Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

o3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads o3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 45.4 to 20.2, and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs 1.3x less per output token ($6.00 vs $8.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 65 benchmarks have a result for both.

o3OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
51.1
Output $/M
$8.00
4
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
62.4
Overall
68.9
Output $/M
$6.00
61
vs boards won of 65 shared

o3 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which to pick

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; o3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick o3 for a lower cost per solved task ($0.571 against $1.32) and work measured by LegalBench (Vals AI) or MortgageTax (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
65
o3 only
37
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
48
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
o3 not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 62.4 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 29.9 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3: o3 33.3% against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 74.7%, 41.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
o3 $8.00 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
o3 takes 200K tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Categoryo3BarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding03
Intelligence02
Reasoning012
Math04
Knowledge47
Web design05
General028
All shared boards461
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Benchmarko3Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Aider polyglot81.3%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
SWE-bench Verified58.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal36.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1674Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured76.2Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)83.9%87.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured85.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured34.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured24.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured12.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)80.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
SciCodeNot measured53.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.1%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GSO-Bench8.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
WeirdML52.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
ALE-Bench933.5Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: coding14071502Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: software and IT14151498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1692Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1649Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SciCode9.2%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Benchmarko3Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence Index20.245.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities Index146.7157.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Benchmarko3Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured56.0Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1300Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1305Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1224Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1202Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1258Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured937Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench researchNot measured69.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured42.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured60.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
τ²-Bench Telecom80.7%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured63.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
METR time horizons65.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
GDPval30.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
DeepResearch Bench45.2%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
OSWorld23.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)63.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
BrowseComp-Plus65.9%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index012
Reasoning benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Benchmarko3Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA Diamond84.1%93.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)80.4%88.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)82.7%92.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)20.1%43.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)81.8%92.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
ARC-AGI60.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
ARC-AGI-26.5%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
SimpleBench53.1%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Chess puzzles37.0%46.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Mystery game puzzles29.0%38.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
VPCT52.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14021496Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: expert14021507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14111503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: diagrams12201323Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: homework12341336Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.6%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Benchmarko3Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AIME85.3%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.6%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
AA Math Index88.3Not measuredOnly o3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)88.3%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
OTIS Mock AIME84.4%100.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 333.3%74.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MATH level 597.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: math14261501Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: mathematical work14231491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index47
Knowledge benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Benchmarko3Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU Pro85.6%88.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.8%83.6%o3
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.7%65.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.6%75.5%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.7%64.0%o3
MedQA (Vals AI)96.1%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.3%40.7%o3
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.3%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
SimpleQA Verified49.4%47.3%o3
GeoBench74.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: science14291512Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14481503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: legal and government14281492Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: business and finance13931480Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FACTS Benchmark Suite44.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Web design benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Benchmarko3Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websites10361275Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: UI components10171340Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: game dev10341313Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: data viz12001282Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1337Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: all code categories10201293Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1200Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index028
General benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Benchmarko3Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)41.8%51.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.7%85.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IFBench71.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)74.7%80.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
DTBench84.8%92.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMCA39.7%46.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Fiction.LiveBench88.9%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)83.9%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
CL-bench17.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text14101483Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: instruction following13681481Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: creative writing13591477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision12141313Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: English14171491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: non-English14011473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Chinese14371539Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: German14201478Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Japanese14031473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Korean13701460Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: French14301498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Spanish13951489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Russian14061482Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Polish14381471Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: multi-turn14051489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: longer queries13721488Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: writing and language13721477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13731464Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: English12211311Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: Chinese12371358Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: reading text12181322Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: humor12221304Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: captioning1210Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1234Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12011312Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Benchmarko3Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

o3$0.0060Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

o3$0.124Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

o3$0.480Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of o3 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationOpenAI o3Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 16, 2025September 3, 2026
Context window200K1M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$2.00
Output $/Mtok$8.00$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked62.4
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved task$0.571$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is o3 better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; o3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick o3 for a lower cost per solved task ($0.571 against $1.32) and work measured by LegalBench (Vals AI) or MortgageTax (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, o3 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

o3 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $8.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, o3 costs $0.571 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $1.32.

Which has the bigger context window, o3 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902), with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the o3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

65 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. o3's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next