LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 4 Maverick vs Muse Spark 1.3

Updated October 21, 2026. 53 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Llama 4 MaverickMeta Llama
Coding
18.1
Overall
9.3
Output $/M
$0.6525
0
Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
79.7
Overall
48.1
Output $/M
$4.25
53
vs boards won of 53 shared

Decision reading

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 79.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 18.1 for Llama 4 Maverick.

Pick Llama 4 Maverick when output tokens cost 6.5x less.

Shared results
53
Llama 4 Maverick only
31
Muse Spark 1.3 only
39
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 4 Maverick 18.1 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.3 79.7 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 58.8 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: Llama 4 Maverick 838 against Muse Spark 1.3 1329, 61.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 4 Maverick $0.6525 against Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 per million output tokens, 6.5x apart.
Context window
Llama 4 Maverick takes 524K tokens, Muse Spark 1.3 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 4 MaverickBarsMuse Spark 1.3Ties
Coding05
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning07
Math02
Knowledge04
Web design06
General026
All shared boards053
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Aider polyglot15.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
SWE-bench Verified21.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveBench codingNot measured90.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1659Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
AA Coding Index16.375.8Muse Spark 1.3
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured10.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured82.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured27.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured43.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured72.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)39.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
SciCode31.7%59.7%Muse Spark 1.3
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
FrontierSWENot measured25.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
WeirdML24.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
ALE-Bench173.01688.3Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: coding13011510Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: software and IT12991511Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1672Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1653Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1640Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Intelligence Index9.348.1Muse Spark 1.3
Epoch Capabilities Index132.2157.2Muse Spark 1.3
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Agentic Index0.655.5Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1297Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1295Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1217Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1241Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1244Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1048Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured68.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured80.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured40.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured58.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured62.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom17.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured58.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMuse Spark 1.3Leader
GPQA Diamond69.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured89.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)71.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)67.1%94.1%Muse Spark 1.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.9%48.7%Muse Spark 1.3
ARC-AGI4.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
SimpleBench27.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured25.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12811503Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: expert12591519Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12951500Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: diagrams11341330Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: homework11641296Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AIME25.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)85.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
AA Math Index19.3Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)19.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured99.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: math12991497Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: mathematical work12951491Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMuse Spark 1.3Leader
MMLU Pro79.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)49.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)58.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedQA (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedCode (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
GeoBench52.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: science12881507Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12751493Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: legal and government12861499Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: business and finance12601490Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Design Arena: websites8711356Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: UI components8991352Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: game dev8381329Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: data viz8821343Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: 3D9011359Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: all code categories8801353Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1300Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1280Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench designNot measured74.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index026
General benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)35.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)54.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
IFBench43.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)50.0%83.0%Muse Spark 1.3
DTBench61.9%96.5%Muse Spark 1.3
LMCA15.9%53.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Fiction.LiveBench46.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)62.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text12871490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: instruction following12671479Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: creative writing12661462Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision11421308Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: English13031495Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: non-English12691481Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Chinese12771532Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: German12911513Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Japanese12061470Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Korean12031490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: French12591511Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Spanish12931496Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Russian12861491Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Polish12751490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: multi-turn12891487Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: longer queries12801488Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: writing and language12771470Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12501457Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: English11501298Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: Chinese11411384Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: reading text11431319Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: humor11001293Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: creative writing10991296Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 4 Maverick and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.0005Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.011Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick$0.044Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 4 Maverick and Muse Spark 1.3
SpecificationMeta Llama 4 MaverickMeta Muse Spark 1.3
MakerMeta LlamaMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 5, 2025September 2, 2026
Context window524K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.1875$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.6525$4.25
Coding index18.179.7
Independent measurements behind it22
Cost per solved task$1.491Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 4 Maverick better than Muse Spark 1.3 for coding?

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 79.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 18.1 for Llama 4 Maverick. Pick Llama 4 Maverick when output tokens cost 6.5x less.

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Muse Spark 1.3?

Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.1875 per million input tokens and $0.6525 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Maverick only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 4 Maverick or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 4 Maverick vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison based on?

53 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Llama 4 Maverick's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.3's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/llama-4-maverick-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-3" title="Llama 4 Maverick vs Muse Spark 1.3, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/llama-4-maverick-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-3">LLMBenchmark.ai, Llama 4 Maverick vs Muse Spark 1.3</a></p>