LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-6 Luna vs Kimi K2 0711

Updated October 21, 2026. 9 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-6 LunaOpenAI
Coding
71.4
Overall
38.1
Output $/M
$0.50
9
Kimi K2 0711Moonshot AI
Coding
64.7
Overall
12.7
Output $/M
$2.30
0
vs boards won of 9 shared

Decision reading

GPT-6 Luna scores 71.4 and Kimi K2 0711 64.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking.

Pick GPT-6 Luna when output tokens cost 4.6x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 131K tokens.

Shared results
9
GPT-6 Luna only
93
Kimi K2 0711 only
27
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-6 Luna 71.4 from 2 benchmarks, Kimi K2 0711 64.7 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 31.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: GPT-6 Luna 1259 against Kimi K2 0711 974, 35.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-6 Luna $0.50 against Kimi K2 0711 $2.30 per million output tokens, 4.6x apart.
Context window
GPT-6 Luna takes 1.05M tokens, Kimi K2 0711 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-6 LunaBarsKimi K2 0711Ties
Intelligence20
Reasoning10
Web design50
General10
All shared boards90
CodingDirectional onlyFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index26 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaKimi K2 0711Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured59.1%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured71.2%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
LiveBench coding84.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev1578Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured70.5%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)13.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)81.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Code migration (Vals AI)42.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
IOI (Vals AI)55.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)73.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)37.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)76.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured55.6%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
SciCode54.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured15.9%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured27.8%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
FrontierCode42.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
GSO-BenchNot measured4.9%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
WeirdMLNot measured39.4%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
ALE-Bench1576.9Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: coding1437Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1423Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev: React1573Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1595Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1571Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaKimi K2 0711Leader
AA Intelligence Index38.112.7GPT-6 Luna
Epoch Capabilities Index156.8140.0GPT-6 Luna
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaKimi K2 0711Leader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1189Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1158Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1133Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench research43.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench browser72.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench long agentic48.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SREBench (Vals AI)2.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)49.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)19.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)30.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)61.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Vals Science Index28.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured61.1%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
APEX-Agents44.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SpireClimb0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaKimi K2 0711Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured71.5%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
LiveBench reasoning81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)19.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured76.6%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)38.5%7.4%GPT-6 Luna
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ARC-AGI86.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ARC-AGI-259.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SimpleBenchNot measured26.3%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
Chess puzzles36.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Mystery game puzzles7.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1410Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: expert1442Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1410Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1245Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: homework1261Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaKimi K2 0711Leader
AIMENot measured62.7%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured94.2%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured91.0%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured57.0Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured57.0%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 378.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
FrontierMath, tier 456.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ProofBench64.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: math1409Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1427Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaKimi K2 0711Leader
MMLU ProNot measured79.4%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured81.5%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured50.4%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured70.2%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured84.0%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.4%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
SimpleQA Verified41.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: science1386Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1352Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1400Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1388Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaKimi K2 0711Leader
Design Arena: websites12721050GPT-6 Luna
Design Arena: UI components12971030GPT-6 Luna
Design Arena: game dev1259974GPT-6 Luna
Design Arena: data viz12151018GPT-6 Luna
Design Arena: 3D1217Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: all code categories12711034GPT-6 Luna
Design Arena: SVG1253Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1156Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench design82.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaKimi K2 0711Leader
Vals Index52.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench data analysis73.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SAGE (Vals AI)48.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
IFBenchNot measured41.5%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.3%53.0%GPT-6 Luna
DTBench90.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMCA44.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured61.1%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured85.6%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
CL-benchNot measured11.9%Only Kimi K2 0711 measured
Furniture assembly44.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text1389Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1408Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1363Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision1216Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: English1393Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: non-English1381Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1427Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: German1376Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1369Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Korean1359Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: French1408Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1391Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Russian1392Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Polish1383Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1392Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1408Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1384Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1364Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: English1204Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1266Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1225Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1205Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Kimi K2 0711
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaKimi K2 0711Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-6 Luna$0.0003Fits in one request
Kimi K2 0711$0.0017Fits in one request

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-6 Luna$0.0065Fits in one request
Kimi K2 0711$0.035Fits in one request

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-6 Luna$0.025Fits in one request
Kimi K2 0711$0.137Exceeds the context window

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-6 Luna and Kimi K2 0711
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-6 LunaMoonshotAI Kimi K2 0711
MakerOpenAIMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2026July 11, 2025
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.57
Output $/Mtok$0.50$2.30
Coding index71.464.7
Independent measurements behind it22
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-6 Luna better than Kimi K2 0711 for coding?

GPT-6 Luna scores 71.4 and Kimi K2 0711 64.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking. Pick GPT-6 Luna when output tokens cost 4.6x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 131K tokens.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or Kimi K2 0711?

GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Kimi K2 0711 costs $0.57 and $2.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6 Luna or Kimi K2 0711?

GPT-6 Luna, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-6 Luna vs Kimi K2 0711 comparison based on?

9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-6 Luna's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Kimi K2 0711's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-6-luna-vs-kimi-k2" title="GPT-6 Luna vs Kimi K2 0711, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-6-luna-vs-kimi-k2">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-6 Luna vs Kimi K2 0711</a></p>