Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads Qwen3.5-Flash on coding, 67.1 to 41.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.5-Flash costs 23.1x less per output token ($0.26 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 52 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.5-FlashQwen
Coding
41.1
Overall
50.1
Output $/M
$0.26
2
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
67.1
Overall
70.1
Output $/M
$6.00
50
vs boards won of 52 shared

Qwen3.5-Flash or Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which to pick

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding: it scores 67.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 41.1 for Qwen3.5-Flash.

Pick Qwen3.5-Flash for output tokens 23.1x cheaper ($0.26 vs $6.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.40 against $1.32).

Shared results
52
Qwen3.5-Flash only
3
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
64
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5-Flash 41.1 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 67.1 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 32.7 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Qwen3.5-Flash 1229 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1690, 61.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.5-Flash $0.26 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 23.1x apart.
Context window
Both take 1M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.5-FlashBarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding07
Intelligence01
Reasoning08
Math04
Knowledge29
General021
All shared boards250
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index07
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev12441673Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
AA Coding IndexNot measured76.2Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)83.3%87.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)64.4%85.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured38.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured77.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured24.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured24.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SciCodeNot measured53.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ALE-Bench265.9Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding14121503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: software and IT14161498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: React12291690Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: HTML12911652Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured45.4Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Epoch Capabilities Index143.5157.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured56.0Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1300Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1305Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1224Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1194Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1226Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured995Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench researchNot measured69.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured42.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured49.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured72.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured63.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA Diamond82.8%93.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)81.9%88.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured92.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured43.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)82.3%92.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Chess puzzles14.0%46.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Mystery game puzzles20.0%38.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: hard prompts14031497Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: expert14071507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14091504Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AIME92.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
OTIS Mock AIME84.4%100.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 318.2%74.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: math14071501Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: mathematical work14131491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MathArenaNot measured51.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index29
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU Pro84.1%88.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.3%83.6%Qwen3.5-Flash
CaseLaw (Vals AI)56.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)63.6%65.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.2%75.5%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MortgageTax (Vals AI)67.4%64.0%Qwen3.5-Flash
MedCode (Vals AI)33.0%40.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SimpleQA Verified20.3%47.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: science14151512Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14071503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: legal and government13971494Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: business and finance13941481Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1276Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1282Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1338Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1293Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1200Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index021
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Vals IndexNot measured59.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)42.5%51.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MedScribe (Vals AI)70.6%85.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured80.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
DTBench82.9%92.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMCA29.1%46.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text13971484Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: instruction following13751481Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: creative writing13431477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena VisionNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: English14041492Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: non-English13851473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Chinese14461539Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: German13911476Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Japanese13691473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Korean13441462Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: French14131502Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Spanish13991487Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Russian13801482Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Polish13761471Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: multi-turn13931490Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: longer queries13921489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: writing and language13691477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13471464Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1311Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1358Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1304Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5-Flash$0.0002Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5-Flash$0.0040Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5-Flash$0.016Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5-Flash and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 25, 2026September 3, 2026
Context window1M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.065$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.26$6.00
Coding index41.167.1
Independent measurements behind it25
Cost per solved task$0.40$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5-Flash better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding: it scores 67.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 41.1 for Qwen3.5-Flash. Pick Qwen3.5-Flash for output tokens 23.1x cheaper ($0.26 vs $6.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.40 against $1.32).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-Flash or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.5-Flash costs $0.065 per million input tokens and $0.26 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Qwen3.5-Flash costs $0.40 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $1.32.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-Flash or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Neither: both take 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

52 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Qwen3.5-Flash's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/qwen3-5-flash-02-23-vs-qwen3-8-max-0902" title="Qwen3.5-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902), LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/qwen3-5-flash-02-23-vs-qwen3-8-max-0902">LLMBenchmark.ai, Qwen3.5-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)</a></p>