Inkling Small vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads Inkling Small on coding, 31.6 to 27.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs 1.3x less per output token ($0.9152 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 56 benchmarks have a result for both.
Inkling Small or MiMo-V2.5-Pro: which to pick
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro for coding: it scores 31.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 27.3 for Inkling Small.
Pick Inkling Small for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 56
- Inkling Small only
- 28
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
- 14
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores 31.6 against 27.3.
4 benchmarks behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads, 26.0 against 25.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Inkling Small
Inkling Small leads, 23.5 against 21.3.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Inkling Small
Inkling Small leads, 83.6% against 82.6%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Inkling Small
Inkling Small leads, 85.6% against 84.6%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a Design Arena: websites result, 1266.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Inkling Small has a Vals Index result, 27.6%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro takes 1.05M tokens against 524K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Inkling Small $0.0010, MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.0009 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Inkling Small $0.16, MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.03.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Inkling Small 27.3 from 4 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 31.6 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 9.3 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI): Inkling Small 31.8% against MiMo-V2.5-Pro 55.2%, 23.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Inkling Small $1.20 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.9152 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
- Context window
- Inkling Small takes 524K tokens, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Inkling Small | Bars | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 11 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 3 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 2 | 4 | ||
| Math | 0 | 3 | ||
| Knowledge | 5 | 4 | ||
| General | 1 | 18 | ||
| All shared boards | 13 | 43 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index211
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1409 | 1480 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| AA Coding Index | 52.9 | 60.2 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 85.9% | 81.3% | Inkling Small |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 82.2% | 74.0% | Inkling Small |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 0.5% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 19.1% | 34.1% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 13.7% | 21.6% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.5% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 9.3% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 55.1% | 57.3% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 33.6% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 64.1% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| SciCode | 49.7% | 50.6% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 43.2% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 899.8 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1450 | 1501 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1447 | 1495 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1399 | 1469 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1398 | 1473 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1410 | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 25.7 | 26.0 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.3 | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 23.5 | 21.3 | Inkling Small |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 41.3% | 41.5% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 15.4% | 11.5% | Inkling Small |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 25.5% | 15.9% | Inkling Small |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 2.9% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 31.8% | 55.2% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 94.2% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.6% | 82.6% | Inkling Small |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 89.5% | 86.6% | Inkling Small |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 33.3% | 35.7% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 88.5% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| ARC-AGI | 84.0% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 40.1% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 6.0% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1423 | 1486 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1441 | 1501 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1429 | 1494 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1251 | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1257 | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 90.0% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 46.3% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 17.1% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| ProofBench | 6.0% | 22.0% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: math | 1459 | 1481 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1441 | 1491 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index54
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 85.6% | 84.6% | Inkling Small |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 83.0% | 77.1% | Inkling Small |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 69.6% | 61.4% | Inkling Small |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 75.5% | 73.8% | Inkling Small |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 62.3% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 37.9% | 32.5% | Inkling Small |
| SimpleQA Verified | 19.1% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1428 | 1482 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1413 | 1473 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1415 | 1474 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1413 | 1466 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1266 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1246 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1261 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1257 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1243 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1265 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1181 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1156 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index118
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 27.6% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 59.4% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 32.7% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 84.1% | 83.7% | Inkling Small |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 50.0% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 79.9% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 75.7% | 79.7% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| DTBench | Not measured | 84.5% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 29.5% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text | 1413 | 1464 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1399 | 1475 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1334 | 1438 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Vision | 1237 | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1421 | 1477 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1401 | 1448 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1464 | 1507 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: German | 1408 | 1459 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1401 | 1410 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1367 | 1435 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: French | 1435 | 1487 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1422 | 1469 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1394 | 1449 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1428 | 1464 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1416 | 1476 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1402 | 1481 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1357 | 1451 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1352 | 1438 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1243 | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1292 | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1243 | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1207 | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1205 | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Thinking Machines Inkling Small | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Thinking Machines | Xiaomi |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | July 30, 2026 | April 22, 2026 |
| Context window | 524K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.45 | $0.4575 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.20 | $0.9152 |
| Coding index | 27.3 | 31.6 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 4 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.16 | $0.03 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Inkling Small better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro for coding?
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro for coding: it scores 31.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 27.3 for Inkling Small. Pick Inkling Small for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Inkling Small or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Inkling Small costs $0.45 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.4575 and $0.9152. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Inkling Small costs $0.16 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.03.
Which has the bigger context window, Inkling Small or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.
How many benchmarks is the Inkling Small vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro comparison based on?
56 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Inkling Small's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.5-Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.