Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-5.4

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads GPT-5.4 on coding, 70.7 to 64.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Claude Haiku 5.5 costs 30.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
Coding
70.7
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.50
26
GPT-5.4OpenAI
Coding
64.4
Overall
69.6
Output $/M
$15.00
9
vs boards won of 35 shared

Claude Haiku 5.5 or GPT-5.4: which to pick

Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 for coding: it scores 70.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 64.4 for GPT-5.4.

Pick GPT-5.4 for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens) and work measured by Vending-Bench 2 or GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run), where it leads.

Shared results
35
Claude Haiku 5.5 only
28
GPT-5.4 only
75
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 5.5 70.7 from 5 benchmarks, GPT-5.4 64.4 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Knowledge, 15.8 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: 3D: Claude Haiku 5.5 1342 against GPT-5.4 1065, 34.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.50 against GPT-5.4 $15.00 per million output tokens, 30.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1M tokens, GPT-5.4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 5.5BarsGPT-5.4Ties
Coding60
Intelligence20
Agentic work11
Reasoning34
Math22
Knowledge11
Web design60
General51
All shared boards269
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index60
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.4Leader
LiveBench coding91.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev15861464Claude Haiku 5.5
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.1Only GPT-5.4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.1%Only GPT-5.4 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured78.2%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)36.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)90.4%67.4%Claude Haiku 5.5
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%35.0%Claude Haiku 5.5
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%0.5%Claude Haiku 5.5
IOI (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)44.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)20.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured51.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)75.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SciCode55.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured57.6%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured81.8%Only GPT-5.4 measured
FrontierCode46.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierSWE43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
GSO-BenchNot measured31.4%Only GPT-5.4 measured
WeirdMLNot measured77.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MirrorCodeNot measured15.6%Only GPT-5.4 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1607.0Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1496Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1491Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16051454Claude Haiku 5.5
LMArena WebDev: HTML15691478Claude Haiku 5.5
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1436Only GPT-5.4 measured
SciCode9.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.4Leader
AA Intelligence Index43.439.0Claude Haiku 5.5
Epoch Capabilities Index159.3157.3Claude Haiku 5.5
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.4Leader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1059Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1017Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1086Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1032Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1135Only GPT-5.4 measured
LiveBench research81.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic57.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)54.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)59.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vals Science Index38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured87.1%Only GPT-5.4 measured
APEX-Agents56.1%52.4%Claude Haiku 5.5
METR time horizonsNot measured74.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
DeepResearch BenchNot measured35.1%Only GPT-5.4 measured
PostTrainBenchNot measured19.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,602$6,144GPT-5.4
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index34
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.4Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured91.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LiveBench reasoning82.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured87.5%Only GPT-5.4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured92.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.4%43.7%Claude Haiku 5.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.6%93.3%GPT-5.4
ARC-AGI89.0%93.7%GPT-5.4
ARC-AGI-261.3%74.0%GPT-5.4
Chess puzzles55.0%48.0%Claude Haiku 5.5
Mystery game puzzles30.0%37.0%GPT-5.4
EBR-bench43.8%25.4%Claude Haiku 5.5
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1485Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1507Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1479Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1327Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1336Only GPT-5.4 measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured63.8%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.4Leader
AIMENot measured96.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%97.8%Claude Haiku 5.5
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 375.1%78.6%GPT-5.4
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%49.0%GPT-5.4
ProofBench89.0%56.0%Claude Haiku 5.5
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1488Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1497Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.4Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.5%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured63.8%Only GPT-5.4 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.0%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.3%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured96.1%Only GPT-5.4 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)51.5%41.3%Claude Haiku 5.5
SimpleQA Verified23.8%45.1%GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1479Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1458Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1486Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1474Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.4Leader
Design Arena: websites12621198Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: UI components12831213Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: game dev13151194Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: data viz12941196Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: 3D13421065Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: all code categories12771179Claude Haiku 5.5
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1141Only GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1188Only GPT-5.4 measured
LiveBench design83.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index51
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.4Leader
Vals Index58.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench data analysis53.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)63.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)45.8%43.3%Claude Haiku 5.5
MedScribe (Vals AI)89.5%77.5%Claude Haiku 5.5
IFBenchNot measured73.9%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%82.0%Claude Haiku 5.5
DTBench95.0%94.4%Claude Haiku 5.5
LMCA51.1%52.0%GPT-5.4
CL-benchNot measured27.9%Only GPT-5.4 measured
Furniture assembly47.5%37.5%Claude Haiku 5.5
CL-bench LifeNot measured21.7%Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1469Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1469Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1439Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1303Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1467Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1465Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1520Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1472Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1485Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1449Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1493Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1452Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1480Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1472Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1482Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1473Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1458Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1438Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1301Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1354Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1312Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1284Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1251Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1283Only GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1471Only GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.4
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0003Fits in one request
GPT-5.4$0.010Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0065Fits in one request
GPT-5.4$0.170Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.025Fits in one request
GPT-5.4$0.650Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.4
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 5.5OpenAI GPT-5.4
MakerAnthropicOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 7, 2026March 5, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$2.50
Output $/Mtok$0.50$15.00
Coding index70.764.4
Independent measurements behind it53
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.02
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than GPT-5.4 for coding?

Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 for coding: it scores 70.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 64.4 for GPT-5.4. Pick GPT-5.4 for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens) and work measured by Vending-Bench 2 or GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or GPT-5.4?

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 costs $2.50 and $15.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or GPT-5.4?

GPT-5.4, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-5.4 comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Haiku 5.5's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.4's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-vs-gpt-5-4" title="Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-5.4, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-vs-gpt-5-4">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-5.4</a></p>