Qwen3.6 Plus vs Inkling Small
Qwen3.6 Plus leads Inkling Small on coding, 44.1 to 27.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Inkling Small costs 1.6x less per output token ($1.20 vs $1.95 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 63 benchmarks have a result for both.
Qwen3.6 Plus or Inkling Small: which to pick
Pick Qwen3.6 Plus for coding: it scores 44.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 27.3 for Inkling Small, though on 3 benchmarks against 4.
Pick Inkling Small for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($1.20 vs $1.95 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.16 against $1.19).
- Shared results
- 63
- Qwen3.6 Plus only
- 20
- Inkling Small only
- 21
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.6 Plus scores 44.1 against 27.3.
3 and 4 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.6 Plus leads, 27.0 against 25.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Inkling Small has a AA Agentic Index result, 23.5.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.6 Plus leads, 87.4% against 83.6%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only Qwen3.6 Plus has a AIME result, 94.6%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.6 Plus leads, 87.7% against 85.6%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Qwen3.6 Plus has a Design Arena: websites result, 1243.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Inkling Small has a Vals Index result, 27.6%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.6 Plus takes 1M tokens against 524K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Inkling Small
Qwen3.6 Plus $0.0013, Inkling Small $0.0010 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
Inkling Small
Qwen3.6 Plus $1.19, Inkling Small $0.16.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Qwen3.6 Plus 44.1 from 3 benchmarks, Inkling Small 27.3 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Knowledge, 5.1 points apart on average over 11 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- SimpleQA Verified: Qwen3.6 Plus 44.1% against Inkling Small 19.1%, 25.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Qwen3.6 Plus $1.95 against Inkling Small $1.20 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
- Context window
- Qwen3.6 Plus takes 1M tokens, Inkling Small 524K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Qwen3.6 Plus | Bars | Inkling Small | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 9 | 4 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 3 | ||
| Reasoning | 5 | 3 | ||
| Math | 2 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 8 | 3 | ||
| General | 19 | 2 | ||
| All shared boards | 45 | 18 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index94
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1461 | 1409 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| AA Coding Index | 54.5 | 52.9 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 86.0% | 85.9% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 73.4% | 82.2% | Inkling Small |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 25.6% | 19.1% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 11.1% | 13.7% | Inkling Small |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 0.5% | Inkling Small |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 9.3% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 53.2% | 55.1% | Inkling Small |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 33.6% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 64.1% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 49.7% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 43.9% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| ALE-Bench | 670.1 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1467 | 1450 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1462 | 1447 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1454 | 1399 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1463 | 1398 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1472 | 1410 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 27.0 | 25.7 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.3 | 150.3 | Inkling Small |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 23.5 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 40.9% | 41.3% | Inkling Small |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 7.7% | 15.4% | Inkling Small |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 14.9% | 25.5% | Inkling Small |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 2.9% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 32.9% | 31.8% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 97.7% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $5,115 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index53
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.4% | 83.6% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 84.2% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 88.2% | 89.5% | Inkling Small |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 27.8% | 33.3% | Inkling Small |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 88.4% | 88.5% | Inkling Small |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 84.0% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 40.1% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Chess puzzles | 14.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 12.0% | 6.0% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1448 | 1423 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1454 | 1441 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1455 | 1429 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1251 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1257 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 94.6% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 93.3% | 90.0% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 38.2% | 46.3% | Inkling Small |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 17.1% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 6.0% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1449 | 1459 | Inkling Small |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1448 | 1441 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index83
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.7% | 85.6% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 84.2% | 83.0% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 51.5% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 61.9% | 69.6% | Inkling Small |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 74.7% | 75.5% | Inkling Small |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 68.0% | 62.3% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 36.9% | 37.9% | Inkling Small |
| SimpleQA Verified | 44.1% | 19.1% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: science | 1439 | 1428 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1442 | 1413 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1437 | 1415 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1430 | 1413 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1243 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1230 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1211 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1228 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1202 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1236 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1161 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1113 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index192
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 27.6% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 59.4% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 44.9% | 32.7% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 77.0% | 84.1% | Inkling Small |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 51.5% | 50.0% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| IFBench | 75.2% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 78.3% | 75.7% | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| DTBench | 81.9% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| LMCA | 33.1% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| CL-bench | 20.3% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured |
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1413 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1424 | 1399 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1404 | 1334 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1237 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1445 | 1421 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1424 | 1401 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1477 | 1464 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: German | 1451 | 1408 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1390 | 1401 | Inkling Small |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1379 | 1367 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: French | 1455 | 1435 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1432 | 1422 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1434 | 1394 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1433 | 1428 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1438 | 1416 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1439 | 1402 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1418 | 1357 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1402 | 1352 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1243 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1292 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1243 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1207 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1205 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Inkling Small costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Qwen3.6 Plus | Thinking Machines Inkling Small |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Qwen | Thinking Machines |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | April 2, 2026 | July 30, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 524K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.325 | $0.45 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.95 | $1.20 |
| Coding index | 44.1 | 27.3 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.19 | $0.16 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Qwen3.6 Plus better than Inkling Small for coding?
Pick Qwen3.6 Plus for coding: it scores 44.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 27.3 for Inkling Small, though on 3 benchmarks against 4. Pick Inkling Small for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($1.20 vs $1.95 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.16 against $1.19).
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 Plus or Inkling Small?
Qwen3.6 Plus costs $0.325 per million input tokens and $1.95 per million output tokens; Inkling Small costs $0.45 and $1.20. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Qwen3.6 Plus costs $1.19 and Inkling Small $0.16.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.6 Plus or Inkling Small?
Qwen3.6 Plus, with 1M tokens against 524K.
How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.6 Plus vs Inkling Small comparison based on?
63 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.6 Plus's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Inkling Small's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.