Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads MiniMax M1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 45.4 to 11.7, and MiniMax M1 costs 2.7x less per output token ($2.20 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.20
0
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
67.1
Overall
70.1
Output $/M
$6.00
29
vs boards won of 29 shared

MiniMax M1 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which to pick

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 67.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M1 for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($2.20 vs $6.00 per million).

Shared results
29
MiniMax M1 only
0
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
87
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M1 not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 67.1 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 33.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Japanese: MiniMax M1 1218 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1473, 42.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M1 $2.20 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 2.7x apart.
Context window
Both take 1M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M1BarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General017
All shared boards029
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1673Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured76.2Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured85.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured38.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured77.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured24.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured24.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SciCodeNot measured53.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: coding13591503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: software and IT13591498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1690Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1652Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence Index11.745.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.4Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured56.0Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1300Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1305Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1224Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1194Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1226Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured995Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench researchNot measured69.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured42.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured49.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured72.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured63.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured93.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured92.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured43.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured92.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured46.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured38.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13391497Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: expert13171507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13531504Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured100.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: math13611501Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: mathematical work13631491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MathArenaNot measured51.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured47.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: science13541512Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13551503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: legal and government13371494Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: business and finance13191481Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1276Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1282Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1338Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1293Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1200Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Vals IndexNot measured59.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured51.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured80.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
DTBenchNot measured92.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMCANot measured46.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text13431484Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: instruction following13121481Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: creative writing12971477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena VisionNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: English13631492Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: non-English13191473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Chinese13601539Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: German13501476Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Japanese12181473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Korean12661462Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: French13701502Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Spanish13531487Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Russian13291482Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Polish13291471Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: multi-turn13351490Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: longer queries13261489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: writing and language13111477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13031464Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1311Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1358Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1304Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.0015Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

MiniMax M1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.027Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

MiniMax M1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.102Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

MiniMax M1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationMiniMax M1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerMiniMaxQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJune 17, 2025September 3, 2026
Context window1M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.40$2.00
Output $/Mtok$2.20$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked67.1
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M1 better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 67.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M1 for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($2.20 vs $6.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M1 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

MiniMax M1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M1 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Neither: both take 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. MiniMax M1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next