Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Ember vs MiniMax M3

Muse Ember leads MiniMax M3 on coding, 64.9 to 33.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Muse Ember costs 2.4x less per output token ($0.50 vs $1.20 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 13 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse EmberMeta
Coding
64.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.50
13
MiniMax M3MiniMax
Coding
33.6
Overall
47.1
Output $/M
$1.20
0
vs boards won of 13 shared

Muse Ember or MiniMax M3: which to pick

Pick Muse Ember for coding: it scores 64.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.6 for MiniMax M3, though on 3 benchmarks against 5.

MiniMax M3 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
13
Muse Ember only
2
MiniMax M3 only
105
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Ember 64.9 from 3 benchmarks, MiniMax M3 33.6 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 27.6 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): Muse Ember 39.4% against MiniMax M3 1.0%, 51.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Ember $0.50 against MiniMax M3 $1.20 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse EmberBarsMiniMax M3Ties
Coding70
Agentic work30
Reasoning20
Knowledge10
All shared boards130
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index70
Coding benchmarks for Muse Ember and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkMuse EmberMiniMax M3Leader
LMArena WebDev16091484Muse Ember
AA Coding IndexNot measured58.6Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured75.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)39.4%1.0%Muse Ember
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.7%47.6%Muse Ember
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured19.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured53.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured33.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured9.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured51.5%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SciCodeNot measured47.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured42.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)40.9%2.0%Muse Ember
FrontierCode 2.027.2%21.9%Muse Ember
FrontierCodeNot measured14.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured640.0Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1468Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1463Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16161479Muse Ember
LMArena WebDev: HTML16211460Muse Ember
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1473Only MiniMax M3 measured
GameBench 2Not measured29.0Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0Not measured7.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Ember and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkMuse EmberMiniMax M3Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured18.9Only MiniMax M3 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured147.7Only MiniMax M3 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Ember and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkMuse EmberMiniMax M3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured29.5Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1186Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1175Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1169Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1156Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1110Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1076Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1171Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1159Only MiniMax M3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured48.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)38.2%20.6%Muse Ember
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)49.0%29.8%Muse Ember
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)25.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Ember measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured47.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured88.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
APEX-Agents64.3%37.7%Muse Ember
OSWorld 2.0Not measured4.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$2,158Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Ember and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkMuse EmberMiniMax M3Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured92.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured81.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured92.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured39.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)25.1%16.0%Muse Ember
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)39.0%28.0%Muse Ember
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured90.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured45.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1442Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1460Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1452Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1266Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1266Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Ember and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkMuse EmberMiniMax M3Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured71.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
ProofBenchNot measured18.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1423Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1443Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Ember and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkMuse EmberMiniMax M3Leader
MMLU ProNot measured84.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured68.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured72.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured46.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
AA-Omniscience7.7-5.5Muse Ember
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1446Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1433Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1430Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1431Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Ember and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkMuse EmberMiniMax M3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1249Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1235Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1200Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1229Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1189Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1236Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1146Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1149Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index37 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Muse Ember and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkMuse EmberMiniMax M3Leader
Vals Index60.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Ember measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured85.5%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured87.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured60.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
IFBenchNot measured82.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured83.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
GDPval-AANot measured1250Only MiniMax M3 measured
DTBenchNot measured78.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMCANot measured33.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured55.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1428Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1428Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1395Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1249Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1440Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1414Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1465Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1429Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1363Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1365Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1439Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1424Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1422Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1417Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1439Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1440Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1411Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1398Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1260Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1310Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1256Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1235Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1196Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1232Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1437Only MiniMax M3 measured
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1140Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Ember and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkMuse EmberMiniMax M3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Ember$0.0003Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.0009Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Ember$0.0065Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.019Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Ember$0.025Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.072Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Ember and MiniMax M3
SpecificationMeta Muse EmberMiniMax M3
MakerMetaMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 9, 2026May 31, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.50$1.20
Coding index64.933.6
Independent measurements behind it35
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.56
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Ember better than MiniMax M3 for coding?

Pick Muse Ember for coding: it scores 64.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.6 for MiniMax M3, though on 3 benchmarks against 5. MiniMax M3 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, Muse Ember or MiniMax M3?

Muse Ember costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Ember or MiniMax M3?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Ember vs MiniMax M3 comparison based on?

13 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Muse Ember's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M3's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/meta-muse-ember-vs-minimax-minimax-m3" title="Muse Ember vs MiniMax M3, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/meta-muse-ember-vs-minimax-minimax-m3">LLMBenchmark.ai, Muse Ember vs MiniMax M3</a></p>