Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Inkling

Inkling leads Muse Glimmer 30B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.0 to 17.5, and Muse Glimmer 30B costs 3.0x less per output token ($1.35 vs $4.05 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse Glimmer 30BMeta
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.35
1
T InklingThinking Machines
Coding
31.5
Overall
46.5
Output $/M
$4.05
4
vs boards won of 5 shared

Muse Glimmer 30B or Inkling: which to pick

Only Inkling has a coding score, 31.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Muse Glimmer 30B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Muse Glimmer 30B for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($1.35 vs $4.05 per million) and work measured by ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Shared results
5
Muse Glimmer 30B only
0
Inkling only
97
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Glimmer 30B not benchmarked, Inkling 31.5 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 14.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Agentic Index: Muse Glimmer 30B 8.5 against Inkling 22.5, 14.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Glimmer 30B $1.35 against Inkling $4.05 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
Context window
Muse Glimmer 30B takes 131K tokens, Inkling 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Glimmer 30BBarsInklingTies
Coding11
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Web design01
All shared boards14
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11
Coding benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Inkling
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BInklingLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured64.0%Only Inkling measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1414Only Inkling measured
AA Coding Index49.052.1Inkling
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.5%Only Inkling measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured77.6%Only Inkling measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Inkling measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured19.2%Only Inkling measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured11.8%Only Inkling measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Inkling measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured14.9%Only Inkling measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Inkling measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured7.3%Only Inkling measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured26.1%Only Inkling measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured66.8%Only Inkling measured
SciCodeNot measured47.0%Only Inkling measured
FrontierCodeNot measured14.0%Only Inkling measured
FrontierSWENot measured4.1%Only Inkling measured
WeirdMLNot measured32.3%Only Inkling measured
ALE-Bench962.5946.0Muse Glimmer 30B
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1466Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1465Only Inkling measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1404Only Inkling measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1399Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Inkling
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BInklingLeader
AA Intelligence Index17.525.0Inkling
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured148.4Only Inkling measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Inkling
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BInklingLeader
AA Agentic Index8.522.5Inkling
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1196Only Inkling measured
LiveBench researchNot measured59.9%Only Inkling measured
LiveBench browserNot measured16.0%Only Inkling measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured14.1%Only Inkling measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Inkling measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured46.6%Only Inkling measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.3%Only Inkling measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured28.4%Only Inkling measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured3.8%Only Inkling measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured38.4%Only Inkling measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.8%Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Inkling
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BInklingLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured87.1%Only Inkling measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured78.3%Only Inkling measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured78.5%Only Inkling measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured87.2%Only Inkling measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured31.9%Only Inkling measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured88.3%Only Inkling measured
ARC-AGINot measured79.5%Only Inkling measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured36.5%Only Inkling measured
SimpleBenchNot measured50.0%Only Inkling measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured21.0%Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1451Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1466Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1448Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Inkling
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BInklingLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured88.9%Only Inkling measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured33.3%Only Inkling measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured4.9%Only Inkling measured
ProofBenchNot measured0.0%Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1479Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1460Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Inkling
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BInklingLeader
MMLU ProNot measured86.3%Only Inkling measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.0%Only Inkling measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured68.6%Only Inkling measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.3%Only Inkling measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Inkling measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.2%Only Inkling measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured40.3%Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1455Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1447Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1448Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1438Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Web design benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Inkling
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BInklingLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1224Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1198Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: game dev11441165Inkling
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1156Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1160Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1205Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1108Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1089Only Inkling measured
LiveBench designNot measured58.3%Only Inkling measured
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index26 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Inkling
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BInklingLeader
Vals IndexNot measured29.0%Only Inkling measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured72.8%Only Inkling measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.5%Only Inkling measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured36.5%Only Inkling measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only Inkling measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured49.4%Only Inkling measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured77.3%Only Inkling measured
DTBenchNot measured87.5%Only Inkling measured
LMCANot measured37.6%Only Inkling measured
LMArena TextNot measured1442Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1425Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1390Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1442Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1434Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1493Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1445Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1429Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1403Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1455Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1449Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1430Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1450Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1437Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1435Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1404Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1394Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Inkling
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BInklingLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.0010Fits in one request
Inkling$0.0030Fits in one request

Muse Glimmer 30B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.020Fits in one request
Inkling$0.061Fits in one request

Muse Glimmer 30B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.079Exceeds the context window
Inkling$0.235Fits in one request

Muse Glimmer 30B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Glimmer 30B and Inkling
SpecificationMeta Muse Glimmer 30BThinking Machines Inkling
MakerMetaThinking Machines
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 9, 2026July 17, 2026
Context window131K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.325$0.975
Output $/Mtok$1.35$4.05
Coding indexNot benchmarked31.5
Independent measurements behind it06
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.76
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Glimmer 30B better than Inkling for coding?

Only Inkling has a coding score, 31.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Muse Glimmer 30B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Muse Glimmer 30B for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($1.35 vs $4.05 per million) and work measured by ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Inkling?

Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.325 per million input tokens and $1.35 per million output tokens; Inkling costs $0.975 and $4.05. Cost per solved task is known for Inkling only.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Glimmer 30B or Inkling?

Inkling, with 524K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Glimmer 30B vs Inkling comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Glimmer 30B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Inkling's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next