Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Grok 4.6 leads Qwen3.7 Plus on coding, 65.7 to 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.7 Plus costs 4.7x less per output token ($1.28 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 70 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Grok 4.6 Replace Qwen3.7 Plus
Grok 4.6xAI
Coding
65.7
Overall
44.3
Output $/M
$6.00
36
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen
Coding
33.2
Overall
25.2
Output $/M
$1.28
34
vs boards won of 70 shared

Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.7 Plus: which to pick

Pick Grok 4.6 for coding: it scores 65.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.2 for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Pick Qwen3.7 Plus for output tokens 4.7x cheaper ($1.28 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 500K tokens).

Model AGrok 4.6xAI65.7/1006 independent benchmarks$0.82 per solved taskModel BQwen3.7 PlusQwen33.2/1002 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved task
Shared results
70
Grok 4.6 only
53
Qwen3.7 Plus only
5
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.6 65.7 from 6 benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 23.7 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
FrontierCode: Grok 4.6 48.0% against Qwen3.7 Plus 10.2%, 58.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.6 $6.00 against Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 per million output tokens, 4.7x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.6 takes 500K tokens, Qwen3.7 Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.6BarsQwen3.7 PlusTies
Coding72
Intelligence20
Agentic work50
Reasoning54
Math22
Knowledge05
Web design80
General721
All shared boards3634
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index72
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
LiveBench coding89.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev1617Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
AA Coding Index76.855.9Grok 4.6
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)95.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)17.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)76.2%46.4%Grok 4.6
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%12.9%Grok 4.6
ProgramBench (Vals AI)1.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
IOI (Vals AI)47.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)78.3%52.8%Grok 4.6
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)14.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)55.8%54.3%Grok 4.6
CyberBench (Vals AI)67.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SciCode56.5%46.1%Grok 4.6
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured47.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierCode48.0%10.2%Grok 4.6
FrontierSWE25.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
WeirdML67.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ALE-Bench1508.1Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: coding14661473Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: software and IT14571473Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena WebDev: React1631Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1597Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1603Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Intelligence Index44.325.2Grok 4.6
Epoch Capabilities Index156.6147.0Grok 4.6
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Agentic Index53.017.5Grok 4.6
Design Arena: agents building web apps1248Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1264Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1236Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1297Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1276Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1208Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1249Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench research84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench long agentic40.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.7%38.2%Grok 4.6
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)33.1%10.5%Grok 4.6
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)48.1%16.4%Grok 4.6
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)62.7%49.3%Grok 4.6
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)72.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)11.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vals Science Index38.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)5.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured93.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
APEX-Agents65.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured2.8%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Vending-Bench 2$9,047Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index54
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
GPQA Diamond94.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench reasoning91.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)30.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.9%90.0%Grok 4.6
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.1%35.6%Grok 4.6
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.0%87.9%Grok 4.6
ARC-AGI87.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-267.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SimpleBench75.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Chess puzzles33.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzles34.0%17.0%Grok 4.6
EBR-bench30.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14481460Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: expert14691466Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14451460Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: diagrams12851292Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: homework12831295Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
OTIS Mock AIME99.2%93.3%Grok 4.6
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 366.0%34.4%Grok 4.6
FrontierMath, tier 431.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ProofBench51.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: math14171467Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: mathematical work14641470Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
MMLU Pro89.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.2%66.2%Qwen3.7 Plus
MedCode (Vals AI)44.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SimpleQA Verified49.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: science14371464Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14201464Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: legal and government14291451Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: business and finance14161435Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
Design Arena: websites12891269Grok 4.6
Design Arena: UI components12951261Grok 4.6
Design Arena: game dev12961262Grok 4.6
Design Arena: data viz12821276Grok 4.6
Design Arena: 3D12771239Grok 4.6
Design Arena: all code categories12921269Grok 4.6
Design Arena: SVG12391208Grok 4.6
Design Arena: ASCII art12781143Grok 4.6
LiveBench design79.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index721
General benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
LiveBench data analysis75.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)28.9%39.3%Qwen3.7 Plus
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured53.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
IFBenchNot measured78.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)81.0%73.0%Grok 4.6
DTBench97.3%84.0%Grok 4.6
LMCA48.5%37.6%Grok 4.6
Furniture assembly40.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text14291454Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: instruction following14311439Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: creative writing14261438Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision12631278Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: English14331458Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: non-English14201445Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Chinese14761509Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: German14261471Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Japanese13781412Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Korean13911413Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: French14551472Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Spanish14141457Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Russian14211457Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Polish14301449Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: multi-turn14251459Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: longer queries14561454Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: writing and language14291437Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14211422Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: English12701280Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: Chinese12891332Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: reading text12721288Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: humor12701261Grok 4.6
LMArena Vision: creative writing12621258Grok 4.6
LMArena Document14521444Grok 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Qwen3.7 PlusLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.0050Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.0010Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.118Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.460Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.077Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.7 Plus
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.6Qwen3.7 Plus
MakerxAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026June 3, 2026
Context window500K1M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.32
Output $/Mtok$6.00$1.28
Coding index65.733.2
Independent measurements behind it62
Cost per solved task$0.82Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Qwen3.7 Plus for coding?

Pick Grok 4.6 for coding: it scores 65.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.2 for Qwen3.7 Plus. Pick Qwen3.7 Plus for output tokens 4.7x cheaper ($1.28 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 500K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 and $1.28. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus, with 1M tokens against 500K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison based on?

70 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Grok 4.6's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Plus's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/grok-4-6-vs-qwen3-7-plus" title="Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.7 Plus, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/grok-4-6-vs-qwen3-7-plus">LLMBenchmark.ai, Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.7 Plus</a></p>