Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.6 vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads Grok 4.6 on coding, 71.9 to 65.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Grok 4.6 costs 3.3x less per output token ($6.00 vs $20.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 55 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.6xAI
Coding
65.7
Overall
67.4
Output $/M
$6.00
4
Muse WonderMeta
Coding
71.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
51
vs boards won of 55 shared

Grok 4.6 or Muse Wonder: which to pick

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 65.7 for Grok 4.6, though on 3 benchmarks against 6.

Pick Grok 4.6 for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($6.00 vs $20.00 per million) and work measured by BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) or MysteryMechanism (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
55
Grok 4.6 only
68
Muse Wonder only
5
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.6 65.7 from 6 benchmarks, Muse Wonder 71.9 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 17.6 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): Grok 4.6 17.2% against Muse Wonder 49.5%, 43.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.6 $6.00 against Muse Wonder $20.00 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.6 takes 500K tokens, Muse Wonder 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.6BarsMuse WonderTies
Coding012
Intelligence01
Agentic work17
Reasoning14
Math03
Knowledge04
Web design06
General214
All shared boards451
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index012
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse WonderLeader
LiveBench coding89.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev16171652Muse Wonder
AA Coding Index76.8Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)95.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)17.2%49.5%Muse Wonder
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)76.2%83.1%Muse Wonder
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%62.5%Muse Wonder
ProgramBench (Vals AI)1.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
IOI (Vals AI)47.6%66.9%Muse Wonder
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)78.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)14.8%26.6%Muse Wonder
SkillsBench (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)67.7%80.4%Muse Wonder
SciCode56.5%60.3%Muse Wonder
FrontierCode48.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierSWE25.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
WeirdML67.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ALE-Bench1508.1Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: coding14661522Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: software and IT14571515Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: React16311641Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: HTML15971694Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: from an image1603Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse WonderLeader
AA Intelligence Index44.3Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index156.6161.8Muse Wonder
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse WonderLeader
AA Agentic Index53.0Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1248Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1264Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1234Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1291Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1276Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1210Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1200Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1216Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1260Only Muse Wonder measured
LiveBench research84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench long agentic40.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.7%56.6%Muse Wonder
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)33.1%36.3%Muse Wonder
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)48.1%50.5%Muse Wonder
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured23.8%Only Muse Wonder measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)62.7%67.1%Muse Wonder
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)72.2%67.0%Grok 4.6
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)11.4%22.9%Muse Wonder
Vals Science Index38.1%39.1%Muse Wonder
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)5.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.2%Only Muse Wonder measured
APEX-Agents65.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2$9,047$9,432Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse WonderLeader
GPQA Diamond94.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench reasoning91.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)30.6%27.5%Grok 4.6
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.1%50.1%Muse Wonder
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI87.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-267.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SimpleBench75.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Chess puzzles33.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzles34.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
EBR-bench30.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14481506Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: expert14691513Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14451506Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision: diagrams1285Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1283Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse WonderLeader
OTIS Mock AIME99.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 366.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tier 431.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
ProofBench51.0%84.0%Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: math14171486Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: mathematical work14641514Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse WonderLeader
MMLU Pro89.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
SimpleQA Verified49.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: science14371506Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14201512Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: legal and government14291505Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: business and finance14161483Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse WonderLeader
Design Arena: websites12891363Muse Wonder
Design Arena: UI components12931380Muse Wonder
Design Arena: game dev12951378Muse Wonder
Design Arena: data viz12821312Muse Wonder
Design Arena: 3D12751428Muse Wonder
Design Arena: all code categories12921371Muse Wonder
Design Arena: SVG1238Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1279Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench design79.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index214
General benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse WonderLeader
Vals IndexNot measured64.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
LiveBench data analysis75.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.8%70.2%Muse Wonder
SAGE (Vals AI)28.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)81.0%80.7%Grok 4.6
DTBench97.3%95.2%Grok 4.6
LMCA48.5%56.8%Muse Wonder
Furniture assembly40.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text14291502Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: instruction following14311491Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: creative writing14261491Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision1263Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: English14331507Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: non-English14201492Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Chinese14761537Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: German1426Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1378Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1391Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: French14551523Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Spanish1414Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14211522Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Polish1430Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14251510Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: longer queries14561493Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: writing and language14291496Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14211482Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision: English1270Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1289Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1272Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1270Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1262Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Document1452Not measuredOnly Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse WonderLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.0050Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.014Fits in one request

Grok 4.6 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.118Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.260Fits in one request

Grok 4.6 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.6$0.460Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$1.00Fits in one request

Grok 4.6 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.6 and Muse Wonder
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.6Meta Muse Wonder
MakerxAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026October 12, 2026
Context window500K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$4.00
Output $/Mtok$6.00$20.00
Coding index65.771.9
Independent measurements behind it63
Cost per solved task$0.82Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Muse Wonder for coding?

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 65.7 for Grok 4.6, though on 3 benchmarks against 6. Pick Grok 4.6 for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($6.00 vs $20.00 per million) and work measured by BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) or MysteryMechanism (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Muse Wonder?

Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Muse Wonder costs $4.00 and $20.00. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.6 or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.6 vs Muse Wonder comparison based on?

55 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Grok 4.6's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Muse Wonder's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/grok-4-6-vs-meta-muse-wonder" title="Grok 4.6 vs Muse Wonder, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/grok-4-6-vs-meta-muse-wonder">LLMBenchmark.ai, Grok 4.6 vs Muse Wonder</a></p>