Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads Mistral Medium 3.5 on coding, 82.2 to 25.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Mistral Medium 3.5 costs 1.3x less per output token ($7.50 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 29, 2026; 18 benchmarks have a result for both.

Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI
Coding
82.2
Overall
74.4
Output $/M
$10.00
18
Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI
Coding
25.4
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$7.50
0
vs boards won of 18 shared

Kimi K3.1 Pro or Mistral Medium 3.5: which to pick

Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 25.4 for Mistral Medium 3.5.

Pick Mistral Medium 3.5 for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($7.50 vs $10.00 per million).

Shared results
18
Kimi K3.1 Pro only
17
Mistral Medium 3.5 only
63
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K3.1 Pro 82.2 from 4 benchmarks, Mistral Medium 3.5 25.4 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 82.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: Kimi K3.1 Pro 91.0% against Mistral Medium 3.5 9.0%, 82.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K3.1 Pro $10.00 against Mistral Medium 3.5 $7.50 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Kimi K3.1 Pro takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Medium 3.5 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K3.1 ProBarsMistral Medium 3.5Ties
Coding60
Agentic work20
Reasoning10
Math10
Web design70
General10
All shared boards180
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index60
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMistral Medium 3.5Leader
LiveBench coding81.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LMArena WebDev16951264Kimi K3.1 Pro
AA Coding IndexNot measured46.9Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured66.4%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)63.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)84.9%2.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured5.1%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)81.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
SciCode60.8%40.2%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
ALE-Bench1932.8764.0Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1460Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1458Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React17011254Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena WebDev: HTML17061308Kimi K3.1 Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMistral Medium 3.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index46.0Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured141.4Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMistral Medium 3.5Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured7.0Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LiveBench research77.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench browser75.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench long agentic39.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured32.1%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)24.9%4.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)37.5%9.1%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)11.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured11.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)75.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)31.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Vals Science Index44.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured94.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMistral Medium 3.5Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured34.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LiveBench reasoning91.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)26.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured74.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)52.5%13.8%Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1437Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1432Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1445Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1254Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1230Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured41.4%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMistral Medium 3.5Leader
ProofBench91.0%9.0%Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1432Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1441Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MathArena59.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMistral Medium 3.5Leader
MMLU ProNot measured75.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured44.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured58.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured68.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured28.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured33.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1428Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1409Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1437Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1426Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMistral Medium 3.5Leader
Design Arena: websites13251141Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: UI components14001074Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: game dev14101078Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: data viz13001121Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: 3D14511057Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: all code categories13541120Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: SVG1328947Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1060Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LiveBench design77.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMistral Medium 3.5Leader
Vals Index62.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench data analysis79.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured72.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured67.7%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured34.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured68.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)86.3%69.3%Kimi K3.1 Pro
DTBenchNot measured75.5%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMCANot measured26.1%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured26.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1421Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1415Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1374Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1222Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1433Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1405Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1445Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1453Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1384Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1449Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1411Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1396Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1430Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1423Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1415Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1384Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1382Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1240Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1244Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1233Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1216Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1198Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
EQ-Bench 4Not measured983Only Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5
BenchmarkKimi K3.1 ProMistral Medium 3.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.0070Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.0053Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.130Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.098Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.500Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.5$0.375Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K3.1 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K3.1 ProMistral Medium 3.5
MakerMoonshot AIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 23, 2026April 30, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$1.50
Output $/Mtok$10.00$7.50
Coding index82.225.4
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved taskNot computable$6.02
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K3.1 Pro better than Mistral Medium 3.5 for coding?

Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 25.4 for Mistral Medium 3.5. Pick Mistral Medium 3.5 for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($7.50 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 and $7.50. Cost per solved task is known for Mistral Medium 3.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Kimi K3.1 Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.5 comparison based on?

18 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 29, 2026. Kimi K3.1 Pro's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro-vs-mistral-medium-3-5" title="Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.5, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro-vs-mistral-medium-3-5">LLMBenchmark.ai, Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.5</a></p>