LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark Open vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Updated October 21, 2026. 16 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
62.1
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.25
15
Qwen3.6 PlusQwen
Coding
37.4
Overall
27.0
Output $/M
$1.95
0
vs boards won of 16 shared, 1 tied

Decision reading

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 62.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.4 for Qwen3.6 Plus.

Pick Qwen3.6 Plus when output tokens cost 2.2x less.

Shared results
16
Muse Spark Open only
10
Qwen3.6 Plus only
67
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark Open 62.1 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3.6 Plus 37.4 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Agentic work, 20.9 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Muse Spark Open 76.2% against Qwen3.6 Plus 25.6%, 50.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Spark Open $4.25 against Qwen3.6 Plus $1.95 per million output tokens, 2.2x apart.
Context window
Muse Spark Open takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.6 Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Spark OpenBarsQwen3.6 PlusTies
Coding60
Intelligence10
Agentic work40
Reasoning20
Web design20
General001 tie
All shared boards1501 tie
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index60
Coding benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3.6 PlusLeader
LiveBench coding73.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev15281461Muse Spark Open
AA Coding IndexNot measured54.5Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.0%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured73.4%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)6.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)76.2%25.6%Muse Spark Open
Code migration (Vals AI)21.2%11.1%Muse Spark Open
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured53.2%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
SciCode58.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured43.9%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
ALE-Bench1590.1670.1Muse Spark Open
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1467Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1462Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena WebDev: React15291454Muse Spark Open
LMArena WebDev: HTML14951463Muse Spark Open
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1472Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3.6 PlusLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured27.0Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Epoch Capabilities Index155.1147.3Muse Spark Open
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3.6 PlusLeader
LiveBench research80.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browser36.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agentic18.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)61.3%40.9%Muse Spark Open
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.3%7.7%Muse Spark Open
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%14.9%Muse Spark Open
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)53.7%32.9%Muse Spark Open
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured97.7%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
APEX-Agents33.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$5,115Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3.6 PlusLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured87.4%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LiveBench reasoning73.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured84.2%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.0%88.2%Muse Spark Open
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.9%27.8%Muse Spark Open
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured88.4%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured14.0%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured12.0%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1448Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1454Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1455Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3.6 PlusLeader
AIMENot measured94.6%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured93.3%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured38.2%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1449Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1448Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3.6 PlusLeader
MMLU ProNot measured87.7%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.2%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured51.5%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured61.9%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.7%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.0%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured36.9%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured44.1%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1439Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1442Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1437Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1430Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Web design benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3.6 PlusLeader
Design Arena: websites13111243Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1233Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Design Arena: game dev12901211Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1228Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1202Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1236Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1160Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1115Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LiveBench design60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index00
General benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3.6 PlusLeader
LiveBench data analysis60.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured44.9%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured77.0%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured51.5%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
IFBenchNot measured75.2%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.3%78.3%Tie
DTBenchNot measured81.9%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMCANot measured33.1%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
CL-benchNot measured20.3%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena TextNot measured1436Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1424Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1404Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1445Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1424Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1477Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1451Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1390Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1379Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1455Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1432Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1434Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1433Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1438Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1439Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1418Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1402Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3.6 PlusLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 Plus$0.0013Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 Plus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 Plus$0.022Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 Plus costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 Plus$0.085Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 Plus costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark Open and Qwen3.6 Plus
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark OpenQwen3.6 Plus
MakerMetaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 15, 2026April 2, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.325
Output $/Mtok$4.25$1.95
Coding index62.137.4
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.19
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark Open better than Qwen3.6 Plus for coding?

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 62.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.4 for Qwen3.6 Plus. Pick Qwen3.6 Plus when output tokens cost 2.2x less.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark Open or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Plus costs $0.325 and $1.95. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.6 Plus only.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark Open or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Spark Open vs Qwen3.6 Plus comparison based on?

16 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Muse Spark Open's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.6 Plus's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next