Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiniMax M2.1

Muse Spark 1.3 leads MiniMax M2.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 48.1 to 20.9, and MiniMax M2.1 costs 3.5x less per output token ($1.20 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
57.4
Overall
68.6
Output $/M
$4.25
12
MiniMax M2.1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
0
vs boards won of 12 shared

Muse Spark 1.3 or MiniMax M2.1: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M2.1 for output tokens 3.5x cheaper ($1.20 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
12
Muse Spark 1.3 only
84
MiniMax M2.1 only
22
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark 1.3 57.4 from 4 benchmarks, MiniMax M2.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 35.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: Muse Spark 1.3 1688.3 against MiniMax M2.1 623.8, 35.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 against MiniMax M2.1 $1.20 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
Context window
Muse Spark 1.3 takes 1.05M tokens, MiniMax M2.1 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Spark 1.3BarsMiniMax M2.1Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
Web design70
General10
All shared boards120
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.1Leader
LiveBench coding90.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev1657Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
AA Coding Index75.8Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured81.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured74.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)10.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)27.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)43.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)72.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured81.0%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
SciCode59.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured36.6%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
FrontierSWE25.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ALE-Bench1688.3623.8Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: coding1511Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1511Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1671Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1653Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1640Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index48.120.9Muse Spark 1.3
Epoch Capabilities Index157.2Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.1Leader
AA Agentic Index55.5Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1297Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1295Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1218Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1241Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1210Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1075Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench research68.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench long agentic40.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)58.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)36.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)62.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured85.4%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
APEX-Agents58.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.1Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured78.5%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
LiveBench reasoning89.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.1%83.0%Muse Spark 1.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)48.7%23.2%Muse Spark 1.3
Chess puzzles37.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Mystery game puzzles25.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1504Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: expert1515Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1501Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1330Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1296Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)25.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.1Leader
AIMENot measured77.9%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured89.0%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured82.7Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.7%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIME99.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 374.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProofBench58.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: math1502Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1493Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
MathArena43.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.0%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.5%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured55.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured58.9%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured66.3%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured91.2%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured34.1%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured87.5%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
LMArena Text: science1506Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1493Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1499Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1489Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
PRBench Finance59.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
PRBench Legal61.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.1Leader
Design Arena: websites13561201Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: UI components13501220Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: game dev13281134Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: data viz13431207Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: 3D13641166Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: all code categories13511190Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: SVG13011131Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: ASCII art1279Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench design74.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.1Leader
LiveBench data analysis79.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured80.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
IFBenchNot measured69.9%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.0%67.7%Muse Spark 1.3
DTBench96.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMCA53.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text1491Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1479Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1462Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision1308Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: English1496Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1482Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1529Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: German1513Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1465Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1494Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: French1516Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1493Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1494Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1487Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1489Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1489Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1470Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1458Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: English1298Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1384Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1319Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1293Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1296Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.1$0.0009Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.1$0.019Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.1$0.072Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax M2.1
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark 1.3MiniMax M2.1
MakerMetaMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 2, 2026December 23, 2025
Context window1.05M205K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.30
Output $/Mtok$4.25$1.20
Coding index57.4Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it41
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.59
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than MiniMax M2.1 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M2.1 for output tokens 3.5x cheaper ($1.20 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 or MiniMax M2.1?

Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2.1 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark 1.3 or MiniMax M2.1?

Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiniMax M2.1 comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Muse Spark 1.3's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2.1's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next