Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads Mistral Medium 3.5 on coding, 59.0 to 25.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs 12.5x less per output token ($0.60 vs $7.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 10 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax
Coding
59.0
Overall
60.6
Output $/M
$0.60
10
Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI
Coding
25.5
Overall
37.3
Output $/M
$7.50
0
vs boards won of 10 shared

MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Mistral Medium 3.5: which to pick

Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for coding: it scores 59.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 25.5 for Mistral Medium 3.5.

Mistral Medium 3.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
10
MiniMax M3.1 Flash only
10
Mistral Medium 3.5 only
72
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M3.1 Flash 59.0 from 4 benchmarks, Mistral Medium 3.5 25.5 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 45.0 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): MiniMax M3.1 Flash 73.9% against Mistral Medium 3.5 2.9%, 71.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M3.1 Flash $0.60 against Mistral Medium 3.5 $7.50 per million output tokens, 12.5x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M3.1 Flash takes 1M tokens, Mistral Medium 3.5 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M3.1 FlashBarsMistral Medium 3.5Ties
Coding50
Intelligence10
Agentic work20
Reasoning10
General10
All shared boards100
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMistral Medium 3.5Leader
LiveBench coding83.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev15871264MiniMax M3.1 Flash
AA Coding IndexNot measured46.9Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured66.4%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)25.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)73.9%2.9%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured5.1%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
SciCode53.4%40.2%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured764.0Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1460Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1458Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16091254MiniMax M3.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTML15291308MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMistral Medium 3.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index42.714.2MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured141.4Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMistral Medium 3.5Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured7.0Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LiveBench research72.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LiveBench browser92.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LiveBench long agentic34.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured32.1%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)32.1%4.5%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)34.1%9.1%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)7.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured11.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured94.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMistral Medium 3.5Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured34.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LiveBench reasoning82.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured74.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)48.0%13.8%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1436Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1432Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1445Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1254Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1230Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured41.4%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMistral Medium 3.5Leader
ProofBenchNot measured9.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1431Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1440Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMistral Medium 3.5Leader
MMLU ProNot measured75.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured44.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured58.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured68.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured28.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured33.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1428Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1409Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1437Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1426Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMistral Medium 3.5Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1142Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1076Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1079Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1121Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1060Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1121Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured949Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1062Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LiveBench design74.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMistral Medium 3.5Leader
Vals Index53.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LiveBench data analysis71.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured37.6%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured67.7%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured34.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured68.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.7%69.3%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
DTBenchNot measured75.5%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMCANot measured26.1%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured26.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1421Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1415Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1374Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1222Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1433Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1404Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1444Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1453Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1384Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1448Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1411Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1395Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1430Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1423Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1415Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1384Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1382Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1240Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1244Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1233Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1216Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1198Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
EQ-Bench 4Not measured993Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMistral Medium 3.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0004Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.0053Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0093Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.098Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.036Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.375Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5
SpecificationMiniMax M3.1 FlashMistral Medium 3.5
MakerMiniMaxMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 19, 2026April 30, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.50
Output $/Mtok$0.60$7.50
Coding index59.025.5
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved taskNot computable$6.02
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M3.1 Flash better than Mistral Medium 3.5 for coding?

Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for coding: it scores 59.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 25.5 for Mistral Medium 3.5. Mistral Medium 3.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Mistral Medium 3.5?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 and $7.50. Cost per solved task is known for Mistral Medium 3.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Mistral Medium 3.5?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5 comparison based on?

10 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. MiniMax M3.1 Flash's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash-vs-mistral-medium-3-5" title="MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash-vs-mistral-medium-3-5">LLMBenchmark.ai, MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5</a></p>