Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 leads Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview on coding, 25.5 to 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs 5.0x less per output token ($1.50 vs $7.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 68 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle
Coding
22.7
Overall
36.6
Output $/M
$1.50
29
Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI
Coding
25.5
Overall
37.3
Output $/M
$7.50
39
vs boards won of 68 shared

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Mistral Medium 3.5: which to pick

Pick Mistral Medium 3.5 for coding: it scores 25.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.7 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview.

Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($1.50 vs $7.50 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.18 against $6.02).

Shared results
68
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only
11
Mistral Medium 3.5 only
13
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 22.7 from 3 benchmarks, Mistral Medium 3.5 25.5 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 12.1 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 81.1% against Mistral Medium 3.5 34.9%, 46.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $1.50 against Mistral Medium 3.5 $7.50 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Medium 3.5 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewBarsMistral Medium 3.5Ties
Coding110
Intelligence10
Agentic work05
Reasoning24
Math02
Knowledge73
Web design26
General169
All shared boards2939
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index110
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMistral Medium 3.5Leader
LMArena WebDev12571264Mistral Medium 3.5
AA Coding Index34.746.9Mistral Medium 3.5
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)62.8%66.4%Mistral Medium 3.5
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)0.0%2.9%Mistral Medium 3.5
Code migration (Vals AI)4.6%5.1%Mistral Medium 3.5
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)34.1%39.0%Mistral Medium 3.5
SciCodeNot measured40.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
ALE-Bench797.7764.0Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: coding14001460Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14131458Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena WebDev: React12451254Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena WebDev: HTML12761308Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena WebDev: from an image1336Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
SciCode4.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMistral Medium 3.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index15.614.2Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured141.4Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMistral Medium 3.5Leader
AA Agentic Index1.67.0Mistral Medium 3.5
Finance Agent (Vals AI)30.0%32.1%Mistral Medium 3.5
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)3.1%4.5%Mistral Medium 3.5
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)3.4%9.1%Mistral Medium 3.5
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)8.6%11.2%Mistral Medium 3.5
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured94.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMistral Medium 3.5Leader
GPQA Diamond81.1%34.9%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)82.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured74.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured13.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14071436Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: expert13981432Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14031445Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision: diagrams12421254Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision: homework12711230Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured41.4%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMistral Medium 3.5Leader
AIME83.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
ProofBenchNot measured9.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: math14281431Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work14171440Mistral Medium 3.5
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index73
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMistral Medium 3.5Leader
MMLU Pro86.2%75.3%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.0%44.2%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.4%58.8%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.8%68.0%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.0%28.9%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MedCode (Vals AI)47.6%33.8%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: science14251428Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14281409Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: legal and government14181437Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: business and finance13891426Mistral Medium 3.5
FACTS Benchmark Suite51.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index26
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMistral Medium 3.5Leader
Design Arena: websites10821142Mistral Medium 3.5
Design Arena: UI components10691076Mistral Medium 3.5
Design Arena: game dev10291079Mistral Medium 3.5
Design Arena: data viz10451120Mistral Medium 3.5
Design Arena: 3D10471060Mistral Medium 3.5
Design Arena: all code categories10721121Mistral Medium 3.5
Design Arena: SVG1052949Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Design Arena: ASCII art11671062Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index169
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMistral Medium 3.5Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)49.5%37.6%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MedScribe (Vals AI)63.9%67.7%Mistral Medium 3.5
Vals Multimodal Index41.4%34.8%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
IFBenchNot measured68.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured69.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
DTBenchNot measured75.5%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMCANot measured26.1%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured26.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text14161421Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: instruction following13771415Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: creative writing14011374Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Vision12401222Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: English14141433Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: non-English14101404Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese14601444Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: German14301453Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: Japanese1413Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Korean13921384Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: French14241448Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: Spanish14211411Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Russian14201395Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Polish14431430Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: multi-turn14171423Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: longer queries13941415Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: writing and language14081384Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13861382Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Vision: English12321240Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision: Chinese12781244Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Vision: reading text12461233Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Vision: humor12661216Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Vision: captioning1259Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1308Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12481198Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMistral Medium 3.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.0010Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.0053Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.017Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.098Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.065Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.375Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Mistral Medium 3.5
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewMistral Medium 3.5
MakerGoogleMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 3, 2026April 30, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$1.50
Output $/Mtok$1.50$7.50
Coding index22.725.5
Independent measurements behind it33
Cost per solved task$0.18$6.02
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview better than Mistral Medium 3.5 for coding?

Pick Mistral Medium 3.5 for coding: it scores 25.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.7 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview. Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($1.50 vs $7.50 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.18 against $6.02).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 and $7.50. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.18 and Mistral Medium 3.5 $6.02.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Mistral Medium 3.5 comparison based on?

68 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview-vs-mistral-medium-3-5" title="Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Mistral Medium 3.5, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview-vs-mistral-medium-3-5">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Mistral Medium 3.5</a></p>