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.50$8.00
Coding index70.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.571
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than o3 for coding?

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 has a coding score, 70.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; o3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick o3 for work measured by SimpleQA Verified, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or o3?

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; o3 costs $2.00 and $8.00. Cost per solved task is known for o3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or o3?

Claude Haiku 5.5, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 5.5 vs o3 comparison based on?

23 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Haiku 5.5's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and o3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next