Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

o4 Mini vs Inkling Small

Updated October 21, 2026. 59 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

o4 MiniOpenAI
Coding
68.6
Overall
16.7
Output $/M
$4.40
3
T Inkling SmallThinking Machines
Coding
29.9
Overall
25.7
Output $/M
$1.20
56
vs boards won of 59 shared

Decision reading

Pick o4 Mini for coding: it scores 68.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 29.9 for Inkling Small.

Pick Inkling Small when output tokens cost 3.7x less, or when the context window is larger, 524K against 200K tokens.

Shared results
59
o4 Mini only
35
Inkling Small only
25
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
o4 Mini 68.6 from 2 benchmarks, Inkling Small 29.9 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Reasoning, 13.2 points apart on average over 12 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI-2: o4 Mini 6.1% against Inkling Small 40.1%, 34.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
o4 Mini $4.40 against Inkling Small $1.20 per million output tokens, 3.7x apart.
Context window
o4 Mini takes 200K tokens, Inkling Small 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Categoryo4 MiniBarsInkling SmallTies
Coding03
Intelligence02
Reasoning012
Math05
Knowledge29
General125
All shared boards356
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for o4 Mini and Inkling Small
Benchmarko4 MiniInkling SmallLeader
Aider polyglot72.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified64.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
SWE-bench Multimodal33.9%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1409Only Inkling Small measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.9Only Inkling Small measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.2%85.9%Inkling Small
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Inkling Small measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured19.1%Only Inkling Small measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured13.7%Only Inkling Small measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Inkling Small measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured9.3%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Inkling Small measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured33.6%Only Inkling Small measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only Inkling Small measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)85.9%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
SciCodeNot measured49.7%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.2%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
GSO-Bench3.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
WeirdML52.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding13681450Inkling Small
LMArena Text: software and IT13671447Inkling Small
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1399Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1398Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1410Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for o4 Mini and Inkling Small
Benchmarko4 MiniInkling SmallLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.725.7Inkling Small
Epoch Capabilities Index145.5150.3Inkling Small
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for o4 Mini and Inkling Small
Benchmarko4 MiniInkling SmallLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured23.5Only Inkling Small measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured41.3%Only Inkling Small measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Inkling Small measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured25.5%Only Inkling Small measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Inkling Small measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Inkling Small measured
τ²-Bench Telecom55.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
METR time horizons63.9%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index012
Reasoning benchmarks for o4 Mini and Inkling Small
Benchmarko4 MiniInkling SmallLeader
GPQA Diamond74.5%83.6%Inkling Small
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.7%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)78.4%89.5%Inkling Small
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)16.5%33.3%Inkling Small
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)79.6%88.5%Inkling Small
ARC-AGI58.7%84.0%Inkling Small
ARC-AGI-26.1%40.1%Inkling Small
SimpleBench38.7%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Chess puzzles22.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzles5.0%6.0%Inkling Small
VPCT57.5%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13511423Inkling Small
LMArena Text: expert13431441Inkling Small
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13661429Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: diagrams11971251Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: homework12341257Inkling Small
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Math benchmarks for o4 Mini and Inkling Small
Benchmarko4 MiniInkling SmallLeader
AIME83.7%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.2%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)93.4%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
AA Math Index90.7Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)90.7%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME81.7%90.0%Inkling Small
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 336.1%46.3%Inkling Small
FrontierMath, tier 44.9%17.1%Inkling Small
ProofBenchNot measured6.0%Only Inkling Small measured
MATH level 597.8%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math13891459Inkling Small
LMArena Text: mathematical work13791441Inkling Small
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index29
Knowledge benchmarks for o4 Mini and Inkling Small
Benchmarko4 MiniInkling SmallLeader
MMLU Pro80.6%85.6%Inkling Small
LegalBench (Vals AI)79.2%83.0%Inkling Small
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.0%69.6%Inkling Small
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.8%75.5%Inkling Small
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.8%62.3%o4 Mini
MedQA (Vals AI)96.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)33.8%37.9%Inkling Small
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.2%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified19.6%19.1%o4 Mini
GeoBench64.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science13541428Inkling Small
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13611413Inkling Small
LMArena Text: legal and government13501415Inkling Small
LMArena Text: business and finance13251413Inkling Small
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for o4 Mini and Inkling Small
Benchmarko4 MiniInkling SmallLeader
Design Arena: websites985Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: UI components983Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: game dev1004Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: data viz990Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: 3D854Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: all code categories977Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index125
General benchmarks for o4 Mini and Inkling Small
Benchmarko4 MiniInkling SmallLeader
Vals IndexNot measured27.6%Only Inkling Small measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured59.4%Only Inkling Small measured
SAGE (Vals AI)41.1%32.7%o4 Mini
MedScribe (Vals AI)69.1%84.1%Inkling Small
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured50.0%Only Inkling Small measured
IFBench68.7%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)61.0%75.7%Inkling Small
DTBench77.6%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMCA26.5%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Fiction.LiveBench77.8%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)75.0%Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text13531413Inkling Small
LMArena Text: instruction following13201399Inkling Small
LMArena Text: creative writing12941334Inkling Small
LMArena Vision11941237Inkling Small
LMArena Text: English13671421Inkling Small
LMArena Text: non-English13371401Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Chinese13541464Inkling Small
LMArena Text: German13361408Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Japanese13081401Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Korean13121367Inkling Small
LMArena Text: French13641435Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Spanish13461422Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Russian13341394Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Polish13581428Inkling Small
LMArena Text: multi-turn13501416Inkling Small
LMArena Text: longer queries13151402Inkling Small
LMArena Text: writing and language13161357Inkling Small
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13081352Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: English12001243Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: Chinese12181292Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: reading text11971243Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: humor11991207Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: captioning1204Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1218Not measuredOnly o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing11661205Inkling Small
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for o4 Mini and Inkling Small
Benchmarko4 MiniInkling SmallLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

o4 Mini$0.0033Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.0010Fits in one request

Inkling Small costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

o4 Mini$0.068Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.026Fits in one request

Inkling Small costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

o4 Mini$0.264Exceeds the context window
Inkling Small$0.102Fits in one request

Inkling Small costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of o4 Mini and Inkling Small
SpecificationOpenAI o4 MiniThinking Machines Inkling Small
MakerOpenAIThinking Machines
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 16, 2025July 30, 2026
Context window200K524K
Input $/Mtok$1.10$0.45
Output $/Mtok$4.40$1.20
Coding index68.629.9
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.16
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is o4 Mini better than Inkling Small for coding?

Pick o4 Mini for coding: it scores 68.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 29.9 for Inkling Small. Pick Inkling Small when output tokens cost 3.7x less, or when the context window is larger, 524K against 200K tokens.

Which is cheaper, o4 Mini or Inkling Small?

o4 Mini costs $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; Inkling Small costs $0.45 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for Inkling Small only.

Which has the bigger context window, o4 Mini or Inkling Small?

Inkling Small, with 524K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the o4 Mini vs Inkling Small comparison based on?

59 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. o4 Mini's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Inkling Small's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next