Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads Granite 4.2 8B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 45.4 to 11.1, and Granite 4.2 8B costs 30.0x less per output token ($0.20 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 27 benchmarks have a result for both.

Granite 4.2 8BIBM Granite
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
0
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
67.1
Overall
70.1
Output $/M
$6.00
27
vs boards won of 27 shared

Granite 4.2 8B or Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which to pick

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 67.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Granite 4.2 8B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Granite 4.2 8B for output tokens 30.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $6.00 per million).

Shared results
27
Granite 4.2 8B only
0
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
89
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Granite 4.2 8B not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 67.1 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 54.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Agentic Index: Granite 4.2 8B 1.3 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 56.0, 54.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Granite 4.2 8B $0.20 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 30.0x apart.
Context window
Granite 4.2 8B takes 131K tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGranite 4.2 8BBarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Knowledge04
General012
All shared boards027
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1673Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
AA Coding Index22.476.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured85.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured38.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured77.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured24.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured24.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SciCode31.5%53.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: coding13781503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: software and IT13661498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1690Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1652Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence Index11.145.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.4Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic Index1.356.0Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1300Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1305Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1224Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1194Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1226Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured995Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench researchNot measured69.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured42.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured49.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured72.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured63.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured93.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)63.1%92.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)9.7%43.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured92.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured46.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured38.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13271497Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: expert13861507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13441504Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured100.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1501Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1491Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MathArenaNot measured51.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured47.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: science13351512Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13321503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: legal and government13271494Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: business and finance13221481Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1276Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1282Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1338Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1293Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1200Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index012
General benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Vals IndexNot measured59.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured51.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)45.0%80.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
DTBenchNot measured92.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMCANot measured46.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text13191484Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: instruction following13011481Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: creative writing12351477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena VisionNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: English13371492Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: non-English13001473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Chinese13651539Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1476Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1473Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1462Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1502Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1487Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: Russian12801482Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1471Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13001490Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: longer queries13241489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: writing and language12691477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12711464Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1311Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1358Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1304Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.0002Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.0046Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.018Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationIBM Granite 4.2 8BQwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerIBM GraniteQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 31, 2026September 3, 2026
Context window131K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.08$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.20$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked67.1
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 67.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Granite 4.2 8B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Granite 4.2 8B for output tokens 30.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $6.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Granite 4.2 8B costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only.

Which has the bigger context window, Granite 4.2 8B or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902), with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

27 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Granite 4.2 8B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next