Grok 4.5 vs Kimi K3
Updated October 21, 2026. 107 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick Grok 4.5 for coding: it scores 75.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 61.8 for Kimi K3.
Pick Kimi K3 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 500K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena WebDev or AA Coding Index, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 107
- Grok 4.5 only
- 13
- Kimi K3 only
- 10
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
Grok 4.5
Grok 4.5 scores 75.5 against 61.8.
2 benchmarks behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Kimi K3
Kimi K3 leads, 43.6 against 38.8.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Kimi K3
Kimi K3 leads, 50.0 against 41.2.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Tied at 92.9%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Grok 4.5
Grok 4.5 leads, 89.2% against 88.0%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Kimi K3
Kimi K3 leads, 1336 against 1281.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Kimi K3 has a Vals Index result, 53.0%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Kimi K3
Kimi K3 takes 1.05M tokens against 500K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Grok 4.5
Grok 4.5 $0.0050, Kimi K3 $0.0062 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
Grok 4.5
Grok 4.5 $0.62, Kimi K3 $0.81.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Grok 4.5 75.5 from 2 benchmarks, Kimi K3 61.8 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 16.0 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- ProofBench: Grok 4.5 31.0% against Kimi K3 87.0%, 56.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Grok 4.5 $6.00 against Kimi K3 $11.936 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
- Context window
- Grok 4.5 takes 500K tokens, Kimi K3 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Grok 4.5 | Bars | Kimi K3 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 3 | 18 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 4 | 16 | ||
| Reasoning | 2 | 10 | 1 tie | |
| Math | 1 | 5 | ||
| Knowledge | 1 | 10 | ||
| Web design | 1 | 7 | ||
| General | 1 | 25 | ||
| All shared boards | 13 | 93 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index318
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 94.3% | 59.3% | Grok 4.5 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1553 | 1655 | Kimi K3 |
| AA Coding Index | 72.4 | 76.2 | Kimi K3 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 87.3% | 87.2% | Grok 4.5 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 86.6% | 93.4% | Kimi K3 |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 8.6% | 17.2% | Kimi K3 |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 69.0% | 85.0% | Kimi K3 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 36.6% | 16.1% | Grok 4.5 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 2.0% | Kimi K3 |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 40.6% | 48.9% | Kimi K3 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 67.8% | 80.9% | Kimi K3 |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 18.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 66.0% | Not measured | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 71.0% | 75.2% | Kimi K3 |
| SciCode | 55.0% | 59.5% | Kimi K3 |
| FrontierCode | 42.4% | 44.2% | Kimi K3 |
| FrontierSWE | Not measured | 25.9% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| WeirdML | 46.4% | 82.6% | Kimi K3 |
| ALE-Bench | 1309.3 | 1524.5 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1474 | 1508 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1471 | 1499 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1556 | 1670 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1567 | 1644 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1562 | 1579 | Kimi K3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 38.8 | 43.6 | Kimi K3 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.1 | 157.9 | Kimi K3 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index416
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index210
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.9% | 92.9% | Tie |
| LiveBench reasoning | 87.2% | 90.7% | Kimi K3 |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 61.8% | 88.2% | Kimi K3 |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 93.1% | 93.5% | Kimi K3 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 42.7% | 46.9% | Kimi K3 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 93.4% | 93.1% | Grok 4.5 |
| ARC-AGI | 87.2% | 94.5% | Kimi K3 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 52.6% | 60.4% | Kimi K3 |
| SimpleBench | 70.0% | 60.7% | Grok 4.5 |
| Chess puzzles | 35.0% | 37.0% | Kimi K3 |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 26.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1462 | 1495 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1465 | 1520 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1464 | 1496 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1304 | Not measured | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1295 | Not measured | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 97.8% | 97.2% | Grok 4.5 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 57.2% | 72.2% | Kimi K3 |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 24.4% | 39.0% | Kimi K3 |
| ProofBench | 31.0% | 87.0% | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: math | 1460 | 1494 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1482 | 1505 | Kimi K3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index110
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 89.2% | 88.0% | Grok 4.5 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 86.0% | 86.2% | Kimi K3 |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 67.4% | 71.6% | Kimi K3 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 71.7% | 75.7% | Kimi K3 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 61.8% | 66.3% | Kimi K3 |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 43.3% | 49.4% | Kimi K3 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 48.3% | 50.6% | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: science | 1464 | 1508 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1440 | 1489 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1463 | 1503 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1441 | 1470 | Kimi K3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1281 | 1336 | Kimi K3 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1279 | 1345 | Kimi K3 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1263 | 1361 | Kimi K3 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1267 | 1350 | Kimi K3 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1257 | 1388 | Kimi K3 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1276 | 1361 | Kimi K3 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1215 | 1301 | Kimi K3 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1257 | Not measured | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench design | 78.1% | 77.2% | Grok 4.5 |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index125
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 53.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | 73.0% | 78.7% | Kimi K3 |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 35.0% | 52.8% | Kimi K3 |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 86.9% | 88.0% | Kimi K3 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 63.4% | 73.4% | Kimi K3 |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 79.3% | 88.7% | Kimi K3 |
| DTBench | 96.5% | 91.2% | Grok 4.5 |
| LMCA | 45.2% | 52.7% | Kimi K3 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 74.4% | 95.0% | Kimi K3 |
| Furniture assembly | 22.5% | 34.2% | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1476 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1445 | 1485 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1442 | 1457 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Vision | 1287 | Not measured | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1453 | 1481 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1440 | 1466 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1495 | 1529 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1448 | 1490 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1430 | 1494 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1406 | 1460 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1457 | 1492 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1451 | 1472 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1449 | 1485 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1432 | 1458 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1456 | 1489 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1462 | 1494 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1445 | 1471 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1434 | 1453 | Kimi K3 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1285 | Not measured | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1345 | Not measured | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1293 | Not measured | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1276 | Not measured | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1293 | Not measured | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Document | 1452 | Not measured | Only Grok 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Grok 4.5 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Kimi K3 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Kimi K3 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | SpaceXAI Grok 4.5 | MoonshotAI Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | xAI | Moonshot AI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | July 8, 2026 | July 16, 2026 |
| Context window | 500K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.00 | $0.239 |
| Output $/Mtok | $6.00 | $11.936 |
| Coding index | 75.5 | 61.8 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.62 | $0.81 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Grok 4.5 better than Kimi K3 for coding?
Pick Grok 4.5 for coding: it scores 75.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 61.8 for Kimi K3. Pick Kimi K3 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 500K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena WebDev or AA Coding Index, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or Kimi K3?
Grok 4.5 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Kimi K3 costs $0.239 and $11.936. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Grok 4.5 costs $0.62 and Kimi K3 $0.81.
Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.5 or Kimi K3?
Kimi K3, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.
How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.5 vs Kimi K3 comparison based on?
107 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Grok 4.5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Kimi K3's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.