Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads MiMo-V2.6-Flash on coding, 62.4 to 54.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 21.4x less per output token ($0.28 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 60 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
62.4
Overall
68.9
Output $/M
$6.00
49
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
Coding
54.7
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$0.28
11
vs boards won of 60 shared

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) or MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which to pick

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding: it scores 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.7 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for output tokens 21.4x cheaper ($0.28 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Shared results
60
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
53
MiMo-V2.6-Flash only
6
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 62.4 from 5 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 54.7 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 9.4 points apart on average over 14 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
CyberBench (Vals AI): Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 28.6% against MiMo-V2.6-Flash 75.4%, 46.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 against MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.28 per million output tokens, 21.4x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) takes 1M tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.8 Max (0902)BarsMiMo-V2.6-FlashTies
Coding95
Intelligence10
Agentic work32
Reasoning70
Math21
Knowledge41
General232
All shared boards4911
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index95
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
LiveBench coding60.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev16741634Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
AA Coding Index76.2Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)85.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)34.3%24.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)64.7%79.0%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Code migration (Vals AI)24.0%40.9%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%0.5%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
IOI (Vals AI)68.9%47.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)67.4%76.4%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)42.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)12.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)42.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)28.6%75.4%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SciCode53.2%51.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FrontierSWE17.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1244.2Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding15021499Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: software and IT14981497Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: React16921648Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: HTML16491641Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: from an image16371596Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index45.437.9Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities Index157.4Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index56.0Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1300Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1305Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1224Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1196Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1234Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1233Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets967Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench research69.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browser32.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agentic42.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured4.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)50.6%56.3%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)32.1%28.5%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)47.6%38.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured13.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)60.1%65.5%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)12.9%4.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Vals Science IndexNot measured31.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
APEX-Agents63.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Search1261Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond93.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench reasoning88.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)23.9%21.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.1%35.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)92.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzles38.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14961475Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: expert15071496Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15031493Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: diagrams13231276Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: homework13361283Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 374.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBench58.0%63.0%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: math15011476Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: mathematical work14911478Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
MMLU Pro88.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedCode (Vals AI)40.7%41.1%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SimpleQA Verified47.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: science15121462Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare15031439Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: legal and government14921441Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: business and finance14801454Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1275Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: UI components1338Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: game dev1312Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: data viz1281Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: 3D1336Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: all code categories1293Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1200Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench design78.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index232
General benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Vals IndexNot measured54.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LiveBench data analysis78.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)67.1%67.6%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SAGE (Vals AI)51.2%43.5%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.0%85.3%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Vals Multimodal Index65.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.3%74.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
DTBench92.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMCA46.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Furniture assembly20.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text14831453Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: instruction following14811452Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: creative writing14771403Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision13131256Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: English14911476Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: non-English14731431Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Chinese15391509Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: German14781458Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Japanese14731359Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Korean14601425Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: French14981480Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Spanish14891453Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Russian14821409Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Polish14711455Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: multi-turn14891447Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: longer queries14881459Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: writing and language14771424Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14641415Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: English13111269Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: Chinese1358Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading text13221270Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: humor1304Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing13121231Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0078Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.031Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SpecificationQwen3.8 Max (0902)Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MakerQwenXiaomi
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 3, 2026September 21, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.14
Output $/Mtok$6.00$0.28
Coding index62.454.7
Independent measurements behind it53
Cost per solved task$1.32Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.8 Max (0902) better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding?

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding: it scores 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.7 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for output tokens 21.4x cheaper ($0.28 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison based on?

60 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.6-Flash's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/qwen3-8-max-0902-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-6-flash" title="Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/qwen3-8-max-0902-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-6-flash">LLMBenchmark.ai, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash</a></p>