Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-6 Luna vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 leads GPT-6 Luna on coding, 70.3 to 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GPT-6 Luna costs 8.5x less per output token ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 72 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-6 LunaOpenAI
Coding
57.3
Overall
59.7
Output $/M
$0.50
19
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.0
Output $/M
$4.25
53
vs boards won of 72 shared

GPT-6 Luna or Muse Spark 1.1: which to pick

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.3 for GPT-6 Luna, though on 3 benchmarks against 5.

Pick GPT-6 Luna for output tokens 8.5x cheaper ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1.05M tokens).

Shared results
72
GPT-6 Luna only
32
Muse Spark 1.1 only
32
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-6 Luna 57.3 from 5 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 70.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Knowledge, 15.9 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: GPT-6 Luna 64.0% against Muse Spark 1.1 39.0%, 25.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-6 Luna $0.50 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 8.5x apart.
Context window
GPT-6 Luna takes 1.05M tokens, Muse Spark 1.1 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-6 LunaBarsMuse Spark 1.1Ties
Coding83
Intelligence20
Agentic work25
Reasoning16
Math12
Knowledge06
Web design35
General226
All shared boards1953
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index83
Coding benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark 1.1Leader
LiveBench coding84.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev15781542GPT-6 Luna
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.3Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)13.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)81.7%72.2%GPT-6 Luna
Code migration (Vals AI)42.5%31.1%GPT-6 Luna
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%0.0%GPT-6 Luna
IOI (Vals AI)55.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)73.0%69.3%GPT-6 Luna
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)37.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)76.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SciCode54.6%58.8%Muse Spark 1.1
FrontierCode42.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ALE-Bench1576.9Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: coding14371498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: software and IT14231498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: React15731532GPT-6 Luna
LMArena WebDev: HTML15951540GPT-6 Luna
LMArena WebDev: from an image15711540GPT-6 Luna
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnANot measured42.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE Atlas: Test WritingNot measured41.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index38.133.7GPT-6 Luna
Epoch Capabilities Index156.8154.1GPT-6 Luna
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured25.8Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps11911207Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps11581199Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps11311175Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1178Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1103Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1183Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1145Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1134Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1021Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveBench research43.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench browser72.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench long agentic48.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SREBench (Vals AI)2.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)49.9%57.2%Muse Spark 1.1
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)19.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)30.3%38.0%Muse Spark 1.1
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)68.5%56.4%GPT-6 Luna
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)61.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Vals Science Index28.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
APEX-Agents44.3%31.8%GPT-6 Luna
SpireClimb0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,520Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MCP AtlasNot measured88.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark 1.1Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured91.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveBench reasoning81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)19.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)38.5%46.2%Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ARC-AGI86.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ARC-AGI-259.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Chess puzzles36.0%34.0%GPT-6 Luna
Mystery game puzzles7.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14101485Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: expert14421478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14101480Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: diagrams12451305Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: homework12611287Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Math benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark 1.1Leader
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 378.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
FrontierMath, tier 456.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ProofBench64.0%39.0%GPT-6 Luna
LMArena Text: math14091482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work14271487Muse Spark 1.1
MathArenaNot measured42.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark 1.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured71.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured79.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SimpleQA Verified41.4%57.8%Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: science13861484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13521479Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: legal and government14001481Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: business and finance13881470Muse Spark 1.1
FACTS Benchmark Suite63.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
PRBench FinanceNot measured55.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
PRBench Legal42.9%57.0%Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index35
Web design benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Design Arena: websites12711270GPT-6 Luna
Design Arena: UI components12951287GPT-6 Luna
Design Arena: game dev12581269Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: data viz12171267Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: 3D12181259Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: all code categories12701276Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: SVG12531234GPT-6 Luna
Design Arena: ASCII art11531269Muse Spark 1.1
LiveBench design82.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index226
General benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Vals Index52.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench data analysis73.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)57.6%61.3%Muse Spark 1.1
SAGE (Vals AI)48.1%45.6%GPT-6 Luna
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.7%88.9%Muse Spark 1.1
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured66.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.3%77.7%GPT-6 Luna
DTBench90.1%94.4%Muse Spark 1.1
LMCA44.5%49.9%Muse Spark 1.1
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured52.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Furniture assembly44.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text13891478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: instruction following14081457Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: creative writing13631435Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision12161293Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: English13931478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: non-English13811471Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Chinese14271515Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: German13761469Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Japanese13691450Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Korean13591459Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: French14081492Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Spanish13911464Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Russian13921482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Polish13831499Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn13921484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: longer queries14081462Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: writing and language13841448Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13641438Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: English12041292Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: Chinese12661348Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: reading text12251301Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1288Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12051253Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena DocumentNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MultiChallengeNot measured75.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1260Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-6 Luna$0.0003Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-6 Luna$0.0065Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-6 Luna$0.025Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-6 Luna and Muse Spark 1.1
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-6 LunaMeta Muse Spark 1.1
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2026July 16, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.50$4.25
Coding index57.370.3
Independent measurements behind it53
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-6 Luna better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.3 for GPT-6 Luna, though on 3 benchmarks against 5. Pick GPT-6 Luna for output tokens 8.5x cheaper ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1.05M tokens).

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or Muse Spark 1.1?

GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6 Luna or Muse Spark 1.1?

GPT-6 Luna, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-6 Luna vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?

72 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-6 Luna's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.1's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-6-luna-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-1" title="GPT-6 Luna vs Muse Spark 1.1, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-6-luna-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-1">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-6 Luna vs Muse Spark 1.1</a></p>