Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on coding, 82.2 to 67.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs 1.7x less per output token ($6.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 29, 2026; 31 benchmarks have a result for both.

Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI
Coding
82.2
Overall
74.4
Output $/M
$10.00
27
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
67.1
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$6.00
4
vs boards won of 31 shared

Kimi K3.1 Pro or Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which to pick

Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 67.1 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902), though on 4 benchmarks against 5.

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($6.00 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
31
Kimi K3.1 Pro only
4
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
85
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K3.1 Pro 82.2 from 4 benchmarks, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 67.1 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 20.8 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: Kimi K3.1 Pro 91.0% against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 58.0%, 33.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K3.1 Pro $10.00 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
Kimi K3.1 Pro takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K3.1 ProBarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding80
Intelligence10
Agentic work43
Reasoning30
Math20
Web design61
General30
All shared boards274
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index80
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench coding81.8%60.3%Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena WebDev16951676Kimi K3.1 Pro
AA Coding IndexNot measured76.2Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured85.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)63.6%38.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)84.9%77.1%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured24.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)81.9%68.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured24.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SciCode60.8%53.2%Kimi K3.1 Pro
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ALE-Bench1932.8Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1504Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1499Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: React17011692Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena WebDev: HTML17061657Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence Index46.033.6Kimi K3.1 Pro
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.4Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index43
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured56.0Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1301Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1305Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1222Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1201Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1217Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1052Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench research77.9%69.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro
LiveBench browser75.9%49.4%Kimi K3.1 Pro
LiveBench long agentic39.1%29.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)24.9%49.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)37.5%47.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)11.7%15.4%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured72.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)75.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)31.4%12.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Vals Science Index44.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured63.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured93.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench reasoning91.1%88.2%Kimi K3.1 Pro
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)26.1%23.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured92.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)52.5%43.1%Kimi K3.1 Pro
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured92.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured46.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured38.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1496Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1508Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1505Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured100.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBench91.0%58.0%Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1506Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1496Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MathArena59.6%51.0%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured47.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1514Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1505Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1494Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1480Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index61
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websites13251274Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: UI components14001338Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: game dev14101314Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: data viz13001283Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: 3D14511333Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: all code categories13541292Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: SVG1328Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1194Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench design77.8%78.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
General benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Vals Index62.5%59.1%Kimi K3.1 Pro
LiveBench data analysis79.1%78.4%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured81.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)86.3%80.3%Kimi K3.1 Pro
DTBenchNot measured92.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMCANot measured46.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena TextNot measured1483Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1480Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1478Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1493Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1472Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1540Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1475Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1471Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1462Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1503Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1488Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1484Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1475Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1491Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1488Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1478Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1465Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1311Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1358Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1304Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.0070Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.130Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.500Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K3.1 ProQwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerMoonshot AIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 23, 2026September 3, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$2.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$6.00
Coding index82.267.1
Independent measurements behind it45
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K3.1 Pro better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 67.1 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902), though on 4 benchmarks against 5. Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($6.00 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Kimi K3.1 Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

31 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 29, 2026. Kimi K3.1 Pro's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro-vs-qwen3-8-max-0902" title="Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902), LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro-vs-qwen3-8-max-0902">LLMBenchmark.ai, Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)</a></p>