LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K3 vs Muse Wonder

Updated October 21, 2026. 57 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Kimi K3Moonshot AI
Coding
61.8
Overall
43.6
Output $/M
$11.936
11
Muse WonderMeta
Coding
64.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
46
vs boards won of 57 shared

Decision reading

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 64.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 61.8 for Kimi K3, though on 1 benchmark against 2.

Pick Kimi K3 when output tokens cost 1.7x less, or when what matters is LMArena WebDev or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
57
Kimi K3 only
60
Muse Wonder only
3
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K3 61.8 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Wonder 64.5 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Agentic work, 10.9 points apart on average over 9 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Code migration (Vals AI): Kimi K3 16.1% against Muse Wonder 62.5%, 46.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K3 $11.936 against Muse Wonder $20.00 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K3BarsMuse WonderTies
Coding310
Intelligence01
Agentic work18
Reasoning13
Math21
Knowledge13
Web design15
General215
All shared boards1146
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index310
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse WonderLeader
LiveBench coding59.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LMArena WebDev16551652Kimi K3
AA Coding Index76.2Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)93.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)17.2%49.5%Muse Wonder
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)85.0%83.1%Kimi K3
Code migration (Vals AI)16.1%62.5%Muse Wonder
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)48.9%66.9%Muse Wonder
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)80.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)44.2%45.6%Muse Wonder
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)18.2%26.6%Muse Wonder
CyberBench (Vals AI)75.2%80.4%Muse Wonder
SciCode59.5%60.3%Muse Wonder
FrontierCode44.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
FrontierSWE25.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
WeirdML82.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
ALE-Bench1524.5Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LMArena Text: coding15081522Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: software and IT14991515Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: React16701641Kimi K3
LMArena WebDev: HTML16441694Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: from an image1579Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse WonderLeader
AA Intelligence Index43.6Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index157.9161.8Muse Wonder
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse WonderLeader
AA Agentic Index50.0Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1296Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1315Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1267Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1256Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1223Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1252Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1256Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1273Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets10581236Muse Wonder
LiveBench research79.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LiveBench browser16.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LiveBench long agentic42.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.1%56.6%Muse Wonder
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)33.4%36.3%Muse Wonder
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)46.1%50.5%Muse Wonder
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)12.9%23.8%Muse Wonder
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)66.7%67.1%Muse Wonder
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)72.6%67.0%Kimi K3
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)1.4%22.9%Muse Wonder
Vals Science IndexNot measured39.1%Only Muse Wonder measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)10.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.2%Only Muse Wonder measured
APEX-Agents47.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
PostTrainBench32.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,165$9,432Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse WonderLeader
GPQA Diamond92.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LiveBench reasoning90.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured27.5%Only Muse Wonder measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)93.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)46.9%50.1%Muse Wonder
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
ARC-AGI94.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
ARC-AGI-260.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
SimpleBench60.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Chess puzzles37.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Mystery game puzzles26.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14951506Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: expert15201513Kimi K3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14961506Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Math benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse WonderLeader
OTIS Mock AIME97.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 372.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 439.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
ProofBench87.0%84.0%Kimi K3
LMArena Text: math14941486Kimi K3
LMArena Text: mathematical work15051514Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse WonderLeader
MMLU Pro88.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)71.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)66.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)49.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
SimpleQA Verified50.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LMArena Text: science15081506Kimi K3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14891512Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: legal and government15031505Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: business and finance14701483Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse WonderLeader
Design Arena: websites13361361Muse Wonder
Design Arena: UI components13451371Muse Wonder
Design Arena: game dev13611380Muse Wonder
Design Arena: data viz13501330Kimi K3
Design Arena: 3D13881425Muse Wonder
Design Arena: all code categories13611370Muse Wonder
Design Arena: SVG1301Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LiveBench design77.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index215
General benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse WonderLeader
Vals Index53.0%64.9%Muse Wonder
LiveBench data analysis78.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)68.2%70.2%Muse Wonder
SAGE (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)88.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Vals Multimodal Index73.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)88.7%80.7%Kimi K3
DTBench91.2%95.2%Muse Wonder
LMCA52.7%56.8%Muse Wonder
Surface Evolver Bench95.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Furniture assembly34.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LMArena Text14761502Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: instruction following14851491Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: creative writing14571491Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: English14811507Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: non-English14661492Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Chinese15291537Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: German1490Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1494Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1460Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LMArena Text: French14921523Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Spanish1472Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14851522Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Polish1458Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14891510Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: longer queries14941493Kimi K3
LMArena Text: writing and language14711496Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14531482Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkKimi K3Muse WonderLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K3$0.0062Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.014Fits in one request

Kimi K3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K3$0.048Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.260Fits in one request

Kimi K3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K3$0.167Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$1.00Fits in one request

Kimi K3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K3 and Muse Wonder
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K3Meta Muse Wonder
MakerMoonshot AIMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 16, 2026October 12, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.239$4.00
Output $/Mtok$11.936$20.00
Coding index61.864.5
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved task$0.81Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K3 better than Muse Wonder for coding?

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 64.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 61.8 for Kimi K3, though on 1 benchmark against 2. Pick Kimi K3 when output tokens cost 1.7x less, or when what matters is LMArena WebDev or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Muse Wonder?

Kimi K3 costs $0.239 per million input tokens and $11.936 per million output tokens; Muse Wonder costs $4.00 and $20.00. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K3 or Muse Wonder?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K3 vs Muse Wonder comparison based on?

57 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Kimi K3's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Wonder's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next