Kimi K3 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs 13.6x less per output token than Kimi K3 ($1.10 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 28 benchmarks have a result for both.
Kimi K3 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B: which to pick
Only Kimi K3 has a coding score, 62.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Beam 1.0 501B A23B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B for output tokens 13.6x cheaper ($1.10 vs $15.00 per million).
- Shared results
- 28
- Kimi K3 only
- 89
- Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
- 0
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Kimi K3 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Kimi K3 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 43.6.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Kimi K3 has a AA Agentic Index result, 50.0.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Kimi K3 has a GPQA Diamond result, 92.9%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Kimi K3 has a MMLU Pro result, 88.0%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Kimi K3
Kimi K3 leads, 1335 against 1253.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Kimi K3 has a Vals Index result, 53.0%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 1.05M tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Kimi K3 $0.011, Beam 1.0 501B A23B $0.0009 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Kimi K3 has the number, $0.81.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Kimi K3 62.3 from 6 benchmarks, Beam 1.0 501B A23B not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Coding, 19.4 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LMArena WebDev: Kimi K3 1655 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1437, 31.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Kimi K3 $15.00 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.10 per million output tokens, 13.6x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 1.05M tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Kimi K3 | Bars | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 5 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 3 | 0 | ||
| Math | 2 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 2 | 0 | ||
| General | 12 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 28 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
| Benchmark | Kimi K3 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 59.3% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1655 | 1437 | Kimi K3 |
| AA Coding Index | 76.2 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 87.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 93.4% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 17.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 85.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 16.1% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 2.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 48.9% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 80.9% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 44.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 18.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 75.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| SciCode | 59.5% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| FrontierCode | 44.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| FrontierSWE | 25.9% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| WeirdML | 82.6% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1524.5 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1508 | 1473 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1499 | 1461 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1670 | 1443 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1644 | 1436 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1579 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Kimi K3 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 43.6 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 157.9 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Kimi K3 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 50.0 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1295 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1315 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1269 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1250 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1223 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1252 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1256 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1273 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1058 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveBench research | 79.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveBench browser | 16.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 42.8% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 53.1% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 33.4% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 46.1% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 12.9% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 66.7% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 72.6% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 1.4% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | 10.5% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 47.8% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| PostTrainBench | 32.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $5,165 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | Kimi K3 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.9% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 90.7% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 88.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 93.5% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 46.9% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 93.1% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| ARC-AGI | 94.5% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 60.4% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| SimpleBench | 60.7% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 37.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 26.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1495 | 1442 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1520 | 1447 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1496 | 1451 | Kimi K3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Kimi K3 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 97.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 72.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 39.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| ProofBench | 87.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1494 | 1459 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1505 | 1475 | Kimi K3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Kimi K3 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 88.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 86.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 71.6% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 75.7% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 66.3% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 49.4% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 50.6% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1508 | 1430 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1489 | 1376 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1503 | 1433 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1470 | 1430 | Kimi K3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Kimi K3 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1335 | 1253 | Kimi K3 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1344 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1359 | 1233 | Kimi K3 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1351 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1388 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1360 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1302 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveBench design | 77.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index120
| Benchmark | Kimi K3 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 53.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | 78.7% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 68.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 52.8% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 88.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 73.4% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 88.7% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| DTBench | 91.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMCA | 52.7% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 95.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Furniture assembly | 34.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1476 | 1425 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1485 | 1430 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1457 | 1390 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1481 | 1436 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1466 | 1413 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1529 | 1424 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1490 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1494 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1460 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1492 | 1461 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1472 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1485 | 1412 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1458 | Not measured | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1489 | 1414 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1494 | 1429 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1471 | 1400 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1453 | 1399 | Kimi K3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Kimi K3 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | MoonshotAI Kimi K3 | Reflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Moonshot AI | Reflection |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | July 16, 2026 | October 16, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $3.00 | $0.35 |
| Output $/Mtok | $15.00 | $1.10 |
| Coding index | 62.3 | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 6 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.81 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Kimi K3 better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?
Only Kimi K3 has a coding score, 62.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Beam 1.0 501B A23B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B for output tokens 13.6x cheaper ($1.10 vs $15.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Kimi K3 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.35 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K3 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K3 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks is the Kimi K3 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?
28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Kimi K3's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.