Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.3 vs Muse Ember

Muse Ember leads Grok 4.3 on coding, 64.9 to 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Muse Ember costs 5.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $2.50 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.3xAI
Coding
37.4
Overall
56.8
Output $/M
$2.50
0
Muse EmberMeta
Coding
64.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.50
7
vs boards won of 7 shared

Grok 4.3 or Muse Ember: which to pick

Pick Muse Ember for coding: it scores 64.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.4 for Grok 4.3.

Grok 4.3 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
7
Grok 4.3 only
100
Muse Ember only
8
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.3 37.4 from 3 benchmarks, Muse Ember 64.9 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 44.3 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Grok 4.3 19.4% against Muse Ember 83.7%, 64.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.3 $2.50 against Muse Ember $0.50 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.3 takes 1M tokens, Muse Ember 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.3BarsMuse EmberTies
Coding05
Agentic work02
All shared boards07
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Muse EmberLeader
LMArena WebDev13571609Muse Ember
AA Coding Index42.2Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)71.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured39.4%Only Muse Ember measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)19.4%83.7%Muse Ember
Code migration (Vals AI)6.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)42.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)40.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SciCode48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)0.0%40.9%Muse Ember
FrontierCode 2.0Not measured27.2%Only Muse Ember measured
WeirdML49.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ALE-Bench944.2Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: coding1414Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1416Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: React13521616Muse Ember
LMArena WebDev: HTML13671621Muse Ember
LMArena WebDev: from an image1376Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Muse EmberLeader
Neither model has a result on 2 boards here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Muse EmberLeader
AA Agentic Index15.5Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1101Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps982Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1050Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps956Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games917Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building games951Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides903Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides981Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets930Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)37.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)6.2%38.2%Muse Ember
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)15.4%49.0%Muse Ember
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured25.0%Only Muse Ember measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)18.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom97.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured64.3%Only Muse Ember measured
Vending-Bench 2$35Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Search1166Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Muse EmberLeader
GPQA Diamond91.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)37.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.1%Only Muse Ember measured
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured39.0%Only Muse Ember measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)88.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Chess puzzles18.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1396Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: expert1386Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1401Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1242Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Muse EmberLeader
OTIS Mock AIME93.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 342.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 414.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ProofBench11.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: math1387Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1396Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Muse EmberLeader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)38.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
AA-OmniscienceNot measured7.7Only Muse Ember measured
SimpleQA Verified33.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
GeoBench56.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: science1399Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1384Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1386Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1381Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Muse EmberLeader
Design Arena: websites1186Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1185Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1161Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1176Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1104Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1175Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: SVG1071Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1121Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index34 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Muse EmberLeader
Vals IndexNot measured60.5%Only Muse Ember measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)74.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Vals Multimodal Index43.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
IFBench83.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)75.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
GDPval-AA949Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
DTBench90.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMCA38.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text1397Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1366Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1380Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: English1404Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1386Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1422Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: German1397Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1378Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1352Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: French1412Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1399Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1398Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1398Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1407Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1393Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1385Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1370Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: English1236Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1257Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1234Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1223Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1220Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
EQ-Bench 41065Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Muse EmberLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.0025Fits in one request
Muse Ember$0.0003Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.070Fits in one request
Muse Ember$0.0065Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.275Fits in one request
Muse Ember$0.025Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.3 and Muse Ember
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.3Meta Muse Ember
MakerxAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 30, 2026November 9, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.10
Output $/Mtok$2.50$0.50
Coding index37.464.9
Independent measurements behind it33
Cost per solved task$0.31Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Muse Ember for coding?

Pick Muse Ember for coding: it scores 64.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.4 for Grok 4.3. Grok 4.3 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or Muse Ember?

Grok 4.3 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Muse Ember costs $0.10 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.3 or Muse Ember?

Muse Ember, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.3 vs Muse Ember comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Grok 4.3's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Muse Ember's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/grok-4-3-vs-meta-muse-ember" title="Grok 4.3 vs Muse Ember, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/grok-4-3-vs-meta-muse-ember">LLMBenchmark.ai, Grok 4.3 vs Muse Ember</a></p>