Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.6 vs MiniMax M2.1

Grok 4.6 leads MiniMax M2.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 44.3 to 20.9, and MiniMax M2.1 costs 5.0x less per output token ($1.20 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 21 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.6xAI
Coding
65.7
Overall
67.4
Output $/M
$6.00
21
MiniMax M2.1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
0
vs boards won of 21 shared

Grok 4.6 or MiniMax M2.1: which to pick

Only Grok 4.6 has a coding score, 65.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M2.1 for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($1.20 vs $6.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.59 against $0.82).

Shared results
21
Grok 4.6 only
102
MiniMax M2.1 only
13
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.6 65.7 from 6 benchmarks, MiniMax M2.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 23.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: Grok 4.6 1508.1 against MiniMax M2.1 623.8, 29.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.6 $6.00 against MiniMax M2.1 $1.20 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.6 takes 500K tokens, MiniMax M2.1 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.6BarsMiniMax M2.1Ties
Coding30
Intelligence10
Reasoning30
Knowledge50
Web design70
General20
All shared boards210
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGrok 4.6MiniMax M2.1Leader
LiveBench coding89.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev1617Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
AA Coding Index76.8Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.2%81.8%Grok 4.6
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)95.6%74.8%Grok 4.6
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)17.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)1.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
IOI (Vals AI)47.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)78.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)14.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)67.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured81.0%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
SciCode56.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured36.6%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
FrontierCode48.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierSWE25.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
WeirdML67.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ALE-Bench1508.1623.8Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: coding1466Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1457Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1631Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1597Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1603Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGrok 4.6MiniMax M2.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index44.320.9Grok 4.6
Epoch Capabilities Index156.6Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGrok 4.6MiniMax M2.1Leader
AA Agentic Index53.0Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1248Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1264Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1234Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1291Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1276Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1210Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1200Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1216Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench research84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench long agentic40.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)33.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)48.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)62.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)72.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)11.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vals Science Index38.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)5.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured85.4%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
APEX-Agents65.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2$9,047Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGrok 4.6MiniMax M2.1Leader
GPQA Diamond94.7%78.5%Grok 4.6
LiveBench reasoning91.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)30.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.9%83.0%Grok 4.6
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.1%23.2%Grok 4.6
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI87.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-267.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SimpleBench75.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Chess puzzles33.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzles34.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
EBR-bench30.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1448Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: expert1469Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1445Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1285Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1283Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGrok 4.6MiniMax M2.1Leader
AIMENot measured77.9%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured89.0%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured82.7Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.7%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIME99.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 366.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tier 431.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ProofBench51.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: math1417Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1464Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGrok 4.6MiniMax M2.1Leader
MMLU Pro89.4%87.0%Grok 4.6
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.3%75.5%Grok 4.6
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured55.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.2%58.9%Grok 4.6
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%66.3%Grok 4.6
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured91.2%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.7%34.1%Grok 4.6
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured87.5%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
SimpleQA Verified49.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: science1437Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1420Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1429Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1416Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGrok 4.6MiniMax M2.1Leader
Design Arena: websites12891201Grok 4.6
Design Arena: UI components12931220Grok 4.6
Design Arena: game dev12951134Grok 4.6
Design Arena: data viz12821206Grok 4.6
Design Arena: 3D12751164Grok 4.6
Design Arena: all code categories12921190Grok 4.6
Design Arena: SVG12381131Grok 4.6
Design Arena: ASCII art1279Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench design79.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGrok 4.6MiniMax M2.1Leader
LiveBench data analysis75.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)28.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.5%80.8%Grok 4.6
IFBenchNot measured69.9%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)81.0%67.7%Grok 4.6
DTBench97.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMCA48.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Furniture assembly40.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text1429Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1431Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1426Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision1263Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: English1433Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1420Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1476Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: German1426Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1378Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1391Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: French1455Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1414Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1421Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1430Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1425Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1456Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1429Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1421Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: English1270Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1289Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1272Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1270Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1262Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Document1452Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGrok 4.6MiniMax M2.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.0050Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.1$0.0009Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.118Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.1$0.019Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.460Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.1$0.072Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.6 and MiniMax M2.1
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.6MiniMax M2.1
MakerxAIMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026December 23, 2025
Context window500K205K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.30
Output $/Mtok$6.00$1.20
Coding index65.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it61
Cost per solved task$0.82$0.59
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than MiniMax M2.1 for coding?

Only Grok 4.6 has a coding score, 65.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M2.1 for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($1.20 vs $6.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.59 against $0.82).

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or MiniMax M2.1?

Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2.1 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Grok 4.6 costs $0.82 and MiniMax M2.1 $0.59.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.6 or MiniMax M2.1?

Grok 4.6, with 500K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.6 vs MiniMax M2.1 comparison based on?

21 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Grok 4.6's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2.1's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next