LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Updated October 21, 2026. 26 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
Coding
75.9
Overall
43.4
Output $/M
$0.50
26
Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI
Coding
9.2
Overall
14.2
Output $/M
$7.50
0
vs boards won of 26 shared

Decision reading

Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 for coding: it scores 75.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 9.2 for Mistral Medium 3.5.

Mistral Medium 3.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
26
Claude Haiku 5.5 only
36
Mistral Medium 3.5 only
54
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 5.5 75.9 from 2 benchmarks, Mistral Medium 3.5 9.2 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Math, 80.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Claude Haiku 5.5 90.4% against Mistral Medium 3.5 2.9%, 87.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.50 against Mistral Medium 3.5 $7.50 per million output tokens, 15.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1M tokens, Mistral Medium 3.5 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 5.5BarsMistral Medium 3.5Ties
Coding60
Intelligence20
Agentic work40
Reasoning10
Math10
Knowledge10
Web design60
General50
All shared boards260
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index60
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral Medium 3.5Leader
LiveBench coding91.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev15861264Claude Haiku 5.5
AA Coding IndexNot measured46.9Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured66.4%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)36.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)90.4%2.9%Claude Haiku 5.5
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%5.1%Claude Haiku 5.5
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)44.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)20.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)75.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SciCode55.0%40.2%Claude Haiku 5.5
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
FrontierCode46.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierSWE43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured764.0Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1460Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1458Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16051254Claude Haiku 5.5
LMArena WebDev: HTML15691308Claude Haiku 5.5
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral Medium 3.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index43.414.2Claude Haiku 5.5
Epoch Capabilities Index159.3141.4Claude Haiku 5.5
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral Medium 3.5Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured7.0Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LiveBench research81.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic57.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)54.1%32.1%Claude Haiku 5.5
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.9%4.5%Claude Haiku 5.5
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.3%9.1%Claude Haiku 5.5
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)59.0%11.2%Claude Haiku 5.5
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vals Science Index38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured94.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
APEX-Agents56.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,602Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral Medium 3.5Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured34.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LiveBench reasoning82.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured74.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.4%13.8%Claude Haiku 5.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Chess puzzles55.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles30.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
EBR-bench43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1436Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1432Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1445Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1254Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1230Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral Medium 3.5Leader
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 375.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProofBench89.0%9.0%Claude Haiku 5.5
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1431Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1440Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral Medium 3.5Leader
MMLU ProNot measured75.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured44.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured58.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured68.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured28.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)51.5%33.8%Claude Haiku 5.5
SimpleQA Verified23.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1428Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1409Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1437Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1426Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral Medium 3.5Leader
Design Arena: websites12631142Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: UI components12951079Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: game dev13151079Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: data viz12921120Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: 3D13431061Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: all code categories12791122Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: SVGNot measured949Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1062Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LiveBench design83.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral Medium 3.5Leader
Vals Index58.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench data analysis53.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)63.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)45.8%37.6%Claude Haiku 5.5
MedScribe (Vals AI)89.5%67.7%Claude Haiku 5.5
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured34.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured68.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%69.3%Claude Haiku 5.5
DTBench95.0%75.5%Claude Haiku 5.5
LMCA51.1%26.1%Claude Haiku 5.5
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured26.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Furniture assembly47.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1421Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1415Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1374Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1222Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1433Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1404Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1444Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1453Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1384Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1448Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1411Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1395Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1430Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1423Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1415Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1384Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1382Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1240Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1244Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1233Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1216Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1198Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral Medium 3.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0003Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.0053Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0065Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.098Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.025Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.375Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 5.5 and Mistral Medium 3.5
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 5.5Mistral Medium 3.5
MakerAnthropicMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 7, 2026April 30, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$1.50
Output $/Mtok$0.50$7.50
Coding index75.99.2
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computable$6.02
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Mistral Medium 3.5 for coding?

Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 for coding: it scores 75.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 9.2 for Mistral Medium 3.5. Mistral Medium 3.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 and $7.50. Cost per solved task is known for Mistral Medium 3.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Claude Haiku 5.5, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5 comparison based on?

26 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Haiku 5.5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3.5's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next