Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus leads Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on coding, 33.2 to 32.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.7 Plus costs 9.4x less per output token ($1.28 vs $12.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 71 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Replace Qwen3.7 Plus

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle

Coding: 32.3
Overall: 54.0
Output $/M: $12.00

Qwen3.7 PlusQwen

Coding: 33.2
Overall: 54.0
Output $/M: $1.28

vs boards won of 71 shared

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3.7 Plus: which to pick

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus are level for coding, 32.3 against 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide.

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens) and work measured by AA Coding Index or Code migration (Vals AI), where it leads. Pick Qwen3.7 Plus for output tokens 9.4x cheaper ($1.28 vs $12.00 per million) and work measured by Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) or AA Agentic Index, where it leads.

Model AGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle32.3/1004 independent benchmarks$0.99 per solved task Model BQwen3.7 PlusQwen33.2/1002 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved task

71624

Shared results: 71
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only: 62
Qwen3.7 Plus only: 4
Like-for-like categories: 8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Level: 32.3 against 33.2, inside 2 points.
4 and 2 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads, 29.7 against 25.2.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus leads, 17.5 against 8.2.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a GPQA Diamond result, 95.5%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a AIME result, 98.1%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a MMLU Pro result, 91.0%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus leads, 1269 against 1233.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview takes 1.05M tokens against 1M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $0.0080, Qwen3.7 Plus $0.0010 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the number, $0.99.
Directional only

At a glance

Coding index: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 32.3 from 4 benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category: Coding, 9.2 points apart on average over 8 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap: FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 59.6% against Qwen3.7 Plus 34.4%, 25.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $12.00 against Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 per million output tokens, 9.4x apart.
Context window: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.7 Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Category	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Qwen3.7 Plus
Coding	7	1
Intelligence	1	0
Agentic work	4	2
Reasoning	9	0
Math	4	0
Knowledge	5	0
Web design	2	6
General	28	2
All shared boards	60	11

CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index71

Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Qwen3.7 Plus	Leader
LMArena WebDev	1447	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
AA Coding Index	68.8	55.9	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)	88.5%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)	78.8%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)	2.5%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)	32.0%	46.4%	Qwen3.7 Plus
Code migration (Vals AI)	17.3%	12.9%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
ProgramBench (Vals AI)	0.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)	51.8%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)	70.8%	52.8%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)	6.7%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)	Not measured	54.3%	Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SciCode	58.7%	46.1%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)	53.8%	47.0%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Terminal-Bench	80.2%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FrontierCode	Not measured	10.2%	Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
GSO-Bench	22.6%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
WeirdML	72.1%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MirrorCode	8.9%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ALE-Bench	1160.6	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: coding	1484	1473	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT	1487	1473	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena WebDev: React	1438	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML	1490	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image	1481	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SciCode	14.3%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here

IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10

Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Qwen3.7 Plus	Leader
AA Intelligence Index	29.7	25.2	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Epoch Capabilities Index	Not measured	147.0	Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured

Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index42

Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Qwen3.7 Plus	Leader
AA Agentic Index	8.2	17.5	Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: agents building web apps	1125	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps	1068	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps	1094	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps	1049	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games	1236	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building games	1113	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: HTML slides	1103	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides	1041	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)	0.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)	43.0%	38.2%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)	9.3%	10.5%	Qwen3.7 Plus
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)	20.7%	16.4%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)	52.6%	49.3%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)	60.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)	1.4%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Science Index	27.4%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom	95.6%	93.0%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
APEX-Agents	35.1%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
METR time horizons	77.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
OSWorld 2.0	Not measured	2.8%	Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
BALROG	57.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
DeepResearch Bench	47.8%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
PostTrainBench	22.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vending-Bench 2	$911	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here

ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index90

Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Qwen3.7 Plus	Leader
GPQA Diamond	95.5%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)	20.7%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)	88.2%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)	94.1%	90.0%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)	47.0%	35.6%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)	94.4%	87.9%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
ARC-AGI	98.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGI-2	77.1%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SimpleBench	79.6%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Chess puzzles	51.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Mystery game puzzles	34.0%	17.0%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
EBR-bench	14.3%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts	1485	1460	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: expert	1483	1466	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English	1480	1460	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision: diagrams	1311	1292	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision: homework	1316	1295	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here

MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40

Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Qwen3.7 Plus	Leader
AIME	98.1%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
OTIS Mock AIME	95.6%	93.3%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3	59.6%	34.4%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
FrontierMath, tier 4	26.8%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProofBench	26.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: math	1486	1467	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work	1478	1470	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here

KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50

Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Qwen3.7 Plus	Leader
MMLU Pro	91.0%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)	87.4%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)	64.8%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)	64.5%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)	72.9%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)	69.4%	66.2%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MedQA (Vals AI)	96.4%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)	59.1%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SimpleQA Verified	73.5%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: science	1497	1464	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare	1486	1464	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: legal and government	1487	1451	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: business and finance	1459	1435	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
FACTS Benchmark Suite	67.4%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here

Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index26

Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Qwen3.7 Plus	Leader
Design Arena: websites	1233	1269	Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: UI components	1224	1258	Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: game dev	1202	1261	Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: data viz	1209	1276	Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: 3D	1234	1238	Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: all code categories	1231	1269	Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: SVG	1285	1208	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Design Arena: ASCII art	1270	1143	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here

GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index282

General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Qwen3.7 Plus	Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)	53.8%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)	48.7%	39.3%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MedScribe (Vals AI)	76.1%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Multimodal Index	56.1%	53.9%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
IFBench	77.1%	78.0%	Qwen3.7 Plus
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)	82.0%	73.0%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
DTBench	97.1%	84.0%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMCA	53.8%	37.6%	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
CL-bench	20.8%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Furniture assembly	26.7%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ExploitBench	26.1%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CL-bench Life	16.9%	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text	1480	1454	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following	1466	1439	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing	1482	1438	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision	1296	1278	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: English	1478	1458	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: non-English	1476	1445	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese	1527	1509	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: German	1490	1471	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Japanese	1491	1412	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Korean	1455	1413	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: French	1487	1472	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Spanish	1481	1457	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Russian	1497	1457	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Polish	1498	1449	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: multi-turn	1487	1459	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries	1482	1454	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: writing and language	1481	1437	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media	1465	1422	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision: English	1287	1280	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision: Chinese	1364	1332	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision: reading text	1304	1288	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision: humor	1322	1261	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision: captioning	1345	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things	1330	Not measured	Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing	1324	1258	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Document	1444	1444	Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here

Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared

Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
Benchmark	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Qwen3.7 Plus	Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.0080Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus$0.0010Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.136Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.520Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus$0.077Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus
Specification	Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	Qwen3.7 Plus
Maker	Google	Qwen
Weights	No public weights listed	No public weights listed
Released	February 19, 2026	June 3, 2026
Context window	1.05M	1M
Input $/Mtok	$2.00	$0.32
Output $/Mtok	$12.00	$1.28
Coding index	32.3	33.2
Independent measurements behind it	4	2
Cost per solved task	$0.99	Not computable
Source	OpenRouter listing	OpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Qwen3.7 Plus for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus are level for coding, 32.3 against 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide. Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens) and work measured by AA Coding Index or Code migration (Vals AI), where it leads. Pick Qwen3.7 Plus for output tokens 9.4x cheaper ($1.28 vs $12.00 per million) and work measured by Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) or AA Agentic Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 and $1.28. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison based on?

71 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Plus's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-qwen3-7-plus" title="Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.7 Plus, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-qwen3-7-plus">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.7 Plus</a></p>

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3.7 Plus: which to pick

Which one for your work

Coding

Intelligence

Agentic work

Reasoning

Math

Knowledge

Web design

Long documents

Everyday cost

Cost per solved task

At a glance

Benchmark by benchmark

What each workload costs

Chat turn

Repository review

Agent loop

Specification differences

Questions

Compare next